• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The butt whacker turns out to be a youth minister and scout leader

Rising Sun said:
Called it!



So, according to you, if women accuse a Democrat, they are telling the truth but if they accuse a Republican, then they are liars and schemers.
Click to expand...

Pretty much. Except the ones accusing Republicans are most likely getting paid.
 
Mashmont said:
This story couldn't be more ridiculous. The guy is clearly a great asset to the community. Helping kids, good father, good family man. To see him crucified for something as trivial as this shows how truly sick our society has become. And as I've said, these changing 'norms' are no accident. They are totally orchestrated to divide people, courtesy of the leftists opinion-shapers in the media on orders from the Marxist behind-the-scenes leadership.

A swat on her raincoat. omg. As I've said, had the situation been reversed, a young woman runner slapping a male reporter on the butt as she went by, everybody would be laughing. His only mistake was attempting to apologize.
Click to expand...

What other people do, doesn't excuse his behavior.
 
Rising Sun said:
I'm certain you see conspiracies all over the place with "these people".
Click to expand...

When I see the way stories are all presented in unison by the media even using the same wording, then yes I do see a conspiracy there.
 
Moot said:
What other people do, doesn't excuse his behavior.
Click to expand...

His judgment was poor, NOT because of the act itself, but because he should have understood the extremist PC culture we have today. But again, it was spontaneous, and he got caught up in the exuberance of the moment.

If I was the reporter's pappy, I'd have a talk with her. Tell her not to feed into this nonsense. My feeling is a Christian girl would have said "You know? This guy did got caught up in the excitement. He sounds like an otherwise pretty good guy. I accept his apology. I'm just going to forget it."
 
Mashmont said:
His judgment was poor, NOT because of the act itself, but because he should have understood the extremist PC culture we have today. But again, it was spontaneous, and he got caught up in the exuberance of the moment.

If I was the reporter's pappy, I'd have a talk with her. Tell her not to feed into this nonsense. My feeling is a Christian girl would have said "You know? This guy did got caught up in the excitement. He sounds like an otherwise pretty good guy. I accept his apology. I'm just going to forget it."
Click to expand...

His judgement was poor...so let him take personal responsibility for his own actions and stop blaming everyone else.

I could give a rats ass about your feelings. Good Christian men should keep their hands to themselves...period.
 
Moot said:
His judgement was poor...so let him take personal responsibility for his own actions and stop blaming everyone else.

I could give a rats ass about your feelings. Good Christian men should keep their hands to themselves...period.
Click to expand...

What is there to take responsibility for? He didn't do anything wrong.
 
Mashmont said:
His judgment was poor, NOT because of the act itself, but because he should have understood the extremist PC culture we have today. But again, it was spontaneous, and he got caught up in the exuberance of the moment.

If I was the reporter's pappy, I'd have a talk with her. Tell her not to feed into this nonsense. My feeling is a Christian girl would have said "You know? This guy did got caught up in the excitement. He sounds like an otherwise pretty good guy. I accept his apology. I'm just going to forget it."
Click to expand...

How exactly do you know the reporter isn't a Christian? Are you saying that Christian women must be okay with random strangers slapping them?
 
Mashmont said:
He didn't sexually assault her. He gave her a swat on the rear, through her hard plastic raincoat.
Click to expand...

Swatting someone on the rear without their permission is sexual assault.
 
Mashmont said:
He should have said "I was enjoying the jocular moment with the other runners who were gesturing. I gave the reporter a playful swat, all in good fun. That's it. I have nothing to apologize for." THAT is what he should have said.
Click to expand...

Interesting, two supposed Christians (you and the runner) thinking violating women's bodies is "good fun".
 
Mashmont said:
Here we go. Just like I said about Imus. Let's take away all the good he does, and hurt all the people he helps because of a silly trivial act.

I always say I'm glad God is my judge and not leftwingers.
Click to expand...

You think God is going to judge you highly when you think violating women's bodies is "good fun"?
 
Mashmont said:
Pretty much. Except the ones accusing Republicans are most likely getting paid.
Click to expand...

When Dennis Hastert, the former Republican Speaker of the House, was convicted of molesting little boys, were his accusers "most likely getting paid"? Do you think he should be walking free from jail?
 
Mashmont said:
His judgment was poor, NOT because of the act itself, but because he should have understood the extremist PC culture we have today. But again, it was spontaneous, and he got caught up in the exuberance of the moment.

If I was the reporter's pappy, I'd have a talk with her. Tell her not to feed into this nonsense. My feeling is a Christian girl would have said "You know? This guy did got caught up in the excitement. He sounds like an otherwise pretty good guy. I accept his apology. I'm just going to forget it."
Click to expand...

Interesting. Not touching people unless they consent to be touched is "extremist PC culture". That's an interesting take for Conservatives to adopt.
 
Questerr said:
What's insane is you, supposedly a Christian, thinking that its okay for men to violate the bodies of strangers against their will.
Click to expand...

He didn't violate her body. That's Marxist-speak. He gave her a little smack in a moment of jocularity.
 
Mashmont said:
He didn't violate her body. That's Marxist-speak. He gave her a little smack in a moment of jocularity.
Click to expand...


If he gave the slap to her face as opposed to her ass, would it have been as acceptable to you? Why is it okay to slap any part of a stranger without their consent?
 
Questerr said:
When Dennis Hastert, the former Republican Speaker of the House, was convicted of molesting little boys, were his accusers "most likely getting paid"? Do you think he should be walking free from jail?
Click to expand...

Hastert was a gay guy who was convicted of molested boys when he was a young man. That's a far cry from this guy's playful swat.
 
Questerr said:
If he gave the slap to her face as opposed to her ass, would it have been as acceptable to you? Why is it okay to slap any part of a stranger without their consent?
Click to expand...

No, the face is a lot different. That would have been a violent act that would have hurt. he swatted an area that didn't hurt.
 
Questerr said:
Rape is about power, not attractiveness.

Curious, how do you, supposedly a Christian, think God will judge you asking if a rape victim is related to a Yeti?
Click to expand...

God would be more upset if someone accused a man of rape without any evidence.

But as we know, Trump is interested in attractive women. Not someone who looks like Sasquatch's wife.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom