• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tucker Carlson

Tucker Carlson is a scumbag and so is anybody who defends him. Period, end of conversation.

Like I said, you're free not to watch him. BTW is Biden a scumbag for calling Obama the "first AA candidate who is articulate, bright and clean.?" Was his career ruined?
 
No wonder he gets along with Trump so well.

Donald Trump boasted about meeting semi-naked teenagers in beauty pageants
She added that people who worked for Mr Trump “pressured” the women to “fawn over him, go walk up to him, talk to him, get his attention” while still not fully dressed....
...Four women who competed in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant also said the Republican used to walk in. Some of the girls were as young as 15.

Crazy times when someone who apparently gets their sexual gratification by peeping on naked children is supported by a huge percentage of Fundamental Christians, and is made leader of the United States. SMH.

I saw a comment on Pence being an enabler of the "porn President"
 
So easily played and manipulated by MediaMatters?

The term 'Useful idiots' comes to mind.

Carlson has been on on their 'hit list' for years now, and this is just their latest hit.
 
Approve of what? Name something that Sharpton has said on record that even comes close to the **** Carlson said and we can begin the discussion from there.

Otherwise, you got nothing.

“White folks was in the caves while we (blacks) was building empires. ... We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was. ... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”

“So (if) some cracker come and tell you ‘Well, my mother and father blood go back to the Mayflower,’ you better hold your pocket. That ain’t nothing to be proud of. That means their forefathers was crooks.” Sharpton also offered, “If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.”

Is that close enough?
 
“White folks was in the caves while we (blacks) was building empires. ... We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was. ... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”

“So (if) some cracker come and tell you ‘Well, my mother and father blood go back to the Mayflower,’ you better hold your pocket. That ain’t nothing to be proud of. That means their forefathers was crooks.” Sharpton also offered, “If the Jews want to get it on, tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house.”

Is that close enough?

"Ah...I know. Let's bring up that thar black fella as as a defense for Tucky Carlson."
 
No, he being black is unimportant....except to you.

Ah....you just picked a random name out of a hat, and he happened to be Black. :lol:
 
Ah....you just picked a random name out of a hat, and he happened to be Black. :lol:

No, I picked another media figure who should have garnered much more outrage than Tucker Carlson. You have a double standard and so must resort to playing the race card. It's weak and stupid. You probably think the criticism of Omar is race based, too. In your world, black people are immune from criticism. Oh, unless they're conservative, of course.
 
Who made you the arbiter of when his career ends? I also wasn't changing the topic to Sharpton. I was pointing out the hypocrisy. There is a great deal of hypocrisy on the left concerning how they react depending on who the target is. Fairfax is still in office even after being accused of two sexual assaults. But hey, Carlson made a "naughty" comment unapproved by the left so he has to go.

Do we kick out politicians based on accusations of sexual assault now? Just want to be clear on the rules. Because Trump was also accused of sexual assault, and more than two times. Yet he is still in office.
 
Who made you the arbiter of when his career ends? I also wasn't changing the topic to Sharpton. I was pointing out the hypocrisy. There is a great deal of hypocrisy on the left concerning how they react depending on who the target is. Fairfax is still in office even after being accused of two sexual assaults. But hey, Carlson made a "naughty" comment unapproved by the left so he has to go.

It isn't gonna be "the left" who sees to it Carlson goes. Its gonna end up being Fox due to the fact that nobody wants to buy advertising time on that piece of ****s show anymore.

It doesn't get much more free market than that, now does it?
 
It isn't gonna be "the left" who sees to it Carlson goes. Its gonna end up being Fox due to the fact that nobody wants to buy advertising time on that piece of ****s show anymore.
It doesn't get much more free market than that, now does it?


After watching the first 10 minutes of Tucker Carlson tonight, you will be pleasantly surprised to hear that Fox News stands behind Tucker, which means advertisers should now boycott the Fox News channel all together. Right?!?

We'll see how many advertisers will stop buying commercial time on Fox News. (grin)
 
After watching the first 10 minutes of Tucker Carlson tonight, you will be pleasantly surprised to hear that Fox News stands behind Tucker, which means advertisers should now boycott the Fox News channel all together. Right?!?

We'll see how many advertisers will stop buying commercial time on Fox News. (grin)

Its gonna depend.....

I could choose to still advertise on Fox and demand that my ads not be run during his show. Enough of that happens, and its gonna put Fox in an untenable situation.
 
After watching the first 10 minutes of Tucker Carlson tonight, you will be pleasantly surprised to hear that Fox News stands behind Tucker, which means advertisers should now boycott the Fox News channel all together. Right?!?

We'll see how many advertisers will stop buying commercial time on Fox News. (grin)

This one island of dissent in a sea of media leftism sameness, the the leftist mob just can stand it.
The leftist mob would rather have only their approved political views and their approved thought in the media, actively working to squash and destroy any views and thoughts that aren't theirs.

All the more reason for Fox News and its continued existence. If nothing else but to continue to be the sand in the leftist's underwear.
 
Its gonna depend.....

I could choose to still advertise on Fox and demand that my ads not be run during his show. Enough of that happens, and its gonna put Fox in an untenable situation.

Yeah, right ... keep on wriggling ... :lol:
 
Tucker Carlson could’ve meant that we should wait and see if he’s guilty, like the justice system is supposed to do. Now we know he is convicted.

Dragging stuff up from decades ago, taking it grossly out of context to enrage useful idiots into fauxrage spasms is hardly a question for the justice system.
It's more a question for the useful idiots to ask themselves.
 
Tucker Carlson could’ve meant that we should wait and see if he’s guilty, like the justice system is supposed to do. Now we know he is convicted.

Sounds like he was making the point that facilitating a marriage of a 16yo to a 27yo isn't the same as felony child rape, and he is right its not the same.
 
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. Trump is the same drooling idiot that stood in the middle of a wildfire decimated town named "Paradise" and called it "Pleasure". Twice.

Senility is clearly setting in.
 
If Sponsors are fleeing Carlson, he's a goner. That's what took down O'Reilly.

Fox is an immoral company, they don't care if their hosts promote child rape and misogyny, long as it brings home the bacon. If it stops bringing home the bacon, start shuffling some resumes.

A drawback of capitalism being its prioritization of profit over morality but, this is the world.
 
It makes sense. When you're in the business of serving customers, you can't afford an association with someone degrades and insults half of them.

That's why Hillary was beat by Trump
 
If Sponsors are fleeing Carlson, he's a goner. That's what took down O'Reilly.

Fox is an immoral company, they don't care if their hosts promote child rape and misogyny, long as it brings home the bacon. If it stops bringing home the bacon, start shuffling some resumes.

A drawback of capitalism being its prioritization of profit over morality but, this is the world.

Other sponsors will take their place
 
Back
Top Bottom