• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The psychology of climate change denial

Tim the plumber said:
Mostly yes, but if it was true then the level of intelligence to do it as well does not fit with the abject lack of memory/honesty. I think I have encountered this very often. People become utterly stupid when they talk about their religion. Normally clever people.
Click to expand...

More opinion.



Which is also noted and dismissed
 
Tim the plumber said:
Do some sums, show somehow that you can do/understand something about science. What science is your strong suit? Mine is basic physics, for example.
Click to expand...

How nice for you. I get my science from the most reputable scientific agencies on the planet.


You ignore them. Lol
 
Tim the plumber said:
Mostly yes, but if it was true then the level of intelligence to do it as well does not fit with the abject lack of memory/honesty. I think I have encountered this very often. People become utterly stupid when they talk about their religion. Normally clever people.
Click to expand...

Like your religion which insists proven scientific fact is untrue? LOL
 
Threegoofs said:
Like your religion which insists proven scientific fact is untrue? LOL
Click to expand...

Which science fact is that?

Remember that it has been explained to you many many times that nobody, who is not mad, believes that the world has not got warmer.
 
Tim the plumber said:
Which science fact is that?

Remember that it has been explained to you many many times that nobody, who is not mad, believes that the world has not got warmer.
Click to expand...

Greenland is losing gigatons of ice per year, among other whoppers.
 
ocean515 said:
:lamo

"did Nied the strong and unanimous consensus of every single scientific organization on the entire planet...."

First, Maurice Strong created the Global Warming agenda.

He did that when he organized the first "climate" conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.

There, in the opening statement to the conference attendees he laid out the plan for economic control of the West, Agenda 21, and the realignment of power throughout the Earth.


Since then, when someone raises a hand to question the science has been conducted, or more critically, the prescribed mitigation, they are summarily attacked.

If you are a Climate Scientists, or affiliated organization, you can get on the gravy train, or, be cut off and starve, depending on what kind of results you bring to the table.

Climate Change has abandoned the Scientific Method. The whole agenda seeks to take control of the lives of all humans on Earth, demands the largest transfer of wealth in the history of mankind, and encourages punitive responses directed at anyone who gets in the way of it's objectives.

Given these facts, is it really that difficult to understand why people question what is going on?
Click to expand...

blah blah blah
 
ocean515 said:
Going on since the 19th Century? What does that mean? The first climate models came out in the 1960's? Which ones?

The issue of "Climate Change", as proven over and over, is about control and money.

That's it.

The science is just paid for frosting to use as a weapon against anyone who dares get in the way.

Maurice Strong, and the UN Agenda 21 mapped that out.
Click to expand...

blah blah blah
 
Jack Hays said:
As of 2015, Greenland retained 99.7% of the ice it had in 1900. Not a problem.
Click to expand...

Greenland ice melt has rapidly accelerated due to climate change which is a huge problem
 
Steve Case said:
I'd accept Climate Science:

If climate science wasn't pushed as an absolute in schools.
If the predictions from climate science seemed to be true.
If climate science didn't confuse accuracy and precision.
If climate scientists didn't rig the peer review process.
If climate scientists didn’t sabotage scientific careers.
If climate scientists didn't appear to cherry pick data.
If IPCC reports weren't re-written after final approval.
If climate scientists didn't try to sue the opposition.
If climate scientists didn't appear to fudge the data.
If climate scientists didn't resort to name-calling.
If climate scientists complied with FOI requests.
If climate scientists agreed to debate the issue.
If climate scientists didn’t exaggerate findings.
If climate scientists didn’t rig grant programs.


Canards BS & lies from climate science:

Warm sea water is melting Antarctica from below.
Thermal expansion affects world-wide sea level.
Methane is 86 times more powerful than CO2.
Water vapor rains out after a few days.
People depend on glaciers for water.
Burning biomass is carbon neutral.
Methane from Cattle is a problem.
Sea level rise is accelerating.
Polar bears are going extinct.
CFCs caused the Ozone Hole.
The deep ocean is warming.
Average world temperature.
97% of scientists agree.
Coral reefs are dying.
Drought is increasing.
Antarctica is melting.
Greenland is melting.
Ocean acidification.
Click to expand...

It is so easy to recognize the ostriches in the climate change debate. I chose the one I'd just read about. Many others are just as incorrectly stated. Maybe the poster meant noone in America depends on glaciers for water, but that probably gives them too much credit.

Nearly 2 billion people depend on Himalayan glaciers. What if they melt? - CSMonitor.com
 
[FONT=&quot][/FONT]
[h=1]Sad Trombone from #COP25 honcho: No one is paying attention to our lies and no one wants to pay more cash[/h][FONT=&quot]Statement by the Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change, Patricia Espinosa, on the Outcome of COP25 Several days have passed since the closing of the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in Madrid, and it is important to conduct an honest and realistic assessment of what happened so that appropriate measures can be taken by the international…
Continue reading →
[/FONT]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom