Stop the Slaughter of Our Children With These Weapons of War

[RF667799]

Wrong again stick:



From Military to Mainstream: The Evolution of the AR-15 | HowStuffWorks




Christopher Bartocci's Combat-Reliable AR-15 Build -The Firearm Blog




Cormat AR Combat Rifle




Top 20 Next-Gen Combat Rifles




The Complete History of the AR-15 Rifle | Small Wars Journal



So, do I really have to go on proving to you that you don't know what you're talking about stick? I could, but the quote time monitor will block me out...


READ, LEARN, THINK, speak.

Why are you calling Clax1911 "stick"?

 

[RF667799]

Right, so other than that, when a guy modifies his AR15, he has in effect - an M16 doesn't he stick. The AR15 IS as an assault weapon: that's what it was made for and then rejected for the M16.

And if you would modify your M1 carbine, you would in effect have an M2 carbine.

What is your point anyway? The old "weapon of war" bleating nonsense?

 

[Samwise]

Your side lost the civil war - remember? And the Supreme Court said you're wrong; ask Turtledude about that one...

So you can't even say which of congress's enumerated powers would allow them to ban the arms you're talking about?

 

[jet57]

And if you would modify your M1 carbine, you would in effect have an M2 carbine.

What is your point anyway? The old "weapon of war" bleating nonsense?

The uh M2 was made later...

Yeah, you're just going to have to go through every one of those proofs and show exactly where they are wrong and you're going to have to use credible source material to do it.

ga'head

 

[jet57]

So you can't even say which of congress's enumerated powers would allow them to ban the arms you're talking about?

Yeeeeaaaahhh, noooo. You're going to have to study up on the history of gun regulations in this country: they date to the time of our founding. AND you're going to have to buff up the Heller decision as well. I'm not going to do all that for you.

So you can stop with the old dodge.

 

[Samwise]

Yeeeeaaaahhh, noooo. You're going to have to study up on the history of gun regulations in this country: they date to the time of our founding. AND you're going to have to buff up the Heller decision as well. I'm not going to do all that for you.

So you can stop with the old dodge.

So you're advocating something that is unconstitutional. Got it. Just so we know.

 

[CLAX1911]

Wrong again stick:



From Military to Mainstream: The Evolution of the AR-15 | HowStuffWorks




Christopher Bartocci's Combat-Reliable AR-15 Build -The Firearm Blog




Cormat AR Combat Rifle




Top 20 Next-Gen Combat Rifles




The Complete History of the AR-15 Rifle | Small Wars Journal



So, do I really have to go on proving to you that you don't know what you're talking about stick? I could, but the quote time monitor will block me out...


READ, LEARN, THINK, speak.

What is stick?

Feel free to go on proving whatever it is you think you're proving. You aren't proving your original claim better than AR-15 is in advanced military weapon. Nor that it's similar and capability to the M16.

 

[jet57]

So you're advocating something that is unconstitutional. Got it. Just so we know.

Now you've proven that you really don;t know what the hell you're talking about.

Thanks; I couldn't have done a better job myself.

 

[Samwise]

Now you've proven that you really don;t know what the hell you're talking about.

Thanks; I couldn't have done a better job myself.

If you'd like to try to cite the language that permits congress to enact legislation banning certain firearms, feel free to do so.

 

[RF667799]

The uh M2 was made later...

Yeah, you're just going to have to go through every one of those proofs and show exactly where they are wrong and you're going to have to use credible source material to do it.

ga'head

If you modify your M1 carbine you would in effect have an M2 carbine.

What is your point? You didn't answer that. Is it that an AR15 is a "weapon of war"? So what? I'm glad I have a Core-15 then. Certainly wouldn't want any of those evil AR-15s. :lol:

 

[CLAX1911]

The uh M2 was made later...

Yeah, you're just going to have to go through every one of those proofs and show exactly where they are wrong and you're going to have to use credible source material to do it.

ga'head

So what. The AR-15 isn't fully automatic so it's not like m16.

None of what you posted here as proof shows that the AR-15 is fully automatic.

The difference is the rate of fire.

 

[jet57]

If you'd like to try to cite the language that permits congress to enact legislation banning certain firearms, feel free to do so.

Ya' can't hack challenges can you.

Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, con- cealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

See how easy it is to prove you absolutely wrong?

You don't know what you're talking about dude. Get about 10,000 more posts under your belt. Learn who you're dealing with and then get back to me.

 

[jimbo]

The Second Amendment was made to safeguard citizen's right to keep and bear arms meant for war. Not for sport.

If our founding fathers meant it otherwise, they could have made the preamble:

"A well-fed population able to hunt game for food and sport, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The second amendment was meant to safeguard the peoples right to keep and bear arms. No reason or explanation needed.

 

[jet57]

So what. The AR-15 isn't fully automatic so it's not like m16.

None of what you posted here as proof shows that the AR-15 is fully automatic.

The difference is the rate of fire.

Oh please. Check your eyes dude. You've been proven wrong once again and I'm not going to chase you around the Maypole.

 

[Samwise]

Ya' can't hack challenges can you.



https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

See how easy it is to prove you absolutely wrong?

You don't know what you're talking about dude. Get about 10,000 more posts under your belt. Learn who you're dealing with and then get back to me.

Not sure how many beers you've had tonight, but I didn't actually ask you about the 2nd amendment. I asked you which of congress's enumerated legislative powers would allow banning the guns you're talking about?

 

[jet57]

Not sure how many beers you've had tonight, but I didn't actually ask you about the 2nd amendment. I asked you which of congress's enumerated legislative powers would allow banning the guns you're talking about?

Yeah, you're still not getting it are you?

That old dodge has been tried here a hundred times or more and I'm not going to watch you chase your tail.

LOOK at the proof I supplied you with. THINK about THAT and then ask yourself "Gee, self? Where an I wrong here?"

 

[RF667799]

Ya' can't hack challenges can you.



https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

See how easy it is to prove you absolutely wrong?

You don't know what you're talking about dude. Get about 10,000 more posts under your belt. Learn who you're dealing with and then get back to me.

Yes, you're certainly a legend here.

 

[Samwise]

Yeah, you're still not getting it are you?

That old dodge has been tried here a hundred times or more and I'm not going to watch you chase your tail.

LOOK at the proof I supplied you with. THINK about THAT and then ask yourself "Gee, self? Where an I wrong here?"

So you can't tell us which of congress's enumerated legislative powers would allow the bans you support?

 

[Rich2018]

Yeah, you're still not getting it are you?

That old dodge has been tried here a hundred times or more and I'm not going to watch you chase your tail.

LOOK at the proof I supplied you with. THINK about THAT and then ask yourself "Gee, self? Where an I wrong here?"

Just ignore him

I actually got him to admit to claiming he knows more about the Constitution than a former and fair famous Supreme Court Justice did.

 

[jet57]

Yes, you're certainly a legend here.

Can't beat my argument again can you.

 

[jet57]

So you can't tell us which of congress's enumerated legislative powers would allow the bans you support?

Yeah, I'm just going to let you run around chasing your tail dude. I've no time for you.

 

[jet57]

Just ignore him

I actually got him to admit to claiming he knows more about the Constitution than a former and fair famous Supreme Court Justice did.

Good goin. Guys like that are moving the right into the painted square behind the chains where they belong.

 

[Samwise]

Yeah, I'm just going to let you run around chasing your tail dude. I've no time for you.

Thank you for allowing me to win.

This board will be around for a while, I'm sure. This will be an interesting historical record.

I'm glad you were unable to cite any language that would permit banning of weapons. Posterity will see. Peace.

 

[Samwise]

Just ignore him

I actually got him to admit to claiming he knows more about the Constitution than a former and fair famous Supreme Court Justice did.

First of all, you're lying. I never claimed I knew more than anyone else. I said that neither you nor the judge you referenced could cite the actual language (you know, article, section, clause) that forbids any state from leaving the treaty.

And you still haven't.

 

[jet57]

Thank you for allowing me to win.

This board will be around for a while, I'm sure. This will be an interesting historical record.

I'm glad you were unable to cite any language that would permit banning of weapons. Posterity will see. Peace.

What did you win exactly? Some sort of cookie for not knowing what the hell you're talking about? or for ignoring Supreme Court decisions that prove how wrong and siilly your thinking is?

Maybe you won two cookies...

Yeah this place will be around for awhile; so will I.