• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Zimmerman case disintegrates

sharon said:
It was $10K not a million and its over. No one is going to waste their life on George.

The next challenge is.. will the defense sell George out in an immunity hearing to trying and raise money?
Click to expand...

Say you are mistaken sharon, and I won't post the video of the Black Panther leader saying they were going to raise a million dollars for his head.
 
Grim17 said:
Say you are mistaken sharon, and I won't post the video of the Black Panther leader saying they were going to raise a million dollars for his head.
Click to expand...

LOLOL.. its crap and you know it.
 
sharon said:
LOLOL.. its crap and you know it.
Click to expand...

I was hoping to avoid proving you wrong and making you look bad again sharon, but since you have chosen to run away instead of just admit your mistake, here you go:

 
hawke812 said:
This is all Zimmer-supporters have, resorting to personal attacks:lol:

Their God-king George ZImmerman will soon be locked up. He can't escape justice:lol:
Click to expand...

False claims, childish behavior and complete ignorance of law procedure is what you bring to the table

Your beliefs and opinions aren't based on fact, they are based on emotion. Therefore, presenting you with facts won't do any good. You are not communicating on a factual level and the objective truth won't matter. About anything

Thus, your zero credibility on this issue
 
Grim17 said:
An innocent person wrongly charged, who was falsely portrayed as a racist murderer by our one sided national news media, that had every human rights group in the country screaming for his arrest along with a million dollar price tag on his head issued by the Black Panthers.
Click to expand...

1. Correctly charged
2. Murderer
3. No bounty on his head
 
hawke812 said:
1. Correctly charged
2. Murderer
3. No bounty on his head
Click to expand...

1. must be the right charge according to the State or they would not have filed that way:mrgreen:. That does not mean the person is guilty.
2. yet to be proven.
3. Care to explain this. "Over the weekend, members of the New Black Panther Party showed just how tense the situation in the Trayvon Martin shooting has gotten: They offered a $10,000 bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman, who shot and killed the unarmed teenager." New Black Panther Party Offers $10K Bounty For George Zimmerman : The Two-Way : NPR

So you have lied on point 3. That in itself makes you point 1 and 2 stance suspect.
 
mike2810 said:
1. must be the right charge according to the State or they would not have filed that way:mrgreen:. That does not mean the person is guilty.
2. yet to be proven.
3. Care to explain this. "Over the weekend, members of the New Black Panther Party showed just how tense the situation in the Trayvon Martin shooting has gotten: They offered a $10,000 bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman, who shot and killed the unarmed teenager." New Black Panther Party Offers $10K Bounty For George Zimmerman : The Two-Way : NPR

So you have lied on point 3. That in itself makes you point 1 and 2 stance suspect.
Click to expand...

Indeed, I incorrectly interpreted the term "bounty-on-head". I saw the video, and did not see them say "bounty on head", only capture.
 
Last edited:
mike2810 said:
1. must be the right charge according to the State or they would not have filed that way:mrgreen:. That does not mean the person is guilty.
2. yet to be proven.
3. Care to explain this. "Over the weekend, members of the New Black Panther Party showed just how tense the situation in the Trayvon Martin shooting has gotten: They offered a $10,000 bounty for the capture of George Zimmerman, who shot and killed the unarmed teenager." New Black Panther Party Offers $10K Bounty For George Zimmerman : The Two-Way : NPR

So you have lied on point 3. That in itself makes you point 1 and 2 stance suspect.
Click to expand...

The things a handful of idiots say in the heat of the moment should be taken with a grain of salt. I don't think George is in danger. He's not worth it. The law will deal with him one way or another.
 
sharon said:
The things a handful of idiots say in the heat of the moment should be taken with a grain of salt. I don't think George is in danger. He's not worth it. The law will deal with him one way or another.
Click to expand...

Ahh Sharon. As in most cases you missed the point of the post. Hawke stated there was no bounty on Z. The reply showed that was not true. The post could have been made "in the heat of the moment", but I doubt it.

Hawke at least responded his post was in error.
 
mike2810 said:
Ahh Sharon. As in most cases you missed the point of the post. Hawke stated there was no bounty on Z. The reply showed that was not true. The post could have been made "in the heat of the moment", but I doubt it.

Hawke at least responded his post was in error.
Click to expand...

They offered 10k for his capture.. not a million.. and frankly I am not much impressed with those idiot blowhards. They aren't going to harm George. Don't you know BS when you see it?
 
sharon said:
They offered 10k for his capture.. not a million.. and frankly I am not much impressed with those idiot blowhards. They aren't going to harm George. Don't you know BS when you see it?
Click to expand...

Sharon, open your brain up to what he is saying and not what you want it to say...

This has nothing at all to so with what he said or his point. Hawke simply stated there was no bounty and mike2810, simply corrected him as there was indeed a bounty. That's it.

Your information has nothing to do with it, as usual.

Stop overcomplicating simple things.
 
Last edited:
Black Manta said:
Sharon, open your brain up to what he is saying and not what you want it to say...

This has nothing at all to so with what he said or his point. Hawke simply stated there was not bounty and mike2810, simply corrected him as there was indeed a bounty. That's it.

Your information has nothing to do with it, as usual.

Stop overcomplicating simple things.
Click to expand...

So what? Do you expect perfection from Hawkes?
 
sharon said:
I don't have a lot of patience with hysterics.. I was dead center of a very costly RICO prosecution and my life was threatened for a period of a couple of years.
Click to expand...

Has again nothing to do with anything. Enough about you. I took us off topic.

Please continue with Zimmerman/Martin.
 
sharon said:
So what? Do you expect perfection from Hawkes?
Click to expand...

interesting comment.
No, I don't. Mearly correcting a statement
You seem to expect perfection from Z, now don't you?

.
 
sharon said:
They offered 10k for his capture.. not a million.. and frankly I am not much impressed with those idiot blowhards. They aren't going to harm George. Don't you know BS when you see it?
Click to expand...

They set out to raise a million dollars, as the video I posted confirmed sharon... Your belief that it was nothing but talk, is just as nieve and misguided as your belief that the evidence proves Zimmerman is guilty of murder.
 
Black Manta said:
This has nothing at all to so with what he said or his point. Hawke simply stated there was no bounty and mike2810, simply corrected him as there was indeed a bounty. That's it.
Click to expand...

I already stated I misinterpreted the phrase "bounty on his head", as the BP did not state those exact words, but instead used "reward for his capture".
 
hawke812 said:
I already stated I misinterpreted the phrase "bounty on his head", as the BP did not state those exact words, but instead used "reward for his capture".
Click to expand...

I understand this, it was not about you. It was about Sharon going completely of course.
 
hawke812 said:
I already stated I misinterpreted the phrase "bounty on his head", as the BP did not state those exact words, but instead used "reward for his capture".
Click to expand...

Which is the same as a bounty.
 
hawke812 said:
Yes, I already stated I misinterpreted a "bounty on his head" as something else.

Why not use the same words they used then?
Click to expand...
Why not then?
 
Now that the election's over, Zimmerman can no longer be used as America's first "White Hispanic" tool to drive ignorant Democrats to the polls.....


This was always entirely predictable.............
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom