- Joined
- Jan 31, 2013
- Messages
- 32,758
- Reaction score
- 23,888
- Location
- Georgia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
I'm not arguing that because of course that's the basic strategy. I've lived through many 'shutdowns' as well and read the news.
I don't know why you quoted me and ignored my point. I said they are needlessly disruptive, if they last long will harm lots of businesses around here, and all over the country, and aren't harmless stunts. I didn't argue they were doom and gloom, but maybe if you had a hotel and half cancelled at Christmas because the national park closes down, the $5,000 a night in cancelled rooms to your little business in an otherwise busy holiday season is "doom and gloom" for that business, if not the country.
What I'm trying to explain is the "no big deal" story you're telling about your own experience during a shutdown is most definitely NOT the experience of local businesses around here near the park. You can argue it's worth the trouble, or you don't give a damn about them because you got paid for the time off, but I can promise you the locals all around here will suffer ACTUAL harm that they'll never recover if the government is shut down and the national parks are, like they always have been, part of that shutdown. They don't get a do-over for the cancelled Christmas holiday traffic in mid January.
I buy the needless part 100%. If congress was doing their jobs, there wouldn't be a shutdown, period.