• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Swedish Wind Farm industry on verge of bankruptcy, experts warn

PoS

Minister of Love
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 24, 2014
Messages
33,953
Reaction score
26,645
Location
Oceania
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian

Christian Sandström and Christian Steinbeck analysed wind-power companies’ annual reports in Sweden and their work revealed “significant financial problems”, they told Swedish media outlet Kvartal on February 28.

“The total loss for the years 2017–2022 amounted to 13.5 billion Swedish krona [€1.2 billion], which meant a loss margin of 39 per cent,” they said about the sector.

Such heavy losses seem to be the rule rather than the exception for wind-power companies in Sweden, according to the annual reports.

The Swedish Government has been pushing its national energy policies in a “green” direction, promoting wind power and decommissioning nuclear power plants. But the cost appears to be much more painful than previously thought, the economists stressed.
But didnt the neo luddites tell us that green energy is the future? Oh well. Too bad. :LOL::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:;):p
 


But didnt the neo luddites tell us that green energy is the future? Oh well. Too bad. :LOL::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:;):p
In a land far, far away. The forced acceptance of foolish policy is turning the general public against all the BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS


But didnt the neo luddites tell us that green energy is the future? Oh well. Too bad. :LOL::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:;):p

OMG OMG OMG OMG BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN 1710964817616.png LEFISTIS LEFTISTS LEFTISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1710964767953.png
 
Last edited:


But didnt the neo luddites tell us that green energy is the future? Oh well. Too bad. :LOL::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:;):p
Their direct subsidies must have expired. I wonder if this will become another wind farm graveyard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
Yeah, wind energy is INCREDIBLY expensive to build and generate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
I fear that the current idea of wind power with the tall slender turbines, may not be robust enough to
live in the real world. The variables are simply too great for our level of material science.
 
During the 2022-2023 winter in Europe, you had both the war in Ukraine that led to drastic increase in natural gas prices as well as failing French nuclear power plants. Leading to high electricity prices in many European countries.

This led to Sweden becoming the biggest exporter of electricity, thanks much to the expansion of wind power. There this meant that some Swedish energy companies could make huge profit exporting electricity to the rest of Europe.


While the big problem for some wind power companies was that they signed contracts to provide electricity at a very low price. There they planned to buy cheap hydropower during periods of less wind power. While the price of hydropower electricity got much more expensive because of the opportunity to export the electricity to to the rest of Europe at a very high price.

While the cost of electricity in Europe is now decreasing thanks to the expansion of renewable energy as well as that the French nuclear power plants have had less problems this winter. That the expansion of wind power and other forms of renewable energy in both Sweden and other European countries.

 
During the 2022-2023 winter in Europe, you had both the war in Ukraine that led to drastic increase in natural gas prices as well as failing French nuclear power plants. Leading to high electricity prices in many European countries.

This led to Sweden becoming the biggest exporter of electricity, thanks much to the expansion of wind power. There this meant that some Swedish energy companies could make huge profit exporting electricity to the rest of Europe.


While the big problem for some wind power companies was that they signed contracts to provide electricity at a very low price. There they planned to buy cheap hydropower during periods of less wind power. While the price of hydropower electricity got much more expensive because of the opportunity to export the electricity to to the rest of Europe at a very high price.

While the cost of electricity in Europe is now decreasing thanks to the expansion of renewable energy as well as that the French nuclear power plants have had less problems this winter. That the expansion of wind power and other forms of renewable energy in both Sweden and other European countries.

LOL lying and deflection as usual



 
LOL lying and deflection as usual




The first sources is about the problem I mentioned. Markbygden signed contract to provide cheap electricity 24/7. That this lead to big problems then the cost of hydropower drastically increased because of the opportunity to instead export it to the rest of Europe.

Your other sources are about the rising cost of fossil fuels after the pandemic. As well as supply side issues and increasing cost after the pandemic that impacted the wind industry.

While the expansion of renewable energy help to reduce the cost of fossil fuel even after the start of Ukraine. There the rapid expansion of renewable energy continues and the temporarily problems are started to be sorted out.


 
The first sources is about the problem I mentioned. Markbygden signed contract to provide cheap electricity 24/7. That this lead to big problems then the cost of hydropower drastically increased because of the opportunity to instead export it to the rest of Europe.

Your other sources are about the rising cost of fossil fuels after the pandemic. As well as supply side issues and increasing cost after the pandemic that impacted the wind industry.

