Was Flight 93 Shot Down?

[mike2810]

Though uncomfortable for some, it is useful to compare the pictures of the crash scenes of the Ethiopian flight in the 737 Max with the scenes of Shanksville where a 767 supposedly crashed.

In the first and current case, aircraft debris and bodies and luggage were easily seen. They were scattered all about, as such accidents do.

Compare with Shanksville where the cameras recorded nothing in the way of such debris, and the county coroner Miller said exactly that in front of the TV cameras. He noted that they found nothing that suggested an airliner had crashed there.

Hmmm, once again the official story fails for lack of evidence.

Interesting spin from you. Especially since you provided no links to photos or supporting documentation.

Seems these photos and vids show a stark comparison of the two incidents are very similar. Was the 767 Max shot down, hit with a missile, or really didn't crash?
"With the tragedy of Flight 302, with its similar crater and lack of visible debris, the truthers are again forced to decide if they are going give up a precious piece of evidence, or if they are now going to become Ethiopian 302 Truthers."

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 and 9/11's United Flight 93 | Metabunk

 

[gamolon]

Interesting spin from you. Especially since you provided no links to photos or supporting documentation.

Seems these photos and vids show a stark comparison of the two incidents are very similar. Was the 767 Max shot down, hit with a missile, or really didn't crash?
"With the tragedy of Flight 302, with its similar crater and lack of visible debris, the truthers are again forced to decide if they are going give up a precious piece of evidence, or if they are now going to become Ethiopian 302 Truthers."

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 and 9/11's United Flight 93 | Metabunk

Similar to the Plasco building. The truthers had to claim Plasco was an inside job.

 

[mike2810]

Similar to the Plasco building. The truthers had to claim Plasco was an inside job.

Of course it was. That is where the fire was, (inside).:lamo


It will be interesting to see if T72 will post links to the sources he used to come to his conclusions.

 

[Quag]

Though uncomfortable for some, it is useful to compare the pictures of the crash scenes of the Ethiopian flight in the 737 Max with the scenes of Shanksville where a 767 supposedly crashed.

In the first and current case, aircraft debris and bodies and luggage were easily seen. They were scattered all about, as such accidents do.

Compare with Shanksville where the cameras recorded nothing in the way of such debris, and the county coroner Miller said exactly that in front of the TV cameras. He noted that they found nothing that suggested an airliner had crashed there.

Hmmm, once again the official story fails for lack of evidence.

Compeltely debunked with Payne Stewart crash.

 

[Thoreau72]

Interesting spin from you. Especially since you provided no links to photos or supporting documentation.

Seems these photos and vids show a stark comparison of the two incidents are very similar. Was the 767 Max shot down, hit with a missile, or really didn't crash?
"With the tragedy of Flight 302, with its similar crater and lack of visible debris, the truthers are again forced to decide if they are going give up a precious piece of evidence, or if they are now going to become Ethiopian 302 Truthers."

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 and 9/11's United Flight 93 | Metabunk

Yes, I'm sorry Mike. My post was intended for honest and informed posters. Mea Culpa.

 

[mike2810]

Yes, I'm sorry Mike. My post was intended for honest and informed posters. Mea Culpa.

apology accepted.

Noted: You did nothing to refute what was posted in the link I provided.

Nor did you provide any links to back up your statement. Typical.

 

[Bodi]

does what this eyewitness is saying about "zapping the radar system" make any sense?

Well, that sold me. I am a believer now...

 

[ralphcdp]

There is a great deal of evidence surrounding UA93 that illustrates the US governments' story has no validity whatsoever. Whether it was shot down or whatever doesn't much matter in the grand scheme of things. The salient point is that it is part of a much wider US governments' conspiracy that falsely accused 19 Muslims of something they never did.

There is no evidence for the men ever existing. There are so many impossibilities in the US governments' story that illustrates they never had anything to do with what was described.

 

[mike2810]

There is a great deal of evidence surrounding UA93 that illustrates the US governments' story has no validity whatsoever. Whether it was shot down or whatever doesn't much matter in the grand scheme of things. The salient point is that it is part of a much wider US governments' conspiracy that falsely accused 19 Muslims of something they never did.

There is no evidence for the men ever existing. There are so many impossibilities in the US governments' story that illustrates they never had anything to do with what was described.

So which explanation regarding Flight 93 do you believe is correct?

 

[ralphcdp]

So which explanation regarding Flight 93 do you believe is correct?

That is just useless airy fairy distractions. The criminal trials will sort it all out. But again here, the evidence is overwhelming. The lame story of the "let's roll" passengers never happened.

 

[mike2810]

That is just useless airy fairy distractions. The criminal trials will sort it all out. But again here, the evidence is overwhelming. The lame story of the "let's roll" passengers never happened.

So you don't have an explanation you believe. Thanks for not sharing.
What evidence is "overwhelming"?, If you are so sure it would be simple for you to post it.

 

[ralphcdp]

So you don't have an explanation you believe. Thanks for not sharing.
What evidence is "overwhelming"?, If you are so sure it would be simple for you to post it.

But the official US government story is the strong one, isn't it? Why is no one able to give any evidence for it? The court case will be the coup de grace. It's all over but for the weeping and wailing.

 

[Quag]

But the official US government story is the strong one, isn't it? Why is no one able to give any evidence for it? The court case will be the coup de grace. It's all over but for the weeping and wailing.

Typical truther evasion.

 

[zyzygy]

Typical truther evasion.

That's all they have. The truther movement has been dead for a long time.

 

[Thoreau72]

apology accepted.

Noted: You did nothing to refute what was posted in the link I provided.

Nor did you provide any links to back up your statement. Typical.

I simply asked anybody to compare and analyze the 2 crash scenes, and offer their own thoughts on the two. One scene shows pieces of wrecked airplane, including bodies and luggage, the other scene shows nothing at all like that.

Some folks are able to analyze and form conclusions on their own, others need somebody to show them what to think.

 

[Quag]

I simply asked anybody to compare and analyze the 2 crash scenes, and offer their own thoughts on the two. One scene shows pieces of wrecked airplane, including bodies and luggage, the other scene shows nothing at all like that.

Some folks are able to analyze and form conclusions on their own, others need somebody to show them what to think.

Some people know that different crashes will look different, Ie they actually think
Why dont you compare it to the Payne Stewart crash site?

 

[ralphcdp]

The US Federal grand jury will sort it all out given the irrefutable scientific evidence they have been given.

 

[Thoreau72]

The US Federal grand jury will sort it all out given the irrefutable scientific evidence they have been given.

The American jury is not what it used to be.....

 

[ralphcdp]

The American jury is not what it used to be.....

When they see the evidence, they can't help but do their duties as citizens.

 

[mike2810]

But the official US government story is the strong one, isn't it? Why is no one able to give any evidence for it? The court case will be the coup de grace. It's all over but for the weeping and wailing.

Still no answer from you to questions asked. There is no need to continue with you unless you want to start answering the questions.

 

[mike2810]

I simply asked anybody to compare and analyze the 2 crash scenes, and offer their own thoughts on the two. One scene shows pieces of wrecked airplane, including bodies and luggage, the other scene shows nothing at all like that.

Some folks are able to analyze and form conclusions on their own, others need somebody to show them what to think.

I did. I also provided a link to a site with photos doing a comparison. What I provided does not match your view. The sites are very similar. Clear enough for you?

 

[ralphcdp]

Still no answer from you to questions asked. There is no need to continue with you unless you want to start answering the questions.

There is no need to answer silly questions from folks who can provide no evidence whatsoever for their fantasies. The grand jury will sort things out in due time.

 

[mike2810]

There is no need to answer silly questions from folks who can provide no evidence whatsoever for their fantasies. The grand jury will sort things out in due time.

We are done.
Ask T72 why the paper submitted to the Grand Jury makes no mention of mini neutron bombs. It is what he believes was used.

 

[ralphcdp]

We are done.

Of course you, the supporters of the US governments' story are done. You have always been done, clinging to fantasies for which not any evidence has ever been provided. A bunch of anonymous know nothings.

The grand jury has all the information they need to recommend indictments. Then the world can return to sanity, free from US lies and war crimes.

 

[Quag]

There is no need to answer silly questions from folks who can provide no evidence whatsoever for their fantasies. The grand jury will sort things out in due time.

As you have so eloquently pointed no one need ever answer your questions