You see, this is EXACTLY why your folks use of your
go to sources ARE NOT, CANNOT, be trusted.
1. Is Uranium a national security asset? Yes.
2. As such, does our control of this necessary national security aset need to remain under US control? Or, as your side constantly, is unfettered to unhinged in its clamorous manner always asserting to the point of drving us into a war, or should it have been handed over to our ostensible arch- ENEMIES...the ( shudder) Russians and the evil of evil, Putin?
3. The huge amount of money happening to fall into Clinton Foundation coffers, timing of BJs trips to Russia, who he met with and his receiving double his already high speaking fees by those connected to the deal...is certainly, at best, highly questionable
4. That we have an American patriot ex-lobbyist who witnessed all this who has come forward with douments, tapes etc... even under an unprescedented gag order placed on him by the Justice Dept so he could not speak out.
5. The FBI (under guess who? coinky-dink of co-inky-dinks, now Special Counsel, the Muel) never informed CFIUS that all this was under investigation...add that we would never have known about ANY of this had the fat lady been elected.
6. It matters not at all if ANY uranium ever went to RUSSIA, that is a red herring, NONE of it was ever supposed to be exported ANYWHERE at all. And it was. I dont think, as we lost control of it, we know where all of it went...cannot be ruled out yet that it did not go to OTHER US ENEMIES.
7. The actual amount is ALSO inconsequential. It like going in to rob a bank and only running out with a dollar fifty...amount doesnt matter, its the bank robbery that is the problem.
7. As the US has little of the world market in this precious listed NATIONAL SECURITY ASSET...is it smart, or beyond traitorous, to give control of that to our nations enemies?
8. This from Snopes (so you just might believe it)
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/
Updated [17 October 2017]: Added synopsis of new reportage by The Hill.
Updated [1 November 2017]:
Added clarifications, more sources, and the announcement of a congressional investigation.
Correction [16 November 2017]:
Previous versions of this article incorrectly stated that no Uranium One-produced uranium had been exported to foreign countries.
I rest my, at this point, still unresolved, but ONGOING, case.
VERDICT :
NOT DEBUNKED