While the expansion of renewable energy help to reduce the cost of fossil fuel even after the start of Ukraine. There the rapid expansion of renewable energy continues and the temporarily problems are started to be sorted out.


LOL nationwide bankruptcy isnt a temprorary problem. The end of green energy is on the horizon. Get used to it. :ROFLMAO:
 
LOL nationwide bankruptcy isnt a temprorary problem. The end of green energy is on the horizon. Get used to it. :ROFLMAO:

The build out of wind power continues in Sweden and the other Nordic countries.




 
But didnt the neo luddites tell us that green energy is the future? Oh well. Too bad. :LOL::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:;):p

LOL nationwide bankruptcy isnt a temprorary problem. The end of green energy is on the horizon. Get used to it. :ROFLMAO:



:ROFLMAO:

Green energy IS the future... So YOU get used to it




ss1.jpg
 
Not for long. this needs to be 24/7/365 without excessively increasing prices.

You can see it already is here. And working. Does not mean it will be 100% but it's growing and keeps growing at great speeds.
 
You can see it already is here. And working. Does not mean it will be 100% but it's growing and keeps growing at great speeds.
There is a very finite amount of the daily duty cycle that can be filled by Wind and Solar without large energy storage.
To allow this limited duty cycle to reach their full capacity will require massive seasonal energy storage.
Existing batteries are not up to the task and other storage mediums need to be evaluated.
 
The build out of wind power continues in Sweden and the other Nordic countries.




LMAO your silly propaganda links dont prove anything.


:ROFLMAO:

Green energy IS the future... So YOU get used to it




View attachment 67500517
LMAOI funny they had to omit oil and nuclear from that chart, so its obvious youre just bullshitting with that link. Thanks for the self own. :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:
 
There is a very finite amount of the daily duty cycle that can be filled by Wind and Solar without large energy storage.

What percentage of energy can be fulfilled without large energy storage? Back it up with some links please.

To allow this limited duty cycle to reach their full capacity will require massive seasonal energy storage.
Existing batteries are not up to the task and other storage mediums need to be evaluated.

Stanford professor disagrees.
 
LMAOI funny they had to omit oil and nuclear from that chart, so its obvious youre just bullshitting with that link. Thanks for the self own. :LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL::LOL:

What's funny is you don't understand charts
 
What percentage of energy can be fulfilled without large energy storage? Back it up with some links please.



Stanford professor disagrees.
Well the much talked about Hornsdale Power Reserve
Covers 10 minuets for grid stability, at a cost of 172 million A$.
If we extrapolate that out to the ~14 hours a day with limited solar power,
that would cover 1.19% of the demand.

The Stanford professor is fooling himself, 4 days of batteries would be the minimum necessary, but they really need several months of storage.
 
Well the much talked about Hornsdale Power Reserve
Covers 10 minuets for grid stability, at a cost of 172 million A$.
If we extrapolate that out to the ~14 hours a day with limited solar power,
that would cover 1.19% of the demand.

I asked what percentage of power demands can be covered by wind/solar without massive battery investments and I asked for a link to support your claim. You provided neither... Unless you are claiming 1.19% can be supplied by wind/solar without massive battery storage.

The Stanford professor is fooling himself, 4 days of batteries would be the minimum necessary, but they really need several months of storage.

I tend to trust Stanford professors way more than you.
 
I asked what percentage of power demands can be covered by wind/solar without massive battery investments and I asked for a link to support your claim. You provided neither... Unless you are claiming 1.19% can be supplied by wind/solar without massive battery storage.



I tend to trust Stanford professors way more than you.
Sorry I misread the question, Wind and Solar combined can usually cover about 40% of the daily duty cycle.
The 1.19% is the amount of the duty cycle the Hornsdale battery can cover.
To fill in the deficiencies in duty cycle, you would need about 50 times more battery capacity, and even that would not cover all shortfalls.

The Stanford professor is excluding technologies due to bias, why should we intentionally limit ourselves?
 
I asked what percentage of power demands can be covered by wind/solar without massive battery investments and I asked for a link to support your claim. You provided neither... Unless you are claiming 1.19% can be supplied by wind/solar without massive battery storage.



I tend to trust Stanford professors way more than you.
Then maybe you should ask them to fill in the missing inconvenient truths.
 
Back
Top Bottom