Really!? That lady stepped into a political ****storm willingly
How dare she not show the man the proper respect of accusing him when she was most likely to be ignored, shamed, and attacked. What a poopooface!
Really!? and she wonders why she is covered in ****.
Surely, you aren't saying something like "The swamp I pretend to hate is bad when I hate it, but when it protects something I do not like, I like it!" in a Freudian sort of way. Surely, no?
"Festival of ****" doesn't fairly describe congress but that's hardly a reason to defend it having ***
* (those are different-tense asterixes; see accent on the fourth) on someone in particular....
She waits 30+ years, NOW she steps forward.
30+ years and he wasn't nominated to SCOTUS, meanwhile she moved across the country and to all accounts was quite severely traumatized, no matter how one might rate the traumatization of someone else of failing to die when they thought they might... ok well...let's see
:thinking
Ok, yes, maybe it makes sense that someone who was severely traumatized would wait for something extreme to happen to come forward because pain duh pain.
Real women AND men come forward immediately, because they understand the implications of NOT regardless their comfort. If they wait till decades later thats on them.
Mmm...she's a fake woman now? Interesting theory.
Or is that she's not strong enough to survive an alleged attempted rape without some damage, and too blinkered to have saved us all this exasperating trouble by getting her story laughed off a few decades ago?
Perhaps she's a Liberal and manufactured all of this, just to victimize a conservative............unlike Gorsuch.
Or she's immoral for delaying a confused disclosure, which according to US Attornies approved of by the same GOP senators fighting this, and all sorts of state experts, is perfectly understandable for a sexually assaulted person. Perhaps Kavanaugh presided over such a trial. Who am I to say? But I'm not about to cut some guy subject only to a political vote slack that people in criminal trials with the supposed benefit of "presumption of innocence" only rebutted by "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" get when that guy is a judge.
Sexual assault aside, his stupid and pointless but prideful lying about youthful drinking - that wouldn't be a matter of public concern if admitted - should throw up red flags. So too should his little petulances at the beginning. But I digress....
They have no sympathy from me. Ms. Ford has no sympathy from me. As far as I am concerned she is con artist hired by the democrats, a paid character assassin. She has earned all the enmity headed her way.
Well, they do seem to be getting rather sick of looking for your "sympathy", don't they?
Is not their message "hey, ****er, I'm half the population. So enough of the doing of bad stuff that decent human beings don't do, and enough of the protecting each other for it"?
I mean, they're not asking what kind of sandwich dear might want.....
How long does this game work, in your reckoning?
