Trump loses at Supreme Court - NY DA will receive Trump financial records.

[digitusmedius]

I think that's been debunked already.

By whom....Dirtbag? A denial is not a debunking.

 

[digitusmedius]

He can’t be pardoned for state level crimes unless it’s by the governor, which isn’t happening.


I’m still somewhat torn about prosecuting him. I have a really bad feeling this is going to hit the fan if that happens. It’s a lose lose situation

If by "he" you mean Dirtbag Donnie let the chips fall. His ass has been overdue for a jail cell for decades.

 

[digitusmedius]

psychobabble-what objective harm has he caused you?

Wow, you sure ran away from that question in a big hurry. That tells us more than if you'd have tried to bull**** your way out of it.

 

[Integrityrespec]

Not surprising 7-2


https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-635_o7jq.pdf

Maybe, maybe not! It goes back to lower court and the Trump legal team can present further arguments agains the subpoena. So at best it will be months and possibly years as the court also said the President cannot be held to a higher standard than anyone else under the law, and that the investigations and subpoena's must be grounded in real evidence and not just a fishing expedition. So as usual democrats/liberals and Trump haters overestimate what is happening.

 

[digitusmedius]

Poor poor pitiful me. And with that ruling the supreme court has become a hoax, what's next on the hoax list?

So you mean even Dirtbag's own choices for the court were a hoax? Then that would mean he played a hoax on himself. That hoax meme was carcass on arrival the first time Dirtbag and his toadies started using it and a million of so times since then has not improved its looks.

 

[digitusmedius]

If Trump's financials are leaked, we know who leaked them: The NY DA. Good thing congress didn't get access to Trump's financials because there would be a ****storm of leaking.:roll:

The way your Dear Dirtbag has made enemies in his own party and staff makes the number of people who'd be able and happy to leak on him (literally as well as figuratively) must be into the four digits by now.

 

[BlueTex]

Maybe, maybe not! It goes back to lower court and the Trump legal team can present further arguments agains the subpoena. So at best it will be months and possibly years as the court also said the President cannot be held to a higher standard than anyone else under the law, and that the investigations and subpoena's must be grounded in real evidence and not just a fishing expedition. So as usual democrats/liberals and Trump haters overestimate what is happening.

Let's test your knowledge of grand jury subpoenas... What arguments do you think they will make?

They will get their chance next week...

July 16 Hearing Set in N.Y. Trump Tax Case After Supreme Court Ruling

 

[Roadvirus]

By whom....Dirtbag? A denial is not a debunking.

The wife of the person who supposedly took the SATs for him says the accusation is crap.

 

[digitusmedius]

The wife of the person who supposedly took the SATs for him says the accusation is crap.

The wife? Sure it wasn't a cousin or "some guy" said? C'mon. If you're gonna bull**** you've got to do better than that. That's just pure laziness.

 

[cabse5]

The way your Dear Dirtbag has made enemies in his own party and staff makes the number of people who'd be able and happy to leak on him (literally as well as figuratively) must be into the four digits by now.

Guess they can temp breaking the law by leaking. No one's above the law, right?:roll:

 

[TurtleDude]

Wow, you sure ran away from that question in a big hurry. That tells us more than if you'd have tried to bull**** your way out of it.

wrong-you spewed idiocy about Trump and it never answered MY question

 

[digitusmedius]

wrong-you spewed idiocy about Trump and it never answered MY question

So dodge my question and demand I answer to your horse****. You people are nothing if not brazen in your Cultishness.