Trump about Parkland: I really believe I’d run in there even if I didn’t have a weapon

[RamFel]

Really?

You have that kind of time to spend on exchanging opinions on Trump's character?

I don't. It has been clearly determined he is a waste of skin who would sell out his best friend, just like the prick sold out America's best friend this afternoon by announcing a 25% tariff on steel....without prior notice.

That's being a huge prick. It's one thing to hit a trading partner, but to deal in secret as he has done shows EXACTLY what character he has. Should your air space ever get shut down again as they were in 2011, don't expect Canada to take in your stranded travelers.

Good bye

Thanks..

 

[d0gbreath]

Trump would run into the school unarmed, if, and only if, the shooter was chasing him.

 

[tres borrachos]

During a White House event with the nations governors, POTUS 45 said that he would have run in there without a weapon and would have confronted the shooter.

Now I do not know if he meant to imply that he would do that in this day and age or when he was "younger" but it is a bold statement to say the least from a man who once said:



Or who said about an event at Mar-a-lago when some person fell of the stage, where he looked away from the man when he started bleeding, saying:



So let us talk about this because he has made this a "thing", would a 70+ puffy moderately obese man with no combat training go in and confront a 19 year old young person with an AR-15 while he was shooting it wildly around?

Because I do not believe that is something Trump, a man who got deferred several times on the grounds of bone-spurs would be a person that would run into the path of a AR-15 wielding mad man. How about you?

Please tell me that not a single person in the free world with an IQ over 50 believed him when he said that. This is the same man who refused to help an 80 year old man who was bleeding on his marble floor.

 

[Real Korimyr #9]

The poll question asks what we would do if we were unarmed. I am never unarmed.

And yes, I think I would rush in-- regardless of how well armed I was-- but confronting the shooter is the last item on my agenda and I'm only going to risk it if I've got a clean shot at his back.

Because, otherwise, there are other victims in the area and getting my ass shot off means I'm not helping them anymore.

POTUS 45 said that he would have run in there without a weapon and would have confronted the shooter.

President Trump wouldn't need a weapon to stop the shooter. He'd rush right into the oncoming fire, dodging the shooter's bullets like they were draft notices.

Your making a big deal about him and what he said.

Yes, because he was elected to the single most powerful and important office in all of human civilization and saying stuff is his entire ****ing job.

Every idiotic, senile, festering heap of bull**** that drips out of his open mouth has consequences for the lives and liberty of people all around the world. If he is not competent enough to be held accountable for every stupid and/or dishonest statement he makes, he is not competent enough to be occupying the office of the President of the United States.

Stop making excuses for the GOP's mistakes.

 

[Peter King]

Please tell me that not a single person in the free world with an IQ over 50 believed him when he said that. This is the same man who refused to help an 80 year old man who was bleeding on his marble floor.

3 people voted that they believed Trump would (and one voted additionally by accident) so three people believe him. They undoubtedly have an IQ over 50, far more I would assume but still, they say they believe the 70 year old person would "run" into a school shooting without being armed himself.

 

[year2late]

Please tell me that not a single person in the free world with an IQ over 50 believed him when he said that. This is the same man who refused to help an 80 year old man who was bleeding on his marble floor.

Frankly, I do not fault him for physically not helping him.....a little empathy would be fine.