We're in a permanent coup

[SCrider]

Republicans elect a crook and then whine like preteens when he's investigated for all the crooked stuff he does.

Sometimes this board reads like a Russian board.

I really hope some of these posters are Russian trolls. If not this country is headed the wrong way fast.

 

[CaughtInThe]

I really hope some of these posters are Russian trolls. If not this country is headed the wrong way fast.

I don't think they're Russian.

They just sound like Russians.

 

[eohrnberger]

Ken Starr did the investigating before the Clinton impeachment. They do not have a special investigator for this one so they are investigating it now via the depositions. basically apples to Oldsmobiles. were you outraged that Starr investigated behind closed doors as well?

The Clinton impeachment was by bi-partisan agreement, and was with bi-partisan support (see previous post if you doubt me).

What of this impeachment charade, political theater, is bi-partisan in any way?

That which it claims, that the phone call had a quid pro quo is already disproved by release of the transcript - no quid quo pro.

That which it claims, that the Trump administration was looking for a quid pro quo is already disproved by release of the texts messages from the administration's representatives - 'No quid pro quo of any kind'.

That which it claims, that the Trump administration was looking for a quid pro quo is already disproved, in that the Ukrainian's weren't aware that the military aid was being held up. So what was the quid part of the quid pro quo?

That which it claims, that Trump was pressuring Pres. Z. was already disproved - Pres. Z. stated he felt no pressure.

So what's this really all about? This is little more than a slimy, smearing, Democrat orchestrated political hit job, without substance, clearly.

 

[SCrider]

The Clinton impeachment was by bi-partisan agreement, and was with bi-partisan support (see previous post if you doubt me).

What of this impeachment charade, political theater, is bi-partisan in any way?

That which it claims, that the phone call had a quid pro quo is already disproved by release of the transcript - no quid quo pro.

That which it claims, that the Trump administration was looking for a quid pro quo is already disproved by release of the texts messages from the administration's representatives - 'No quid pro quo of any kind'.

That which it claims, that the Trump administration was looking for a quid pro quo is already disproved, in that the Ukrainian's weren't aware that the military aid was being held up. So what was the quid part of the quid pro quo?

That which it claims, that Trump was pressuring Pres. Z. was already disproved - Pres. Z. stated he felt no pressure.

So what's this really all about? This is little more than a slimy, smearing, Democrat orchestrated political hit job, without substance, clearly.

Let's wait until they release the evidence for the vote. Then we can say wether it's bi-partisan or not.

 

[eohrnberger]

Let's wait until they release the evidence for the vote. Then we can say wether it's bi-partisan or not.

The precedent from the Clinton impeachment process was that both parties had subpoena power, question witnesses, and this is clearly not the case now.

This impeachment didn't start in any bi-partisan manner.
This impeachment hasn't proceeded in any bi-partisan manner.
This impeachment won't end in any bi-partisan manner.

This impeachment wasn't done for any bi-partisan reasons.
Democrats have abandoned bipartisan format of Clinton impeachment



Rep. Al Green: "I'm Concerned If We Don't Impeach This President, He Will Get Re-Elected"

This is why Trump is being impeached. No other reasons.

This impeachment is simply just more of what Democrats have done over the last decade, namely, politicization of the federal government by Democrats for use as political weapons.

Two+ years of 'wait and see' with Mueller politically driven investigation to end up with nothing than a hoax. No more of that crap.

 

[SCrider]

The precedent from the Clinton impeachment process was that both parties had subpoena power, question witnesses, and this is clearly not the case now.

This impeachment didn't start in any bi-partisan manner.
This impeachment hasn't proceeded in any bi-partisan manner.
This impeachment won't end in any bi-partisan manner.

This impeachment wasn't done for any bi-partisan reaons.

Rep. Al Green: "I'm Concerned If We Don't Impeach This President, He Will Get Re-Elected"

This is why Trump is being impeached. No other reasons.

This impeachment is simply just more of what Democrats have done over the last decade, namely, politicization of the federal government by Democrats for use as political weapons.

Two+ years of 'wait and see' with Mueller politically driven investigation to end up with nothing than a hoax. No more of that crap.

Once again we are in the investigation phase not the impeachment phase.
Wasn't it the GOP who changed the subpoena power? Can't have it both ways.

 

[eohrnberger]

Once again we are in the investigation phase not the impeachment phase.
Wasn't it the GOP who changed the subpoena power? Can't have it both ways.

Your post doesn't alter any of the observations made in my post.

The precedent that was set in during the Clinton impeachment, being bi-partisan, both parties having subpoena power and the ability to question witnesses, as described in #119, was even during 'Impeachment Inquiry' phase.

I stand by my previous post, #155.

 

[TrumpGurl]

from a prominent Dem supporter Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone

Taibbi is one of the few to break with the MSM and call a coup a coup.



We'''re in a permanent coup

Correct