• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Assault Weapons Ban Is A Dumb Idea Pushed By Dumb People

PhysicalRemoval said:
Left Wing Logic
Was it a Muslim? If yes blame anyone who notices
Was it an Illegals? if yes blame anyone who notices
Was it a Criminal? If yes attack everyone who had noting to do with the crime


"Cruz", not White, has mostly Latino origins.
Click to expand...

"One drop," eh?
 
Hari Seldon said:
With the internet and social media? That ship has sailed and it ain't coming back.
Click to expand...

True, I am not sure how to work around that. I do think the creation of the 24/7 news cycle and hyper politicization of these attacks have had an impact in the rise in these shootings.
 
Sampson Simpson said:
The only thing that is dumb are stupid right wing posts like this. There is no reason someone needs and assault rifle. Not for hunting, and not for defense. It's a weapon of war, sole purpose is to kill the enemy. It's used to slaughter so many people. There is no reason it should be legal, and so easy to obtain, just because some rednecks have a hard on for big guns and they like going out murdering animals

It's the typical "pretend I"m making a legit argument" when its complete BS and a giant leap. LIke claiming handguns are worse and kill more. THat may be true, but its dishonest to claim that, people are getting slaughtered in absurd numbers that wouldn't be feasible with simply a hand gun.
Click to expand...
In your most learned opinion what's an assault rifle? Now mind you,not how it's employed but how does it function.
 
jet57 said:
If we get serious about another ban, we can stem the tide of this crap.
Click to expand...

SURE JET SURE, in cities where legally owned "assault weapons" were banned from future sale and current owners had to register them, the compliance rate is less than 20%. You want to turn millions of Americans into criminals for refusing to comply with stupid laws that are passed by spiteful people and written by gaping assholes in office. Good thinking
 
TurtleDude said:
SURE JET SURE, in cities where legally owned "assault weapons" were banned from future sale and current owners had to register them, the compliance rate is less than 20%. You want to turn millions of Americans into criminals for refusing to comply with stupid laws that are passed by spiteful people and written by gaping assholes in office. Good thinking
Click to expand...

Yes, yes he does. They all do.
 
JoeTrumps said:
Sean Davis is a well thought out conservative who always has good points to make. so I read this and think it has credence.


Assault Weapons Ban: A Dumb Idea Pushed By Dumb People




I'm not saying I have all the answers. I'm just saying I don't think an assault ban is the answer.
Click to expand...

There is no answer for control. Criminals will use the best deadly tool they have available. Laws will not stop the black market anyway. There are several cases where conceal carry citizens have thwarted the extent of damage crazy people can do. The best answer in my view is let more citizens carry. Then the criminals always have to worry about a Dudley Do Right shooting them!
 
Parrish said:
Then, why are these weapons the weapon of choice for mass murderers?
Click to expand...

Did the laws prevent any?

Do criminals follow the laws?

All you do is take freedom away from honest law abiding people.
 
Sampson Simpson said:
The only thing that is dumb are stupid right wing posts like this. There is no reason someone needs and assault rifle. Not for hunting, and not for defense. It's a weapon of war, sole purpose is to kill the enemy. It's used to slaughter so many people. There is no reason it should be legal, and so easy to obtain, just because some rednecks have a hard on for big guns and they like going out murdering animals

It's the typical "pretend I"m making a legit argument" when its complete BS and a giant leap. LIke claiming handguns are worse and kill more. THat may be true, but its dishonest to claim that, people are getting slaughtered in absurd numbers that wouldn't be feasible with simply a hand gun.
Click to expand...

The weapon of war argument is nothing more than a thin attempt at advocating gun bans while leaving the target so vague everything is covered. Most guns today are by that definition weapons of war, or derivitaves of weapons of war, even the kentucky rifle and land pattern musket used during the writing of the bill of rights were weapons of war.


Using weapons of war as a means to ban guns would mean 99.9% of guns would be banned even muskets, the term is simply a farce to try and garner support since the term assault weapon stopped scaring people into supporting giving up their rights.
 
TurtleDude said:
SURE JET SURE, in cities where legally owned "assault weapons" were banned from future sale and current owners had to register them, the compliance rate is less than 20%. You want to turn millions of Americans into criminals for refusing to comply with stupid laws that are passed by spiteful people and written by gaping assholes in office. Good thinking
Click to expand...
Maybe he will turn his in to show us all.
 
Praxas said:
So then the real question is, what is the Republican Senate, Republican house and Republican presidency doing about it?
Click to expand...

Sending thoughts, prayers, and inaction. Maybe this time they’ll grow a pair, but don’t count on it.
 
zsu2357 said:
Maybe he will turn his in to show us all.
Click to expand...

maybe he will show up at a police station with an armful he forcibly took from a bunch of gun owners
 
Nickyjo said:
Sending thoughts, prayers, and inaction. Maybe this time they’ll grow a pair, but don’t count on it.
Click to expand...

that's based on the tired and stupid idea the passing gun control will deter someone who wasn't deterred about the consequences of being convicted of multiple counts of capital murder
 
jamesrage said:
Not relevant to the fact that handguns are the most used is mass shootings.


That is a bold face lie. They mass produced and sold in the civilian market for at least 50 years.

https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2017/11/on-the-military-and-civilian-history-of-the-ar-15/545660/
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/.../06/gun-industry-nra-assault-weapon-timeline/


Still not relevant.

1.Mass shootings have been going on for decades. This isn't some recent phenomena as anti-2nd amendment ******s like to make it out as.

2.AR-15 rifles are not the only firearms deemed to be assault weapons by anti-2nd amendment trash. Going by the definition of the brady assault weapons ban any semiautomatic firearm that meets the following criteria-

This means that if you took any semiautomatic rifle with a detachable magazine and added bayonet lugs and a threaded barrel it would be classified as an assault weapon.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I don't do bold face lying. https://www.ammoland.com/2016/04/ar-15-rifle-historical-time-line/#axzz57E4MYQr8

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2016/04/ar-15-rifle-historical-time-line/#ixzz57EuqaJZD
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

1989

Jim Glazier and Karl Lewis of Lewis Machine and Tool Company (LMT), operating a new entity called Eagle Arms, begin producing complete AR-15 rifles for the consumer market. By this time, many of the earlier AR 15 Rifle related patents had expired, thereby opening up the market for complete AR-15 type rifles.
Click to expand...
 
jamesrage said:
Get rid of gun free zones. Because Gun free zone sign might as well be a huge ****ing sign that says "no one will stop you from shooting as many people as you want" or "your potential will be unable to defend themselves". Arm some of the teachers and school guards. Spread them though out the school.. But make sure its concealed carry and that none of the students know which teacher or guard has a gun. This is so that any suicidal social outcast losers can't plan on who they'll take out first or try to steal a weapon for. Nor can they plan on attacking the side of the school where there are no armed teachers or guards.
Click to expand...

What could possibly go wrong? And, of course, you forgot sending thoughts and prayers plus permitting guns on airline flights.
 
zsu2357 said:
Now that would be a sight to behold. Even better watching go down.;)
Click to expand...

In reality, we know he wouldn't. but if he did, we'd most likely first know about it by reading updates to the DARWIN AWARDS
 
JMR said:
Sorry, I don't do bold face lying. https://www.ammoland.com/2016/04/ar-15-rifle-historical-time-line/#axzz57E4MYQr8
Click to expand...

He is still correct though that ar-15's were sold prior to that, as the ar-15 has been available to the public since the 60's and the ar-10 with the ar-15 was based on has been available to the public since the 50's. What that article shows was patent expiration, meaning colt/armalite no longer held exclusive rights to 100% ar-15's, while prior they had to alter the gun to avoid infringement, or pay royalties, however the colt armalite variation was available for sale during the period prior to patent expiration.
 
zsu2357 said:
When the AR-15 began selling to the public.
Click to expand...

semi auto magazine fed centerfire rifles were sold to the US public BEFORE WWI. and our own government's Dept of Civilian Marksmanship distributed thousands upon thousands of MI carbines and MI Garand rifles to citizens after the Korean war. I own about 5 of each that I got from the DCM and its successor, the CMP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom