• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Weak Foundation of Calls for Climate Action

vegas giants said:
Watts never graduated college


Hahahahaha
Click to expand...

That isn't the point. Why are you so incompetent in your assessments of evaluating a sites merit?

WUWT does very good at linking the source material. This last one I responded to had links to both Nature and PNAS.

I don't care what WUWT says anyway. I go to his source links and make my own evaluates. Unlike you, who just read what your bloggers say.

It wasn't too long ago, I made a post that didn't jive with what Anthony said. Did you fail to notice, or do you just ignore what people actually say?
 
Lord of Planar said:
That isn't the point. Why are you so incompetent in your assessments of evaluating a sites merit?

WUWT does very good at linking the source material. This last one I responded to had links to both Nature and PNAS.

I don't care what WUWT says anyway. I go to his source ,inks and make my own evaluates. Unlike you, who just read what your bloggers say.
Click to expand...

Awwwww. You're upset your leader is a dropout. Lol
 
vegas giants said:
Awwwww. You're upset your leader is a dropout. Lol
Click to expand...

OMG.

Are you really that inept at comprehension skills that you believe he is my leader?

LOL...

You are even more wasted than I thought!
 
vegas giants said:
Stop crying. Lol
Click to expand...

Your right.

You have me laughing so hard from your ignorance I'm crying. I'll try to stop.

Maybe you should stop saying things so ridiculous, that I laugh?
 
Lord of Planar said:
Your right.

You have me laughing so hard from your ignorance I'm crying. I'll try to stop.

Maybe you should stop saying things so ridiculous, that I laugh?
Click to expand...

I love ya buddy. Lol
 
Long, but devastating to the alarmist cause.

[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Welcome to the Shibbolithic[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest parody by Brad Keyes Shibbolithic /ʃɪbəlˈiθik/ n. : the current geological age, regarded as the first of the Anthropocene epoch and distinguished by the hegemony of unconvincing impostors in the scholarly and scientific academies Source: ‘Shibbolithic.’ Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 1 Apr. 2020. _______________________ Bad Actors Bad actors: they exist, they’re real, and what’s…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Climate Change – Ebb and Flow of the Tide –Part 2 of 3[/h][FONT=&quot][apologies to readers for the delay between Part 1 and Part 2 has been too long. Because of this I am repeating the introduction. ~cr] Continued from Part 1 Emotional, agenda-driven politics confronts sound, evidence-based science Dr Kelvin Kemm The topic of global warming and climate change is far more scientifically complex than the public…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
The Climate Ministry of Truth in action:

[h=1]Climate Denial: the Facts (in German)[/h]Posted on 19 Apr 20 by GEOFF CHAMBERS • 11 Comments
It’s time, I thought, to write the definitive text on Climate Scepticism. So I started my research by googling “climate scepticism,” and my first hit was the Wikipaedia article on “Climate Change Denial.” (There is no Wiki article on climate scepticism.) And the only Wiki article we have about us is prefaced with this note: …
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Climate Change – Ebb and Flow of the Tide – Part 3 of 3[/h][FONT=&quot]Dr Kemm’s complete essay containing all three parts may be found here. By Kelvin Klemm The Pause Century 40. There has been essentially no global warming during the 21st Century. This reality has been called ‘The Pause’ by some, who claim that the real rise in temperature is actually going on, but that for some…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Pielke Jr: Systemic Misuse of Scenarios in Climate Research and Assessment[/h][FONT=&quot]Full PDF available here Roger Pielke University of Colorado Boulder Justin Ritchie University of British Columbia Date Written: April 21, 2020 Abstract Climate science research and assessments have misused scenarios for more than a decade. Symptoms of this misuse include the treatment of an unrealistic, extreme scenario as the world’s most likely future in the…
[/FONT]
 
[h=2]Are Droughts The Future Of Central Europe? German Data Show There’s Been No Trend[/h]By P Gosselin on 23. April 2020
Share this...


By Kirye
and Pierre Gosselin
The summer of 2017 in Europe was a wet one, yet everyone seems to have forgotten that.
Then came two hot and dry summers across Europe (2018 and 2019) and already climate alarmists began to call it the new normal.
Hot dry summers with intense drought were in store for the future, they claimed with a renewed level of alarmism. And if you don’t believe it, just look how this spring is starting off across Central Europe this year. Very little rain has fallen since the end of March. It’s climate change!
Aside from COVID-19, that’s what we are already hearing from the climate alarmists in Germany as they clamor for a little attention.
Data from 3 central Europe cities
Today we plot the monthly precipitation data from three North German cities: Hamburg, Hannover and Berlin, going back almost four decades.
The northern port city of Hamburg has seen a modestly declining trend since 1982:

Overall however, nothing unusual is happening. The city still gets plenty of rain. Last summer was dry, but such low periods have occurred also in the past.
Next we look at the monthly precipitation trend for Hannover: . . .
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Some Dilemmas of Climate Simulations[/h][FONT=&quot]Guest post by Wallace Manheimer A great deal of the recommendation that the world should modify its energy infrastructure to combat climate change, costing tens to hundreds of trillions of dollars, is based on computer simulations. While this author is not what is called a ‘climate scientist’, a great deal of science is interdenominational, and…
Continue reading →

A great deal of the recommendation that the world should modify its energy infrastructure to combat climate change, costing tens to hundreds of trillions of dollars, is based on computer simulations. While this author is not what is called a ‘climate scientist’, a great deal of science is interdenominational, and experience from one field often can fertilize another. That is the spirit in which this opinion is offered. The author has spent a good part of his more than 50-year scientific career developing and using computer simulations to model complex physical processes. Accordingly, based on this experience, he now gives his own brief explanation of his opinion, on what computer simulations can and cannot do, along with some examples. He sees 3 categories of difficulty in computer simulations, where the simulations go from mostly accurate to mostly speculative. He makes the case that the climate simulations are the most speculative. . . .
[/FONT]
 
[h=2]UAH Global Temperature Update for April 2020: +0.38 deg. C[/h]May 1st, 2020UPDATE: Changed emphasis from Northern Hemisphere extratropics to entire Northern Hemisphere (h/t John Christy)
In April, 2020, the Northern Hemisphere experienced its 2nd largest 2-month drop in temperature in the 497-month satellite record.
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for April, 2020 was +0.38 deg. C, down from the March, 2020 value of +0.48 deg. C.
The Northern Hemisphere temperature anomaly fell from +0.96 deg. C to 0.43 deg. C from February to April, a 0.53 deg. C drop which is the 2nd largest 2-month drop in the 497-month satellite record. The largest 2-month drop was -0.69 deg. C from December 1987 to February 1988.
 

The real climate science deniers

Manmade climate crisis promoters reject inconvenient evidence of natural climate change Paul Driessen Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that…
Continue reading →
 
Jack Hays said:

The real climate science deniers

Manmade climate crisis promoters reject inconvenient evidence of natural climate change Paul Driessen Fifty years ago, I helped organize Earth Day #1 programs on my college campus, calling attention to serious pollution problems that afflicted much of the USA. Over the ensuing decades, laws, regulations, and changed attitudes, practices and technologies reduced most of that…
Continue reading →
Click to expand...

Another bought and paid for denialist courtesy of fossil fuel companies and other right-wingers.
 
Buzz said:
Another bought and paid for denialist courtesy of fossil fuel companies and other right-wingers.
Click to expand...

From that link (#42):

". . . But what I find fascinating in all this is the steadfast, often nasty determination of scientists, politicians and interest groups promoting alarmist themes – and profiting immensely from them – to reject and deny any science, history and evidence that undermines their claim that nothing like this ever happened before. . . ."

[h=1]The real climate science deniers[/h]
 
Jack Hays said:
From that link (#42):

". . . But what I find fascinating in all this is the steadfast, often nasty determination of scientists, politicians and interest groups promoting alarmist themes – and profiting immensely from them – to reject and deny any science, history and evidence that undermines their claim that nothing like this ever happened before. . . ."

[h=1]The real climate science deniers[/h]
Click to expand...

You are responding to my point with a link to the same stupid article?

:lamo

And the part you are quoting criticizes alarmists for profiting when I just pointed out the author of said article is also profitting?

:lamo

Oh... the irony!!

:lamo
 
Buzz said:
You are responding to my point with a link to the same stupid article?

:lamo

And the part you are quoting criticizes alarmists for profiting when I just pointed out the author of said article is also profitting?

:lamo

Oh... the irony!!

:lamo
Click to expand...

You provide an unwitting example of the problem the author describes.
 
Jack Hays said:
You provide an unwitting example of the problem the author describes.
Click to expand...

Total BS.

Quote where it says that the problem is people like me pointing out that denialists are profiting off of their denialism.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom