• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This is how STUPID that IDIOT MORON Trump is ... he's Telling where are Subs are!

Cigar said:
Trump tells Duterte of two U.S. nuclear subs in Korean waters:

Trump tells Duterte of two U.S. nuclear subs in Korean waters: NYT | Reuters

What a F'ing Idiot ... :doh
Click to expand...

I was much more disturbed that he was discussing things with Duterte than what he said about the subs. But the msm are whipping up a mountain out of a molehill again and are making the Country look undependable. This is just what Putin would want, but it is as irresponsible as can be of our liberal media.
 
This is how STUPID that IDIOT MORON Trump is ... he's Telling where are Subs are!
Click to expand...

Oh the irony. :roll:
 
apdst said:
And the leakers you all admire so much just told the entire world. Great job! Was smearing the president really worth it?
Click to expand...

WFT are you talking about ... leaks?

This is coming directly from the Idiot own mouth. :lamo
 
Cigar said:
WFT are you talking about ... leaks?

This is coming directly from the Idiot own mouth. :lamo
Click to expand...

Yeah...leaks...lol! This private phonecall was leaked to the media. How do you think YOU found out about it?

The real idiots are the leakers for leaking the information and the media for publishing it.

These clowns are endandering American lives, just so they can undermine the president.
 
eohrnberger said:
More anonymous sources. You guys are so easily fooled and so easily goaded into fauxrage.
Click to expand...

Until these anonymous sources you guys love to bash are debunked, why should we doubt them? I haven't had any reason to otherwise. There have been plenty of frauds claiming damaging stories were real from your side from pizzagate to seth rich. Can you point to one anon source that has been found to be false since Trump was elected?
 
Absentglare said:
No, not at all. That's the stupidest argument i've seen today. That is literally the worst way to issue a "warning" to North Korea "hey guys, we only have two subs out there, and we'd rather not use them anyway."
Click to expand...

It would behove you to understand what a carrier strike group sometimes consists of.
 
Cigar said:
Really, that's your first reaction, defend and deflect. :roll:

NO ONE EVER Publicly says where our Subs are ... NEVER EVER, especially The Commander In Chief :doh

You might want to look it up or talk to someone in The Navy.
Click to expand...

It doesn't look like it was said publicly.

Is that your beef with this story?
 
ModerateGOP said:
Until these anonymous sources you guys love to bash are debunked, why should we doubt them? I haven't had any reason to otherwise. There have been plenty of frauds claiming damaging stories were real from your side from pizzagate to seth rich. Can you point to one anon source that has been found to be false since Trump was elected?
Click to expand...

These anonymous sources have far too often been red herrings, and rightfully have lost all credibility.

About as much credibility as 'Rosenstein threatened to quit over Comey memo'
(Rosenstein said he didn't).

About as much credibility as 'Comey was going to ask for more money for Russian collusion investigation'
(McCabe testifies to congress the investigation properly resources)

About as much credibility as 'Trump obstructed justice by telling Comey to stop investigation of Flynn'
(Comey testifies before congress that no one interfered or obstructed the Flynn investigation)

Trump gave classified secrets to the Russians during their White House meeting
(McMaster later game out and no that didn’t happen, and he WAS in those meetings)

Face it. Today’s ‘news’ media is little more than leftist political propaganda gushing forth from their idea bubble / liberal-progressive echo chamber talking points, and no longer have any credibility.
 
eohrnberger said:
These anonymous sources have far too often been red herrings, and rightfully have lost all credibility.

About as much credibility as 'Rosenstein threatened to quit over Comey memo'
(Rosenstein said he didn't).

About as much credibility as 'Comey was going to ask for more money for Russian collusion investigation'
(McCabe testifies to congress the investigation properly resources)

About as much credibility as 'Trump obstructed justice by telling Comey to stop investigation of Flynn'
(Comey testifies before congress that no one interfered or obstructed the Flynn investigation)

Trump gave classified secrets to the Russians during their White House meeting
(McMaster later game out and no that didn’t happen, and he WAS in those meetings)

Face it. Today’s ‘news’ media is little more than leftist political propaganda gushing forth from their idea bubble / liberal-progressive echo chamber talking points, and no longer have any credibility.
Click to expand...

White House officials (people Trump pays) disputing anonymous sources (to do this) doesn't prove your point and doesn't answer my question. Why shouldn't we trust anonymous sources? Is your answer really, the government tells the truth? Really? That's rich coming from a conservative.
 
ModerateGOP said:
White House officials (people Trump pays) disputing anonymous sources (to do this) doesn't prove your point and doesn't answer my question. Why shouldn't we trust anonymous sources? Is your answer really, the government tells the truth? Really? That's rich coming from a conservative.
Click to expand...

I thought my post was quite clear.

"Why shouldn't we trust anonymous sources?"
Because these anonymous sources, as of late, have exhibited a very poor track record of being correct or accurate.
 
eohrnberger said:
I thought my post was quite clear.

"Why shouldn't we trust anonymous sources?"
Because these anonymous sources, as of late, have exhibited a very poor track record of being correct or accurate.
Click to expand...

Just like the paid Trump supporters who spout lies?
 
hanger4 said:
Allow me to make this as simple as possible. A US carrier strike group often times contains submarines, the good guys and bad guys know this. On April 25 USS Michigan arrived at Busan S. Korea. On May 2 the USS Cheyenne arrived in Sasebo, Japan.

Trump Reveal Sensitive Information About US Nuclear Subs? | The Daily Caller

Trump said nothing that wasn't already known. Does this help ??
Click to expand...

You are rambling incoherently. Please try to follow the story.

The story is that President Trump told a foreign power where two of our submarines are secretly hiding for no discernible reason.
 
Absentglare said:
You are rambling incoherently. Please try to follow the story.

The story is that President Trump told a foreign power where two of our submarines are secretly hiding for no discernible reason.
Click to expand...

"secretly hiding"

You're right Absentglare, one was "secretly hiding" in Busan, South Korea and the other was "secretly hiding" in Sasebo, Japan, the US Navy said so. :rofl
 
Cigar said:
Trump tells Duterte of two U.S. nuclear subs in Korean waters:

Trump tells Duterte of two U.S. nuclear subs in Korean waters: NYT | Reuters

What a F'ing Idiot ... :doh
Click to expand...

Do you think randomly capitalizing words in the thread title will make it look more important?

What Trump said to Duterte was not much of a revelation, as any one with any knowledge of our forces could guess as much. Maybe instead of getting all spastic over every single little thing Trump does, you could maybe focus on the important stuff that actually ****ing matters. Right now you are like the perfect representation of how conservatives like to portray liberals.
 
hanger4 said:
"secretly hiding"

You're right Absentglare, one was "secretly hiding" in Busan, South Korea and the other was "secretly hiding" in Sasebo, Japan, the US Navy said so. :rofl
Click to expand...

You seem to think a submarine in dock in Busan proves that there are two submarines stationed off the coast of North Korea. This is, of course, laughably stupid.
 
Absentglare said:
You seem to think a submarine in dock in Busan proves that there are two submarines stationed off the coast of North Korea. This is, of course, laughably stupid.
Click to expand...

This whole thread is laughably stupid. Trump revealed nothing that wasn't already known. The carrier strike group was off the coast therefore the subs were off the coast.

BTW considering the fire power of an Ohio class sub and a Los Angeles class sub, being docked in Hawaii could be considered off the coast of Korea.

Also, I still can't find anywhere "secretly hiding" was stated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom