• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What are women marching about? [W:182]

Re: What are women marching about?

Fair enough.



The OP was literally nothing a black woman's opinion, Thorgasm.

Jesse, read what he said:
Quote Originally Posted by Thorgasm View Post
So we have a thread where a bunch of white men willfully can't understand what issues a group they don't belong to may be marching about. We've seen this movie before.

Again, he's pointing out what's going on in the discussion, not speaking directly towards the OP.
 
Re: What are women marching about?

So why didn't MLK call their protests Black March? Or African Americans United? Or something similar? Blacks were the ones that led the movement after all.

Is that what is confusing you? The name of the march?

IIRC, it was Serenity who explained that for you.

Calling this a "womans march" is imo doing a disservice to all the groups in there that have issues that have nothing to do with women. When a person hears "womens march" they're not going to think about immigration policies or disability rights or anything other than women's issues. Like abortion.

And I understand that in the view of the participants there is no appropriation going on but what about outside of the group? That is who these people are trying to target isn't it? The goal of any protest is to target those not in the group so that you can garner more people to your side so that you can get things changed to your way of thinking. Right? In order to do that you have to give a perception of what it is that you're about. Since this "women's march" isn't strictly about women...in fact most of the issues have nothing to do with women...then the perception that should be sent out is something neutral. Like the Civil Rights movement did 60 years ago. Otherwise people are going to get the wrong perception. BLM had the same problem. The perception of them, including their name, relegated them to being misunderstood and more often than not mocked.

I do not know of any targeting going on here. My understanding is that they are trying to raise awareness by bringing attention to a variety of issues that affect women

And it is working. Even those who are reacting to the march by asking what the march was about are bringing attention to the matter by initiating a discussion about womens rights, which is the first step in raising awareness.

Reasonable people can disagree about their tactics and the effectiveness of those tactics. However, it takes a special kind of cluelessness to believe the only womens issue they were cconcerned with is abortion and everything else had nothing to do with womens rights.
 
Re: What are women marching about?

Yet another case where its clear that you don't know how to read.

Some people don't know how to compose a coherent sentence.
 
Re: What are women marching about?

Some people don't know how to compose a coherent sentence.

Relative to whose reading it apparently. It was coherent to everyone else.
 
Re: What are women marching about?

Moderator's Warning:
Folks, the baiting/trolling needs to stop. Stick to discussing the topic, and doing so in a civil matter. Think someone's post is wrong? Explain why it's wrong. Think someone's point is mistaken? Explain why? But the posts and comments that simply are mocking, belittling, and attacking need to end and the excuse of "oh it's about the argument" isn't going to fly going forward in this thread. If you can't stop baiting you're getting points
 
Re: What are women marching about?

Actually, you are wrong. the reason most women started going to work is the fact that the amount of pay that the business were given in comparison to the cost of living kept on decreasing, and to have any kind of standard of living, you needed two incomes in the house hold.

You’ve skipped ahead too far. After feminists convinced women to go out and get jobs, married couples found themselves with more money. Such people were targeted by salesmen and told to “keep up with the Jones's”.

Suddenly couples who were content with a small two bedroom house and a single car, wanted three or four bedroom houses, two cars, a swimming pool and a boat. They wanted the biggest washing machine, biggest refrigerator, biggest oven and the biggest, best TV. They wanted newspapers delivered, a nice dog, nice hairdos, and nice clothes.

Wives were encouraged to put everything on credit and have shopping sprees, buying shoes, dresses, jewelry, handbags. They had to have the best watches. They had to have “vacations”, and not just to a nearby camping spot, but interstate or overseas, visiting landmarks and tourist attractions. They had to have a good camera and a slide projector, or even a 8 or 16 mm film camera for home movies. They wanted the best vacuum cleaners.

The more advertisers convinced them the more the married couple spent, using up all their combined wages in the process. When you have more money you tend to spend more and women were suckers for good looking con-artist salesmen. It was the first time they had a lot of money after all, and they would go to town on it.

Now your “needed both wages to pay the bills” came along. At this point, when they were thoroughly hocked, they “needed” to have both wages.

The answer today for anyone wishing to return to the much better system of raising kids is to go back to the old ways. Here’s what you do:

1) Buy a cheap, two bedroom house. Fix it up yourselves.

2) Have one car, not two, for the man to go to work in.

3) Don’t invest in anything you don’t need, including pools, big TV’s, fancy clothes, jewelry, etc.

4) “Vacations” should be you in the car, with a tent, going camping.

5) No boats, expensive appliances, no silicon tits, no facelifts, no expensive wigs, etc.

6) The husband works. The wife stays at home and raises kids.

7) Don’t try making your husband into a wife.

8) No braces for kids’ teeth.

9) No expensive phones or iPads for kids.

10) Buy inexpensive appliances.

11) Buy second hand car instead of new one. Try not to borrow. Don’t use credit cards.

12) Do most jobs yourself. Repair roof yourself. Paint house yourself. Lay footpath yourself.

13) Fix car yourself. Grow vegetables and fruit.

14) Fix shirts, buttons, socks etc. with needles and thread instead of throwing away.

15) Don’t buy takeout. Cook your own food.

16) Don’t spend a fortune on presents for others at birthdays or X-mas. Be frugal. Don’t be bullied into conforming. Remember – that’s just advertisers using psychology to blackmail you.

17) Eventually the husband will make more and the house will have equity. Sell house and buy bigger one. Always buy fixer-upper and fix it up yourself to increase equity. Take a boarder (like a female Asian student) to bring in extra cash. If there’s room, take two.

18) Even when you’re wealthier, continue with many of these practices. Don’t start splurging.

19) Use discipline to raise your kids. Don’t spare the rod and spoil the child. They will help you with household chores, and even with your business rather than being fat, drugged, useless parasites. They will eventually help make you wealthy.

20) As a result of the above you will have a marriage that lasts and kids to be proud of. You’ll probably be wealthier and happier than most of your family and friends, who used the current system – i.e. – “Acquire as much as possible, put kids in a kindergarten, spoil them rotten and then get divorced.”

This method was much better, before feminists persuaded women to throw it all away and wreck their families.


.
 
Re: What are women marching about?

You should google that black womans name.

She is an idiot. A YUGE idiot

Oh, I know all about Candace Owens. I wanted to see how far I could run with being the devil's advocate. It wasn't very far, given that multiple people have already mentioned her questionable background by now.

Edit: and there's a warning up too, it seems. Even more reason to drop the jig.
 
Back
Top Bottom