• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump gives AG Barr authority to declassify documents related to 2016 campaign surveillance

Get a clue. Hillary didn't know anything about Trump's campaign being investigated over their contacts with Russian operatives until well after the election. She said if she had known about it she would've been shouting it from the rooftops. So much for the great Comey, Page, Strzok conspiracy theory, huh?
So you are denying that Hillary Clinton campaign received a dossier from the derived by Russians.
 
lol....NO....But I would love to see you attempt to articulate the "Harm" you think Trump has done with relationships as you claim....

FiveEyes is gonna get scrapped because members of the Trump campaign got bit in the ass by it.
 
a dossier from the derived by Russians.

If you didn't need to use so many weasel words, you wouldn't have tripped over yourself in that sentence.
 
LOL! What's a few people? Congress? Impeachment is the legal and constitutional way and the way the process is outlined in the Constitution there is no possibility that only a few people would be able to remove a President from office. Being duly elected doesn't shield one from being held accountable for whatever high crimes and misdemeanors he or she may have committed before or after taking office.
Those few people were trying to frame Trump so he could be impeached.
 
FiveEyes is gonna get scrapped because members of the Trump campaign got bit in the ass by it.
That is total nonsense. Five Eyes acted unethically. They won't be scrapped but a few heads may roll. And that would not be a bad thing.
 
That is total nonsense. Five Eyes acted unethically. They won't be scrapped but a few heads may roll. And that would not be a bad thing.

How did they act unethically?
 
Oh look you caught a typo and it made your day. :lamo

Why don't you try to rephrase the question honestly, and I'll attempt to answer it?
 
Ladies and gentlemen, we no longer have an independent department of Justice.
I'd disagree with that. While one can have their disagreements and whatnot, each President puts people in Cabinet positions that will help them in furthering their agenda. That's just how it is and Trump isn't any different.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 
Heck he was calling it a witch hunt before he even took office.

Well, the investigation didn't start until trump admitted he fired Comey for not dropping the investigation so that's a bit of an exaggeration, my friend :)
 
By spying on US citizens without a proper predicate.

Papadopoulos blabbed to an Australian while drunk in a bar, should Australia have sat on that information?
 
Well, the investigation didn't start until trump admitted he fired Comey for not dropping the investigation so that's a bit of an exaggeration, my friend :)
Trump was under investigation prior to that I'd bet he considers the whole thing a witch hunt.
 
Well, the investigation didn't start until trump admitted he fired Comey for not dropping the investigation so that's a bit of an exaggeration, my friend :)
Hard to argue that the investigation hadnt begun while claiming Trump fired Comey for not stopping the investigation. Plus, if you read the Mueller report, they concluded that Trump fired Comey because Comey would not say publicly what he told Trump in private--that Trump was not under investigation.
 
I'd disagree with that. While one can have their disagreements and whatnot, each President puts people in Cabinet positions that will help them in furthering their agenda. That's just how it is and Trump isn't any different.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

The position of US attorney general, in principle, is changed with upholding the u.s constitution. The department of Justice should not be used to attack the political opponents of the president.
 
Trump was under investigation prior to that I'd bet he considers the whole thing a witch hunt.

Sure because our allies were jumping up and down warning our intelligence agencies that people in trump's campaign were meeting with a hostile foreign power.
 
Hard to argue that the investigation hadnt begun while claiming Trump fired Comey for not stopping the investigation. Plus, if you read the Mueller report, they concluded that Trump fired Comey because Comey would not say publicly what he told Trump in private--that Trump was not under investigation.

That's true.
 
So you are denying that Hillary Clinton campaign received a dossier from the derived by Russians.

Russian informants not the Russian Govt. You keep forgetting that Putin said he wanted Trump to win at Helsinki.
 
Hard to argue that the investigation hadnt begun while claiming Trump fired Comey for not stopping the investigation. Plus, if you read the Mueller report, they concluded that Trump fired Comey because Comey would not say publicly what he told Trump in private--that Trump was not under investigation.

The investigation was into members of the Trump campaign first. Yet when they fired Comey they first tried to claim that it was because of how Comey dealt with the Clinton investigation prior to the election. Then, the very next day, Trump has Kislyak and Lavrov in the Oval, only lets in Russian press, and tells them “He was crazy, a real nut job. I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off."

Maybe, just maybe if Trump could be even slightly consistent, and not lie constantly, he wouldn't arouse so much suspicion.
 
The position of US attorney general, in principle, is changed with upholding the u.s constitution. The department of Justice should not be used to attack the political opponents of the president.
I'd agree with that, however, if one looks historically the DOJ was used to attack groups and individuals disliked by the President, a main example is COINTELPRO.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom