• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

[W:112, 773]The Gun Show "Loophole"

TypicalRussian said:
Absolutely not, no women or man can do as good as a job as they did 40 years earlier, impossible
Click to expand...


Are you saying that women are affected by old age more and their ability to work diminishes faster ?

Where's your evidence for that?

I think if I were to hire a lawyer to represent me, I'd rather a 70 experienced guy than a 30 year old with just a few years experience ?
 
Rich2018 said:
Are you saying that women are affected by old age more and their ability to work diminishes faster ?

Where's your evidence for that?

I think if I were to hire a lawyer to represent me, I'd rather a 70 experienced guy than a 30 year old with just a few years experience ?
Click to expand...

Yeah I am saying that, but women love longer, its biology, women go through puberty before and mature faster than boys so they age faster.

A 70 year old lawyer isnt has lost some of his skills
 
TypicalRussian said:
I am ignoring your ad hominem
Click to expand...

You can ignore it all you want, your posts paint you as the sexist bigot you are


All of what I am saying is common knowledge
Click to expand...

Prove it
Your sexist, bigotry is not "common knowledge"


Says I
Click to expand...


Your opinion is worthless - other than to demonstrate your sexist bigotry (are you a doctor?)

A moment ago it was "common knowledge" now the truth is out - it's just your personal (and bigoted) opinion.


Strange how evidence for "common knowledge" is so hard to find

Evidence of sexist bigots, less so.
 
Rich2018 said:
You can ignore it all you want, your posts paint you as the sexist bigot you are




Prove it
Your sexist, bigotry is not "common knowledge"





Your opinion is worthless - other than to demonstrate your sexist bigotry (are you a doctor?)

A moment ago it was "common knowledge" now the truth is out - it's just your personal (and bigoted) opinion.


Strange how evidence for "common knowledge" is so hard to find

Evidence of sexist bigots, less so.
Click to expand...

the ad hominedm is too much for me to continue
 
Rich2018 said:
It's called an "analogy"

If a gun owner's opinion on gun control is more important than a "gun banner" regarding gun control , why would a slave owner's opinion count for more than an abolitionist regarding slavery ?
Click to expand...

An analogy has a logical connection. There is no logical connection between slavery and gun ownership.
 
Rich2018 said:
I agree.

Well we need some basic qualifications, age, not being incarcerated etc
I think legal residents who live in the USA and pay taxes should be allowed to vote
I also think all eligible voters must be registered and every state must be obliged to register them
Furthermore I think attendance at a voting station should be mandatory on election day (you don't have to vote but you should have to show up)


I think every voter (whether or not they have even touched a gun) should vote on gun control.
Click to expand...

Let’s use your slavery analogy but in a different way.

You say slavery was settled wit the the 13th. The 2nd was settled with the 2A.

Slavery was democratic. Do you believe anything the majority agrees to should be law? Like slavery?
 
Aberration said:
An analogy has a logical connection. There is no logical connection between slavery and gun ownership.
Click to expand...

There is a logical connection. Those who support banning privately owned firearms also support slavery. After all, you can't own slaves if they are armed. The anti-American gun control nuts want to make slaves of us all.
 
Glitch said:
There is a logical connection. Those who support banning privately owned firearms also support slavery. After all, you can't own slaves if they are armed. The anti-American gun control nuts want to make slaves of us all.
Click to expand...

Says who ?

Slaves can't be armed ? Tell the Mamluks that - they were warrior slaves:


Mamluk - Wikipedia



Or the Janissaries, who began as an elite corps of slaves:

Janissaries - Wikipedia



Slave owners in the US South weren't short of guns either.


Seems to me that those who support gun control would be the kind of person who supported abolition.
 
Aberration said:
Let’s use your slavery analogy but in a different way.

You say slavery was settled wit the the 13th. The 2nd was settled with the 2A.

Slavery was democratic. Do you believe anything the majority agrees to should be law? Like slavery?
Click to expand...


The "second was settled by the 2A" ???


Do you mean slavery was settled by the 2nd amendment? If so, how do you account for slaves as late as 1865 ?
 
TypicalRussian said:
I never claimed women were not as worthy

:roll:
Click to expand...

Post #989:


...men work longer and retire after, women usually take a break in their thirties to stay home and then return after, there is no problem with that, this is why the Wage Gap is false
Click to expand...

So you justify the wage gap (falsely)


You say men are worth more - ie they're more WORTHY


Liars have to have good memories.
 
Rich2018 said:
Post #989:




So you justify the wage gap (falsely)


You say men are worth more - ie they're more WORTHY


Liars have to have good memories.
Click to expand...

The wage gap is false because women typically work less hours and take more vacation days.

That is not sexist

Anyone who doesnt subscribe to feminism isnt a sexist bigot
 
TypicalRussian said:
The wage gap is false because women typically work less hours and take more vacation days.
Click to expand...

What evidence do you have of this, of men and women who're doing the same job.

That's what the wage gap is, women getting paid less for doing the same job





That is not sexist

Anyone who doesnt subscribe to feminism isnt a sexist bigot
Click to expand...


That is sexist bigotry and you're full of it.
 
Rich2018 said:
What evidence do you have of this, of men and women who're doing the same job.

That's what the wage gap is, women getting paid less for doing the same job








That is sexist bigotry and you're full of it.
Click to expand...

The wage gap is false and you know it.

Sorry ladies, I'm not worried about wage gaps - Telegraph

the Wage gap is false, it is a fact that women work less hours, do not go into higher education as often, take more days off, and so much more

Once again, ignoring the ad hominem.
 
TypicalRussian said:
The wage gap is false and you know it.
Click to expand...

Then why is post #989 did you seek to justify it?

...Men work longer and retire after, women usually take a break in their thirties to stay home and then return after, there is no problem with that, this is why the Wage Gap is false
Click to expand...


the wage gap is false, it is a fact that women work less hours, do not go into higher education as often, take more days off, and so much more...
Click to expand...


We talking of women being paid less with the SAME qualifications


"A 2010 research review by the majority staff of the United States Congress Joint Economic Committee reported that studies have consistently found unexplained pay differences even after controlling for measurable factors that are assumed to influence earnings – suggestive of unknown/unmeasurable contributing factors of which gender discrimination may be one. Other studies have found direct evidence of discrimination – for example, more jobs went to women when the applicant's sex was unknown during the hiring process."


Gender pay gap in the United States - Wikipedia
 
Rich2018 said:
Then why is post #989 did you seek to justify it?







We talking of women being paid less with the SAME qualifications


"A 2010 research review by the majority staff of the United States Congress Joint Economic Committee reported that studies have consistently found unexplained pay differences even after controlling for measurable factors that are assumed to influence earnings – suggestive of unknown/unmeasurable contributing factors of which gender discrimination may be one. Other studies have found direct evidence of discrimination – for example, more jobs went to women when the applicant's sex was unknown during the hiring process."


Gender pay gap in the United States - Wikipedia
Click to expand...

Its not justyifiny it, its debunking it, the wage gap is really people getting more work done and taking less days off than other people and going into higher education. That is a fact

the same qualification is complete BS, there is no evidence for the wage gap.

87860DB8-EF15-4671-910D-19693CFCBBEE.webp

Men make more risks than women. THAT IS A BIOLOGICAL FACT and it stems from the hunter-gatherer age
 
TypicalRussian said:
Its not justyifiny it, its debunking it, the wage gap is really people getting more work done and taking less days off than other people and going into higher education. That is a fact

the same qualification is complete BS, there is no evidence for the wage gap.
Click to expand...

I just posted EVIDENCE - are you blind ?



Men make more risks than women. THAT IS A BIOLOGICAL FACT and it stems from the hunter-gatherer age
Click to expand...


Well we left the hunter/gatherer age some time ago

What is your evidence that "men make more risks than women" ?


Another example of your sexist bigotry.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom