• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Victoria Toensing - Fox News legal expert

Mycroft said:
Why does everyone act like trying to root out corruption is a bad thing?
Click to expand...

Yes and doing it secretly makes it so much better. Everyone knows that rooting out corruption needs to be done in back alleys and without law enforcement's knowledge.
 
Mycroft said:
The only scheme Trump has had involving corruption is in getting rid of it...and yes, she got in the way of that and was removed.
Click to expand...

This is just plain ludicrous.

Nothing in Donald Trump’s life or career suggests that Trump gives a good damn about fighting corruption. He sees it as a business opportunity.

And he certainly isn’t fighting corruption by sending a shady tv lawyer and a couple of Russian bag men to do the job.

You seem to be one of the dwindling number of people who still believe it just because Trump bellows it.
 
Mycroft said:
The transcript was the content of the phone call. Multiple people testified to the House about that.
Click to expand...

You just make it up, don’t you?
 
Mycroft said:
The transcript was the content of the phone call. Multiple people testified to the House about that.
Click to expand...

No, it was not the "content". The 'transcript' was carefully edited for public consumption. I believe we haven't seen the entire, unredacted, text. Have you?
 
snakestretcher said:
No, it was not the "content". The 'transcript' was carefully edited for public consumption. I believe we haven't seen the entire, unredacted, text. Have you?
Click to expand...

Why are you lying?

That transcript was created by a "group" of people. It was not "carefully edited for public consumption". Witnesses have testified to the House that it is accurate and complete...including by Vindman, himself. (He may have his own opinions...his own agenda...but he was careful to tell the truth.)

So yes, the transcript is the content of the phone call.
 
Mycroft said:
Why are you lying?

That transcript was created by a "group" of people. It was not "carefully edited for public consumption". Witnesses have testified to the House that it is accurate and complete...including by Vindman, himself. (He may have his own opinions...his own agenda...but he was careful to tell the truth.)

So yes, the transcript is the content of the phone call.
Click to expand...

I'm lying? The ENTIRE UNREDACTED transcript has not been made available, and you're telling us what was made public was "created"! Thanks for making my point for me. If you believe the ENTIRE transcript, unedited, is available then post it. What was revealed to the public is simply what Trump wanted the public to see; the remainder remains hidden. I wonder why.
 
Last edited:
snakestretcher said:
I'm lying? The ENTIRE UNREDACTED transcript has not been made available, and you're telling us what was made public was "created"! Thanks for making my point for me. If you believe the ENTIRE transcript, unedited, is available then post it. What was revealed to the public is simply what Trump wanted the public to see; the remainder remains hidden. I wonder why.
Click to expand...

There were no redactions in the transcript.

Of course, the transcript was created. It didn't just appear out of thin air.

Trump already provided the transcript.

If you really think there is something that is unrevealed, I'm thinking you should move to the CT forum. That's where you'll find it.
 
Mycroft said:
There were no redactions in the transcript.
Click to expand...

Proof? Would this "transcript" be accepted in ANY court as an exact representation of the conversation?
 
BlueTex said:
Proof? Would this "transcript" be accepted in ANY court as an exact representation of the conversation?
Click to expand...

It's already been accepted in the House.
 
Mycroft said:
It's already been accepted in the House.
Click to expand...

LMAO... Of the people on the call, who has testified, under oath, as to the accuracy of the "transcript"?
 
BlueTex said:
LMAO... Of the people on the call, who has testified, under oath, as to the accuracy of the "transcript"?
Click to expand...

Vindman, for one.
 
Victoria Toensing and her husband Joseph DiGenova have worked for Giuliani regarding Ukraine/Bidens.
 
snakestretcher said:
Yes, deflect. It's what we have come to expect. Why not bring up Obama also-and while you're at it Andrew Jackson. Y'know all the things relevant to 2020.
Click to expand...

When Trump promised to drain the swamp, we believed him. Biden is one of those swamp creatures.
 
Excast said:
Everyone is lying to you other than the man who has provably lied thousands of times since taking office.

The Republican Party really has turned into a mindless cult.
Click to expand...

I agree with the lying from the cover-up gang that has their necks so deep in Trump's B.S. for political favors, but for OPs like the one you responded to say Trump is a crusador that wants to root out corruption is obsurd.

Talking about corruption in politics, well that's OK. Although, Trump's corruption is downright over-the-top and dangerous, whereas Biden may have helped his son get a job. I mean really do you think any of the dimwit Trump family would have jobs without nepotism inclucding Donald.
 
Paradoxical said:
When Trump promised to drain the swamp, we believed him. Biden is one of those swamp creatures.
Click to expand...

How many of Trump's associates are either in jail or facing jail time? How many decent people has he replaced with fawning arse-kissers? The swamp is seething with low life scum he appointed.
 
HumblePi said:
A lot of attention is being focused on the interview of Lev Parnas and his contention that everyone was 'in the loop' including Pence and Barr. There's many others who knew what was going on including Fox's Victoria Toensing.

Victoria Toensing, wife to Fox legal opinion commentator Joe diGenova, is another person neck deep who's involved and knows a whole lot. I would be interested to see her called as a witness.

Rudy Giuliani sent a letter to Zelensky in which he request a meeting and specifically mentions that VictoriToensing will be accompanying him.

Excerpt:

Screenshot-2020-01-16-Giuliani-letter-among-new-documents-disclo.png

In response, Victoria Toensing's law firm has put out a statement;

Victoria Toensing Law Firm Says They Had No Knowledge of Rudy Letter to Zelensky
Mark Corallo, a spokesperson for the law firm that Toensing helms with her husband, told The Daily Beast that no one at the firm had any knowledge of the letter. Corallo said the firm also had no knowledge of Giuliani’s outreach to Zelensky’s administration. Giuliani, meanwhile, has said last May that Toensing would be in Ukraine with him, as The New York Times reported. And Toensing has been open about efforts to find information in Ukraine related to a Biden-linked energy company
Click to expand...

:lamo One of these days you are going to figure out that the impeachment investigation takes place in the House. Dems had their chance to call any witness they wanted but were in too big of a hurry. Now its too late. Pelosi, that political mastermind, blew it.

Nah, youll never figure that out
 
snakestretcher said:
Ah hahaha! You elected the king of corruption, theft and fraud and you're accusing democrats? Unbelievable.
Click to expand...

How did Hunter get that job at Burisma? And what sort of work did he do to earn $1,000,000 annual salary? Answer: you dont know and you dont care because you have zero intellectual curiosity when it comes to corruption on the left. But go ahead, prove me wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom