• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stop the Slaughter of Our Children With These Weapons of War

What did you win exactly? Some sort of cookie for not knowing what the hell you're talking about? or for ignoring Supreme Court decisions that prove how wrong and siilly your thinking is?

Maybe you won two cookies...

Yeah this place will be around for awhile; so will I.

You still have failed, as I was absolutely sure you would. Smells like victory.
 
He's like a pantomime villain repeating "oh no it isn't..." Ad infinitum.

I thought you gave up. Have you found the language you claim exists yet?
 
Yeah but it's fun to see just how long he'll go on.

I'll go on until you produce the language from the constitution. Which will pretty much be forever because you'll never actually be able to produce it. Because it doesn't exist.
 
"look everybody; he's still moving!"

I find it interesting how you avoid a direct and forthright question. I'm sure our readers will find it very telling. One of us wants to discuss issues and the other takes weird pot-shots. And I love how this is all being recorded for posterity.
 
I find it interesting how you avoid a direct and forthright question. I'm sure our readers will find it very telling. One of us wants to discuss issues and the other takes weird pot-shots. And I love how this is all being recorded for posterity.

You've been proven wrong already. Do I have to go back and list the posts that prove how wrong you are all over again, or do you think that readers will do that for themselves? I mean if they just read along they'll see it for themselves.
 
You've been proven wrong already. Do I have to go back and list the posts that prove how wrong you are all over again, or do you think that readers will do that for themselves? I mean if they just read along they'll see it for themselves.

All you need to do is cite the language you claim exists. It shouldn't be all that hard, even for you.
 
Oh please. Check your eyes dude. You've been proven wrong once again and I'm not going to chase you around the Maypole.

You didn't show that an AR-15 is advanced military weaponry and it didn't meet your criteria either. You can attack me all you want, that won't be proof of anything.
 
You didn't show that an AR-15 is advanced military weaponry and it didn't meet your criteria either. You can attack me all you want, that won't be proof of anything.

I've noticed that the statists tend to attack rather than actually offer justification for their sociothopy.
 
All you need to do is cite the language you claim exists. It shouldn't be all that hard, even for you.

Well, ya'know, what you should do is just march right downtown with a copy of the constitution in your hands, bust right into a superior court and throw it at the judge and tell HIM to name the language in it and if it's not there then it's unconstitutional. Then go to an applet court, then march all 5 foot 3 of your frame to the Supreme Court and throw the constitution at THEM and tell them to find it and then how gun control is unconstitutional!!

You'll save the world for gun owners.
 
You didn't show that an AR-15 is advanced military weaponry and it didn't meet your criteria either. You can attack me all you want, that won't be proof of anything.

You give yourself away.

Nope, you're proved wrong again stick.
 
Well, ya'know, what you should do is just march right downtown with a copy of the constitution in your hands, bust right into a superior court and throw it at the judge and tell HIM to name the language in it and if it's not there then it's unconstitutional. Then go to an applet court, then march all 5 foot 3 of your frame to the Supreme Court and throw the constitution at THEM and tell them to find it and then how gun control is unconstitutional!!

You'll save the world for gun owners.

You still can't find the language? And now you're all blustery and what not? That's kind of bold for a loozer.
 
You still can't find the language? And now you're all blustery and what not? That's kind of bold for a loozer.

So, you're 5ft 3 inches tall?
 
So, you're 5ft 3 inches tall?

Nope. And the constitution STILL doesn't contain any language that would permit banning firearms.
 
Nope. And the constitution STILL doesn't contain any language that would permit banning firearms.

Nope? well than wear stilts when you do it, they'll take you more seriously.
 
Nope? well than wear stilts when you do it, they'll take you more seriously.

You see, people. This is when someone has literally no leg to stand on so they personally attack their discussion partner.

We know, Jet, that you have no stilt, erm, sorry, leg to stand on. That's why you attack me personally instead of actually engaging like a grown up.
 
I've noticed that the statists tend to attack rather than actually offer justification for their sociothopy.

People don't like having to restructure their beliefs. As someone who has done it before. It is very difficult and painful. So I can get the defensiveness, oftentimes I don't pay attention to it.
 
People don't like having to restructure their beliefs. As someone who has done it before. It is very difficult and painful. So I can get the defensiveness, oftentimes I don't pay attention to it.

You are a better person than I am. I hate their sociopathy.
 
You give yourself away.

Nope, you're proved wrong again stick.

If you know I'm wrong then there is no point in talking to me any further.

If you want me to bow before you entitle you champion of the debate, because you proved whatever the hell you think you proved, I'm sorry you failed to convince me.

you can think I'm pigheaded and at which point should probably stop talking to me because it's going to get you nowhere and it's not going to convince me.

But you continue to talk to me, and it's because of that I wonder if it's me you're trying to convince or you.
 
You are a better person than I am. I hate their sociopathy.

Well I don't think it's sociopathy, I've been in arguments with a bunch of different people on a bunch of different topics. I think what it is, is trying to drown out those that cause doubt.

I think that they become rude and belligerent to the point where some instances that they're just screeching because your words plant the seeds of doubt.

It's why when you see these big protests and stuff big chant and blow whistles. They don't want to be polluted with the thought that they might be wrong.

These are the people that require the most patience because they know they are probably wrong. You don't put that kind of guard up if you are sure.

The truth is the mother of all hatred. The more I live the more true that statement is.
 
Back
Top Bottom