• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Swedish Wind Farm industry on verge of bankruptcy, experts warn

Yet the global wind capacity factor remains below 50%, in spite of all the added Wind capacity in the last decade.

Does not matter as already explained. You don't have wind here but have is 300 miles away in any direction or some slower wind in more than one direction? If you have strategically placed wind farms you can be covered.

Last decade? That's nothing! We are just getting started.
 
Does not matter as already explained. You don't have wind here but have is 300 miles away in any direction or some slower wind in more than one direction? If you have strategically placed wind farms you can be covered.

Last decade? That's nothing! We are just getting started.
Do you really think the wind always blows withing 300 miles of someplace? Plus, you get excessive loss at 300 miles, making the cost per unit even more money.
 
Does not matter as already explained. You don't have wind here but have is 300 miles away in any direction or some slower wind in more than one direction? If you have strategically placed wind farms you can be covered.

Last decade? That's nothing! We are just getting started.
You are avoiding the point, you cannot get to 100% coverage with an average capacity factor of ~42% without energy storage.
Also the storage to make up the difference will need to be massive.
 
Wind generated power is as corrupt and and ANTI-green as the EV car industry.

The amount of fossil fuel resources needed to mine for the materials alone far exceeds the realized benefits. Add in all the production and shipping costs, inefficient gains, and a significantly lower than projected operation timeframe and you are left with a bunch of hulking scraps of composite metal that then have to have giant holes dug for them by fossil fuel burning vehicles and have the abandoned blades and towers stuffed into the ground.

CO2 emissions is extremely low for wind power compared to fossil fuels.


While also a lot of progress in making it more sustainable.



This compared with fossil fuel that is still a very dirty business after over hundred years.


 
Does not matter as already explained. You don't have wind here but have is 300 miles away in any direction or some slower wind in more than one direction? If you have strategically placed wind farms you can be covered.

Last decade? That's nothing! We are just getting started.

Yes and wind power can be combined with other forms of renewable energy and different types of energy storage.





 
CO2 emissions is extremely low for wind power compared to fossil fuels.


While also a lot of progress in making it more sustainable.



This compared with fossil fuel that is still a very dirty business after over hundred years.


Even if it were wonderfully green...and its not...what percentage of power is wind actually providing?
Some of these numbers they give are daily or weekly best numbers. That is likely an average number. They are also in a region of the globe where that is more likely that most other places as their natural wind is greater than most other places. To move beyond what they are doing, they need to incorporate costly storage. They currently sell much of their excess to have a large minimum. Once the places they sell it to don't need it, their average prices will rise. When they start building storage, their prices will rise.

You guys don't seem to understand the future damage all this push for the agenda will do.

Nice picture of the ecological impact the required power uses. That land is better used for something else like food production or livestock.

View attachment 67500880
Remember when the 'environmentalists' would shit kittens over land use of ANY kind?
 
CO2 emissions is extremely low for wind power compared to fossil fuels.


While also a lot of progress in making it more sustainable.



This compared with fossil fuel that is still a very dirty business after over hundred years.


Even if it were wonderfully green...and its not...what percentage of power is wind actually providing?
 
Even if it were wonderfully green...and its not...what percentage of power is wind actually providing?

Wind and solar provided two thirds of power in Denmark.


While 18 percent in the whole of EU while total renewable energy is now 44 percent in Europe.

 
Wind and solar provided two thirds of power in Denmark.


While 18 percent in the whole of EU while total renewable energy is now 44 percent in Europe.

Wind soars to 18%..........

Im not anti green...Im just pro common sense. You cant make green energy without fossil fuel. Thats just a reality.
 
Back
Top Bottom