• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Stauffenberg was correct in trying to stop Hitler.

Does Vincent start suggesting that when they're having breakfast at the diner? I don't remember

He starts talking about how "bacon tastes good... pork chops taste good"...
 
Klaus von Stauffenberg.

The guy and his Team were morally correct in trying to stop Adolf Hitler, as he tried to end the fiasco and suffering caused by the Nazi regime.

Stauffenberg was a German army officer and was a key figure in the 20 July 1944 assassination plot, known as Operation Valkyrie, which aimed to kill Hitler and overthrow the Nazi government. The plot failed when Hitler survived the bomb, leading to the execution of Stauffenberg and many others involved.

Stauffenberg’s actions were totally justified because Hitler was not just a maniac but his leadership led to the deaths of millions during the Holocaust and World War II. Stauffenberg and the conspirators believed removing Hitler was necessary to prevent further bloodshed. While violent resistance is often debated, Stauffenberg’s attempt to stop a genocidal regime can be seen as morally defensible.

are there any doubts that he was justified?
 
Stauffenberg was motivated by a desire to stop more German, military and civilian, deaths by means of an armistice with the UK and US . but not Russia. There is no evidence that he cared about Jews and other holocaust victims. I would be a bit careful about using words like morality. Pity Hitler survived; what would have happened if he had died will be forever unknown.

plus (and I don´t want to minimize his sacrifice) he was no democrat, he was a monarchist. He wanted Hitler be gone and restore a bit of feudalism.
 
Back
Top Bottom