- Joined
- Mar 27, 2014
- Messages
- 65,196
- Reaction score
- 35,399
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
IF they believed it for even a minute, having DHS and SS assure her that security wasn't a concern should have prompted a retraction. Instead, Pelosi doubled down today. When asked, she explained *a* DHS employee contacted me and expressed concern. So, ONE anonymous person tells Pelosi she's concerned, and Pelosi tells Trump to postpone.
Who's buying that load of happy horse****?
Yeah, I mean seriously. Seems to me the way to motivate 100s of people to do an extraordinary job protecting the entire government is to not pay them for a month and threaten to not pay them for months longer until you get your way. Worrying about defaulting on debts, paying for medical bills, school tuition, all that cannot be a distraction to these workers! And clearly it's no ethical problem to ask unpaid workers to work long overtime and give their best with no pay and no way to know when they'll next see the paycheck they're earning!
More seriously, I have a problem with "let's shut down government, but keep open all the stuff that I care about!" approach in general. It's just a charade. If we can force "essential" personnel, such as those tasked with protecting this gala celebration called the SOTU address, to stay on the job because we'd be very inconvenienced if we actually "closed" closed government, instead of fake closed it except for the part POTUS at that time wants open, then we damn sure ought to find a way to pay them while they're WORKING. As is, we're using people with no power to resolve this conflict as the pawns, the victims.