This hopelessly stupid and dishonest game again?
If you weren't just playing dishonest *gotcha* games, you would take it as read that he "don't support violence." Instead, you assume he does and act like you have some kind of right to demand that he say it whenever you demand. I've seen you play that before. Who do you think you are?
Same thing over and over again on this site. Someone wants to score imaginary internets points against their targets, so they make a post or start a thread announcing that they've found something they haven't heard anyone condemn, and that means that everybody who doesn't make a pilgrimage to their holiness's thread to condemn whatever it is must support it. Like this waste of space of a thread:
Zachary Hammond -2015- Unarmed White 19 year old male killed by police
It's as old as the internet. Who do you people think you're fooling anymore? If you want to attack someone for supporting violence, X,
find a post where they supported violence, quote it, and argue your point.
You have no basis to expect that you would have seen Deuce announce that he does not "support violence", nor any basis to expect him to make a point of saying so because the baseline assumption is that a person does not support violence....
....whatever the **** "support violence" is supposed to mean. Like, a chaotic evil barbarian in D&D who just loves hitting things with axes for the sake of hitting things with axes? What?