• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Insults Several Million American Jews

You're not in a position to be giving any medals. Dismissed!!!:2wave:

I guess beating bear poker in a debate doesn't require much skill so perhaps I overestimated you and should have waited before giving you that gold medal.
 
Multiple people have already linked multiple times to things detailing it. I have no reason to provide information to people that wish to stay ignorant in their understanding of issues. Its not my job to educate people especially considering they refuse to even look at anything that goes against their preconceived notions of what is going on in the world.

Cop out. You can't answer it. That's the bottom line. You make a claim, the onus is on you, no one else, to back up that claim.
 
Cop out. You can't answer it. That's the bottom line. You make a claim, the onus is on you, no one else, to back up that claim.

Sue me. I don't need to waste my time. Its like proving 2 +2 = 4. If you are arguing with people with little knowledge of the world around them, its better to just let them live in their ignorance.
 
I guess beating bear poker in a debate doesn't require much skill so perhaps I overestimated you and should have waited before giving you that gold medal.

Are you in the habit of presenting gold medals? Very un-egalitarian of you.
 
Accusing the Jewish community of disloyalty is literally how the persecution of the Jewish people began under the Nazi party. And also this is similar to the kind of comment Trump and his allies have attacked Omar for.



He's also accusing Americans of being disloyal to a foreign country...And he's actually accusing Democrats of being disloyal to him... The tinfoil hat dictator.

Trump Insults Several Million American Jews


This also isn't a very good re-election strategy.
The title is misleading Trump did not insult jews he shamed the ones who vote for democrats. He insulted the Democrats by calling them antisemites.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
So saying that I had no idea what I said, and then asking for validation of something that you've most likely already made your mind up on, no to mention you'll probably attempt to twist around for your own agenda...

Yeah, you should've just come out with that question on your first post.

Sure I could have asked the question but your post was so incredible it's like looking at a car wreck.
 
Sue me. I don't need to waste my time. Its like proving 2 +2 = 4. If you are arguing with people with little knowledge of the world around them, its better to just let them live in their ignorance.

Another cop out.


If someone making a claim, the onus is always on the person making the claim to back it up.

Self puffery, in all of its flavors (puffing oneself up by belittling or shaming others, claiming one does not have to back up one's claim because the opponent is ignorant and that if he or she only read the news, that person would agree with you), is never a merit worthy argument. In fact, it's a ridiculous argument. You are not the arbiter of knowledge.

Indeed, it is the quintessential cop out. If reveals YOUR ignorance of valid debate method.

Put up or shut up, as they say.
 
Another cop out.


If someone making a claim, the onus is always on the person making the claim to back it up.

Self puffery, in all of its flavors (puffing oneself up by belittling or shaming others, claiming one does not have to back up one's claim because the opponent is ignorant and that if he or she only read the news, that person would agree with you), is never a merit worthy argument. In fact, it's a ridiculous argument. You are not the arbiter of knowledge.

Indeed, it is the quintessential cop out. If reveals YOUR ignorance of valid debate method.

Put up or shut up, as they say.

Mate, I literally do not care what you think. You can stop wasting your time trying to argue pointless things acting like its some duty of mine to educate someone that has completely ignored legitimate sources and statements that people have already posted.

If you don't like that, well frankly I don't give a ****. Get over yourself.
 
Mate, I literally do not care what you think. You can stop wasting your time trying to argue pointless things acting like its some duty of mine to educate someone that has completely ignored legitimate sources and statements that people have already posted.

If you don't like that, well frankly I don't give a ****. Get over yourself.

Of course you give a ****, or you wouldn't have replied.

Deflection is a form of cop out.

You're pretty good at this.

Like I said, put up or shut up.

But, shut up is the path you have chosen.

Thank you for proving my point.
 
The title is misleading Trump did not insult jews he shamed the ones who vote for democrats. He insulted the Democrats by calling them antisemites.

