• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Website Labeled ‘Fake News’ Threatens To Sue WaPo For Defamation

God, look at this crap. Somebody is just running his own pizza shop, some dickheads on a 4chan weave an entire narrative with his restaurant as the center of a pedophilia ring, and now the poor guy has to deal with morons. Where do these wackos come from? One of them came from Philadelphia. Why are crazy people so motivated?

 
According to their own website they speak disapprovingly of such a thing.
I believe you're mistaken.

How so?

we are now in the midst of a large scale, concerted campaign to reduce the bargaining power and pay of ordinary workers relative to investors and elite technocrats. We believe this effort is not only detrimental to most citizens, but is ultimately destructive to the capitalists classes, since highly unequal societies produce worse outcomes on virtually all broad measures, such as crime rates, longevity, and educational attainment. Indeed, inequality exacts a cost in terms of the health of even the top cohort. But this cohort seems to define its self-interest in narrow economic terms.

With the help of a growing group of dedicated and skilled writers, we are chronicling this transition and doing what we can, in our small way, to fight it.

About | naked capitalism
 
I couldn't have formed this opinion on my own? why not? I assure you as a 54 year old man that has seen quite a bit in my life, I can form my own opinions.....

lolz. Are you seriously suggesting that you are the first person to think that
all this "fake news" crap is about MSM losing their hold on readership/viewership and they are scared to death since this last election showed them to be the lying hacks they are.

You didn't form that opinion by reading hyper-partisan blogs or other sources? Really? Everyone forms their opinions on stuff they choose to see!
 
That's what I said.
They chronicle, disapprovingly, of what you quoted from Wiki.

I said they chronicle it and you said I was wrong. I was not wrong about the fact that they chronicled this. No need to add the word disapprovingly there. Their agenda is already in a negative tone.
 
lolz. Are you seriously suggesting that you are the first person to think that

You didn't form that opinion by reading hyper-partisan blogs or other sources? Really? Everyone forms their opinions on stuff they choose to see!

Unlike hive minded liberals, conservatives tend to make up their own minds....
 
Unlike hive minded liberals, conservatives tend to make up their own minds....

Wow another thing that you think is an original thought but isn't. Color me surprised.
 
I think when you name your site Nakedcapitalism, the agenda there is all too clear, don't you? The bias is in the title.
Um...having an "agenda" determines that a news site is "fake"?

I thought the point of determining if a news site is fake.... is that the "news" reported....is fake.

As NC points out, the WP has not cited (nor have you) any reporting that is "fake".
 
Wow another thing that you think is an original thought but isn't. Color me surprised.

I know that you would like to draw me into some sort of back and forth making this about us instead of the thread at hand, so if you have anything else related to the thread feel free to post it, if all you want to do is attack me, then we are done and I will not reply....
 
I know that you would like to draw me into some sort of back and forth making this about us instead of the thread at hand, so if you have anything else related to the thread feel free to post it, if all you want to do is attack me, then we are done and I will not reply....

I basically asked you what sources you use and you refused to answer the question.
 
Bumped...because you are avoiding it..
I think when you name your site Nakedcapitalism, the agenda there is all too clear, don't you? The bias is in the title.
Um...having an "agenda" determines that a news site is "fake"?

I thought the point of determining if a news site is fake.... is that the "news" reported....is fake.

As NC points out, the WP has not cited (nor have you) any reporting that is "fake".
 
Um...having an "agenda" determines that a news site is "fake"?

I thought the point of determining if a news site is fake.... is that the "news" reported....is fake.

As NC points out, the WP has not cited (nor have you) any reporting that is "fake".

No but it helps. I wouldn't consider Rushlimbaugh.com or Algore.com to be a news site. This site is no different from those sites. It's a right wing version of Salon.com at best. Just because there are opinions on a site that you agree with doesn't make it a reputable news site.
 
Ok, well then I guess we are done....You can think what you want, I guess in your mind, I can't.

I'm not saying it's black and white. None of your opinions are your own, but I am saying your opinions have been formed by what you read. Mine have. How can yours not? Then, if you were truly making up your own mind you wouldn't care about the way you think the MSM goes about their business right?
 
So then it would be really stupid to start off a determination on if a site is "fake" on if it has an "agenda"....but you did so....which is no surprise.

I wouldn't consider Rushlimbaugh.com or Algore.com to be a news site.
Who in the hell said they were? Why are you creating straw man arguments AND stupid arguments?

This site is no different from those sites. It's a right wing version of Salon.com at best.
FFS....you think Naked Capitalism...is "right wing"? My gawd, the stupidity goes on!

Just because there are opinions on a site that you agree with doesn't make it a reputable news site.
I never said that having opinions I agree with makes it reputable, frigging another straw man! Yer the one that made the STUPID implication that having an agenda makes a site "fake", not the content....and you had to walk that back.

I'm STILL waiting for ANY example from Naked Capitalism that shows them to be a "fake" news site. Lemme know when you have the goods....and maybe then you can shoot it over to WaPo since at this point....they could use the help.
 
I'm not saying it's black and white. None of your opinions are your own, but I am saying your opinions have been formed by what you read. Mine have. How can yours not? Then, if you were truly making up your own mind you wouldn't care about the way you think the MSM goes about their business right?

I do when they try and shut down free speech because they see it as a threat to their business model....
 
Then, if you were truly making up your own mind you wouldn't care about the way you think the MSM goes about their business right?
Um, you seem to be one of the few who has taken the word of WaPo as "right"....and has not made up his own mind.

I find that IRONIC.
 
And I have to add..
I wouldn't consider Rushlimbaugh.com or Algore.com to be a news site.
They, as far as I know, are not Russian propaganda sites setup to create "fake" new stories either, so again....WTF is yer point?
 
Um, you seem to be one of the few who has taken the word of WaPo as "right"....and has not made up his own mind.

I find that IRONIC.

You think I think Washington Post is right and I haven't made up my mind about this at the same time. :crazy3:
 
So then it would be really stupid to start off a determination on if a site is "fake" on if it has an "agenda"....but you did so....which is no surprise.

Who in the hell said they were? Why are you creating straw man arguments AND stupid arguments?

FFS....you think Naked Capitalism...is "right wing"? My gawd, the stupidity goes on!

I never said that having opinions I agree with makes it reputable, frigging another straw man! Yer the one that made the STUPID implication that having an agenda makes a site "fake", not the content....and you had to walk that back.

I'm STILL waiting for ANY example from Naked Capitalism that shows them to be a "fake" news site. Lemme know when you have the goods....and maybe then you can shoot it over to WaPo since at this point....they could use the help.

My point being was that algore.com and rushlimbaugh.com should be added to the list! Naked capitalism is often listed as an alternative financial blog, not a news source and with her railing against the Washington Post like she is doing along with Donald Trump's rhetoric about the working man, the blog sounds more right wing today than ever before!
 
You think I think Washington Post is right and I haven't made up my mind about this at the same time. :crazy3:

That's right, you have allowed the WaPo to make the determination and you have not figured it out for yourself. I know the WaPo is completely wrong about Naked Capitalism being a "fake" news site. Susan Webber, aka Yves Smith, has been one of the go-to sources for info on MERS problems associated with home ownership before during and after the housing crisis. You know nothing.
 
Last edited:
My point being was that algore.com and rushlimbaugh.com should be added to the list!
You have no criteria for basing such a stupid comment......since the only criteria you used before was whether they had an "agenda", and then you negated the use of that as a criteria. You just keep making stupid commentary.
Naked capitalism is often listed as an alternative financial blog, not a news source
It is an economics news aggregator and an economic opinion site, they pull in all sorts of professors and specialists from the macro world....and do a damn fine job. They present all sorts of "news" on the economic front, you have no idea what they do.
and with her railing against the Washington Post like she is doing along with Donald Trump's rhetoric about the working man, the blog sounds more right wing today than ever before!
Yer frigging stupid commentary is beyond redemption, they are not aligned with Dump in any way shape or form, neither are the contributors. They are not voicing populist ideology designed to fool idiotic rw white males, at all. You know nothing about the site or what they produce, yer just barfing up crap, flinging against yer cage and seeing what sticks. None of it does because it is a watery mess.
 
Back
Top Bottom