[W:161]Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

[jnug]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Public Servants are not above criticisms.

she dealt with corrupt leaders in Ukraine....what are the chances she knows more than she's willing to be honest about prior Ukraine leadership?

You must have checked in with Solomon for another CT to spin.

 

[Trump]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

You must have checked in with Solomon for another CT to spin.

focus on topic...straw man

 

[jnug]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

focus on topic...straw man

Your post was a "what are the chances post". Is the topic of the thread betting odds?

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Public Servants are not above criticisms.

she dealt with corrupt leaders in Ukraine....what are the chances she knows more than she's willing to be honest about prior Ukraine leadership?

But they are above not being intimidated and smeared.
If you don't understand the difference, go back and audit a kindergarten class.

 

[element94]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Public Servants are not above criticisms.

she dealt with corrupt leaders in Ukraine....what are the chances she knows more than she's willing to be honest about prior Ukraine leadership?

You should be telegraphing this to the Fox News rubes, because it's wasted here.

 

[Trump]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

You should be telegraphing this to the Fox News rubes, because it's wasted here.

focus...not about me or Fox...straw man

 

[Mach]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

intimidation.....hahahahahah.....think Pelosi and Schiff are trying to intimidate Trump when they hold pressers and tell Trump to come forward with evidence....hahahahahahaha

Asking the subject of an investigation to exonerate themselves by coming forward with information to exonerate themselves is intimidation?
Lawfully requesting a subject of an investigation to participate in that investigating by testifying under oath, is somehow unlawful intimidattion? It's the very definition of lawful.

Why do you post such stupid stuff?

 

[Mach]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

focus...not about me or Fox...straw man

That's not a strawman, he's just calling out your absurd, right wing propaganda posts for what they are. He's mocking Fox news viewers, rightfully so.

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Nunes is a whiny little bitch.

 

[lemmiwinx]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

The ambassador looks like whiny little b*tch who's mad cause she got fired. Obama legacy appointee.

 

[Obscurity]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

The ambassador looks like whiny little b*tch who's mad cause she got fired. Obama legacy appointee.

Total nonsense.

The reason the republicants are saying this is "boring" simply do not want the public to see:

Ranting and insane lunatic conspiratorial right wingers, against reasonable, well spoken, legitimate witnesses.

What a ****ing joke Nunes is.

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Nice show there by the Republican's they knew full well that the first 45mins is for Nunes and counsel. That is how it went the last time.
The Rep from NY will get her 5mins later.

 

[lemmiwinx]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Total nonsense.

The reason the republicants are saying this is "boring" simply do not want the public to see:

Ranting and insane lunatic conspiratorial right wingers, against reasonable, well spoken, legitimate witnesses.

What a ****ing joke Nunes is.

The public are seeing and are asking themselves what is Trump being impeached for firing an ambassador? You gotta come up with a crime eventually.

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

The public are seeing and are asking themselves what is Trump being impeached for firing an ambassador? You gotta come up with a crime eventually.

The public that have two brain cells to rub together know that he is not being impeached for firing an ambassador, the Dems are laying a foundation of the breadth of the corruption in the Trump Admin.

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

I can't believe that counsel is bringing up Lev and Igor....

 

[Obscurity]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

The public are seeing and are asking themselves what is Trump being impeached for firing an ambassador? You gotta come up with a crime eventually.

He's being impeached for using his office for political gain - already realized by the ads his campaign is running.

Moreover, anyone who DOESN'T listen to fox, who ISN'T brainwashed by the republican idiocy, is interested in this historic incident and the MAJORITY see what he did as wrong.

 

[Obscurity]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

I can't believe that counsel is bringing up Lev and Igor....

Their line of defense is garbage.

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Their line of defense is garbage.

Yes, but I didn't think they would then set their own garbage on fire.
(I was wrong).

 

[Integrityrespec]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

So a fair process, is one in which Adam Schiff refuses to recognize an elected congresswoman and member of the committee to ask questions? We know all we need to know about the fair, thoughtful process being played out by the democrats.

 

[Obscurity]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

Yes, but I didn't think they would then set their own garbage on fire.
(I was wrong).

They're completely incompetent. Nunes is a total joke, the republicans are a total joke, the ranting, raving, constant whining about process.

Listening to this is obnoxious. The republicans are trying to make this line of inquiry uninteresting so they can say meh, she didn't see it, let's move along.

What a joke.

 

[Obscurity]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

So a fair process, is one in which Adam Schiff refuses to recognize an elected congresswoman and member of the committee to ask questions? We know all we need to know about the fair, thoughtful process being played out by the democrats.

The first 45 minutes is reserved for speaker/leader and counsel. She will get her time, entitled, whiney little **** that she and nunes are.

I can't wait to see the rabid, soulless Gymnasium Jordan.

 

[TomFitz]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

she has no knowledge. she was fired. she has literally has nothing to add or nothing to give as testimony.

You just go right on pretending that you actually believe that.

Your fool’s gold fuhrer obviously does not. As his behavior this morning makes dramatically clear.

The one thing that Trump is deathly intimidated by is a professional with integrity.

He acts like a schoolboy caught out for acting out.

 

[TomFitz]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

They're completely incompetent. Nunes is a total joke, the republicans are a total joke, the ranting, raving, constant whining about process.

Listening to this is obnoxious. The republicans are trying to make this line of inquiry uninteresting so they can say meh, she didn't see it, let's move along.

What a joke.

Nunes was in form. Whining, lying, whatabout-ing.

 

[SkyFox76]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

The public are seeing and are asking themselves what is Trump being impeached for firing an ambassador? You gotta come up with a crime eventually.

No, the public is being shown 2+2=4, while you are apparently stuck back on trying to figure out the fancy item between the numbers.

 

[Pound4abrown]

Re: Marie Yovanovitch testimony -- comments

So a fair process, is one in which Adam Schiff refuses to recognize an elected congresswoman and member of the committee to ask questions? We know all we need to know about the fair, thoughtful process being played out by the democrats.

And that is what they expect you to fall for. Because you obviously haven't been paying attention. This is the set of rules for all Impeachment hearings.
Just like it was on day one with Kent and Taylor.
So what you should be exasperated by is the Republicans not following the rules, again.