He insulted Jews for voting Democrats. He called them traitors. Spin it any famn way you want. Who the hell is Trump to shame anyone? Your attitude on this is nothing short of appalling.
 
He insulted Jews for voting Democrats. He called them traitors. Spin it any famn way you want. Who the hell is Trump to shame anyone? Your attitude on this is nothing short of appalling.

Politics is about winning, haven't you been watching the Democrats?
 
He insulted Jews for voting Democrats. He called them traitors. Spin it any famn way you want. Who the hell is Trump to shame anyone? Your attitude on this is nothing short of appalling.
What do you think, the the left has a monopoly on shaming people they disagree with. The left has been accusing him and his base of being mysognistic, facist, racist, xenophobic, white supremacist, homophobic, traitors for years and your panties are in a wad caused he called the left antisemites.

I'm glad you feel offended by his remarks, now you know how it feels to be called all the ugly things people on the right are labled as. Unfortunately though i doubt the left wil learn the lesson here and they will continue to double down on their hate.

You can spare me your fake morale outrage and virtue signaling as if you occupy some moral highground because you don't. Your just mad that Trump has turned the tables and the left has found themselves on the recieving end of the idenity politics that they love so much to play.

People like you disgust me. You have no right to be appalled with anything when you go along with it as it gets dished out from the left. This is only a mild dose of what the left does, get back to me when you're prepared to codemn both sides and reject all forms of it, until then i say the right needs to do it more.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Politics is about winning, haven't you been watching the Democrats?
It's called offense.

Make Jews defend their support for Democrats. Make Democrats defend their policies especially relative to Israel to Jews.

Just like asking African Americans "what do you have to lose?"

Shake the tree. I'd like to see him rally in California; shake that tree too.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
 
It's called offense.

Make Jews defend their support for Democrats. Make Democrats defend their policies especially relative to Israel to Jews.

Just like asking African Americans "what do you have to lose?"

Shake the tree. I'd like to see him rally in California; shake that tree too.

Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

It's called antisemitism. It's an old old trope about "disloyal" Jews.
 
Last edited:
No they're not. They are to the far right of the political spectrum. Which means that today's Conservatives are by far much closer to that end of the political spectrum than ANY of the Democratic candidates.

history says otherwise. there is no way that mousillini and hilter would have gotten along as well as they did if they were not of the same political alignment.
both were major socialists and have admitted as such not only in their policies but in their views as well.

Actually the exact opposite is correct.

All of the democratic candidates are basically running on government controlled everything.
 
I said it was propaganda that masked their real intentions. Wait wait do you think harkening back to an imaginary past means the quote is imaginary? :lamo You failed again.

again what you say it is not an argument. I say so is not an argument for anything.
i showed you the evidence and the historical references.

yes you failed to prove anything since i say so is not never has been an argument or rebuttal in fact it is a fallacy.
 
again what you say it is not an argument. I say so is not an argument for anything.
i showed you the evidence and the historical references.

yes you failed to prove anything since i say so is not never has been an argument or rebuttal in fact it is a fallacy.

No i dont understand what you are calling imaginary because what you are referring to and what i am referring to are different. The **** are you on? Im repeating what i said, never said i said so is evidence. Keep up the weird strawmen tho. Learn to read. Ill get you some hooked on phonics if you want!
 
Sure I could have asked the question but your post was so incredible it's like looking at a car wreck.

Seeing as you didn't show how I was wrong.

I'd have to say that my driving record is still good at the point.
 
Seeing as you didn't show how I was wrong.

I'd have to say that my driving record is still good at the point.

I see that you didn't see me pointing out how you're wrong. And I noticed you haven't answered my question. Trying to avoid it?
 
I see that you didn't see me pointing out how you're wrong. And I noticed you haven't answered my question. Trying to avoid it?

Because I don't care for Trumps opinion. The moment he starts touting such as fact, then my opinion on what's being said will change.

Do you mind attempting to point out how I was wrong once more?
 
Back
Top Bottom