Trump wants civil war

[Glitch]

Right wing extremists are responsible for the overwhelming majority of domestic terror attacks that also result in death.

ROFL! That is a flat out lie.

 

[Cardinal]

How many deaths are there from that -compared to inner city gangs killing other gangsters as well as innocents in order to perpetuate and pay for drug trafficking? And what do you think the political leanings are of those killers?

Your post doesn’t change the fact that right wing extremists are responsible for the overwhelming majority of domestic terror attacks that also result in death.

 

[TurtleDude]

Your post doesn’t change the fact that right wing extremists are responsible for the overwhelming majority of domestic terror attacks that also result in death.

I suspect that is because liberals only will call something domestic terrorism if they can blame it on right wingers. shoot an abortion clinic up-has to be rightwing. Shoot police officers and the left claims that is just simple criminal activity.

 

[Cardinal]

I suspect that is because liberals only will call something domestic terrorism if they can blame it on right wingers. shoot an abortion clinic up-has to be rightwing. Shoot police officers and the left claims that is just simple criminal activity.

So basically you just don’t want to call what right wing extremists do “terrorism” then.

 

[Jay59]

We get it, neo-nazi's are your friend and some of them are very fine people. :lol:

Which ones are we talking about? There can't be more than 50 to choose from.

Right wing extremists are responsible for the overwhelming majority of domestic terror attacks that also result in death.

You say this after El Paso and Dayton, both by left wing exremists. :roll:

 

[Cardinal]

Which ones are we talking about? There can't be more than 50 to choose from.


You say this after El Paso and Dayton, both by left wing exremists. :roll:

Where’d you hear that? Tucker Carlson?

 

[TurtleDude]

So basically you just don’t want to call what right wing extremists do “terrorism” then.

What I note is that your attempt to blame the right side of American politics with all acts of domestic terrorism is hilarious. Also hilarious is your studied ignoring of the fact that the vast majority of murders committed in the USA are not "terrorism" and not perpetrated by anyone remotely connected with conservatism.

 

[Jay59]

What I note is that your attempt to blame the right side of American politics with all acts of domestic terrorism is hilarious. Also hilarious is your studied ignoring of the fact that the vast majority of murders committed in the USA are not "terrorism" and not perpetrated by anyone remotely connected with conservatism.

He just takes the position that active shooter implies right wing, and the hell with facts.

 

[TurtleDude]

He just takes the position that active shooter implies right wing, and the hell with facts.

Yeah like that guy who shot of the GOP softball game :mrgreen:

 

[Cardinal]

What I note is that your attempt to blame the right side of American politics with all acts of domestic terrorism is hilarious. Also hilarious is your studied ignoring of the fact that the vast majority of murders committed in the USA are not "terrorism" and not perpetrated by anyone remotely connected with conservatism.

It’s because terrorism has a meaning, and yes, right wing extremists are primarily responsible for it now. You don’t get to use a different word because of the inconvenience of your side’s extremists being responsible for most of the domestic terrorism. Palestinians claim that their extremists aren’t “terrorists,” and nobody’s buying their nonsense either.

 

[Cardinal]

Yeah like that guy who shot of the GOP softball game :mrgreen:

Did I claim that we had no wackos of our own? Why no, I did not.

 

[Jay59]

Where’d you hear that? Tucker Carlson?

I actually know who Tucker Carlson is now. A couple weeks ago I wouldn't have.

The El Paso shooters put out a manifesto. He was a Gore disciple--he called his manifesto The Inconvenient Truth--and a sustainability nut. His mission was to stop new people from overloading the resources of the country by sealing the border. That's a left-wing radical by any standard. The Dayton guy may or may not have been Antifa, but he was certainly posting his praises.

I checked the facts. Try it sometime.

 

[TurtleDude]

It’s because terrorism has a meaning, and yes, right wing extremists are primarily responsible for it now. You don’t get to use a different word because of the inconvenience of your side’s extremists being responsible for most of the domestic terrorism. Palestinians claim that their extremists aren’t “terrorists,” and nobody’s buying their nonsense either.

what side was the dayton shooter on? Has it ever occurred to you that people who shoot up a school or a store are really out there and really cannot be pigeonholed into one side or the other. One clown used to constantly claim that the guy who shot Giffords and murdered a REPUBLICAN Judge was a "tea bagger" when it was shown that the killer was an atheist whose politics were contradictory and really couldn't be pegged as belonging to any definable side.

 

[Cardinal]

I actually know who Tucker Carlson is now. A couple weeks ago I wouldn't have.

The El Paso shooters put out a manifesto. He was a Gore disciple--he called his manifesto The Inconvenient Truth--and a sustainability nut. His mission was to stop new people from overloading the resources of the country by sealing the border. That's a left-wing radical by any standard. The Dayton guy may or may not have been Antifa, but he was certainly posting his praises.

I checked the facts. Try it sometime.

So he was an anti immigrant nut. Huh, I wonder which side of the political aisle that sounds like.

 

[Cardinal]

what side was the dayton shooter on? Has it ever occurred to you that people who shoot up a school or a store are really out there and really cannot be pigeonholed into one side or the other. One clown used to constantly claim that the guy who shot Giffords and murdered a REPUBLICAN Judge was a "tea bagger" when it was shown that the killer was an atheist whose politics were contradictory and really couldn't be pegged as belonging to any definable side.

You’re trying to get me to argue that there are zero extremists on the left side of the aisle. Sorry, turtle, it won’t work. As I said, the overwhelming majority of domestic terror incidents are caused by right wing extremists. “Overwhelming majority” does not equal “all.”

 

[TurtleDude]

You’re trying to get me to argue that there are zero extremists on the left side of the aisle. Sorry, turtle, it won’t work. As I said, the overwhelming majority of domestic terror incidents are caused by right wing extremists. “Overwhelming majority” does not equal “all.”

I deny your claim that the overwhelming majority are on the right side

 

[Cardinal]

I deny your claim that the overwhelming majority are on the right side

So? Palestinians often reject that what their extremists do is called “terrorism,” or that their terrorists are radicalized by more extreme versions of their own belief systems. Your denial isn’t new or unique.

 

[Glitch]

I deny your claim that the overwhelming majority are on the right side

You have to remember the mentality you're dealing with here. These people actually believe the National SOCIALIST Movement are right-wingers. LOL!

 

[Jay59]

So he was an anti immigrant nut. Huh, I wonder which side of the political aisle that sounds like.

He was an eco-terrorist, focused on overcrowding. Far to the left. Ralph Nader territory.

So? Palestinians often reject that what their extremists do is called “terrorism,” or that their terrorists are radicalized by more extreme versions of their own belief systems. Your denial isn’t new or unique.

Nor is yours.

 

[Mycroft]

So he was an anti immigrant nut. Huh, I wonder which side of the political aisle that sounds like.

Sounds to me like you've never considered the possibility that an anti-immigrant nut can be a left-wing nut job. shrug... All you have to do is read that guy's manifesto to know it is not only possible, but is a reality.

 

[Cardinal]

He was an eco-terrorist. Definitely far to the left.

Sure, you tell yourself that.

"In general, I support the Christchurch shooter and his manifesto. This attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas. They are the instigators, not me. I am simply defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an invasion," the manifesto said.

The document said the lengthy manifesto written by the accused Christchurch shooter, called "The Great Replacement," inspired him to target the Hispanic community. That 74-page manifesto hailed President Trump as a "symbol of renewed white identity" and expressed hope the attack would spark a second civil war in the United States.

El Paso suspect reportedly wrote four-page racist, anti-immigrant manifesto before attack

 

[Cardinal]

Sounds to me like you've never considered the possibility that an anti-immigrant nut can be a left-wing nut job. shrug... All you have to do is read that guy's manifesto to know it is not only possible, but is a reality.

Lol, trump supporters will say anything.

 

[Jay59]

Sure, you tell yourself that.

I do, because I actually checked. You, not so much.

Lol, trump supporters will say anything.

They tend to be closer to the truth than Democrats in general. Mostly because hate is not a driving motivation for Trump supporters like it is for the Democrat/Media complex.

 

[VanceMack]

Watching the stupidity in this thread....


You ****ing people are embarrassing.

 

[Craig234]

Trump wants civil war. He thinks it's a winning campaign strategy for him.

Lincoln -> seen as greatest president -> civil war! It's bigger than Lincoln's!