• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

SPLC Tracks Declining White Percentage

Yielding the conclusion that there would be less hate if the percentages didn't decrease? I still don't understand the point.
It helps explain the recent rise in white nationalist populism and hate groups associated with that ideology, yes. I don't understand what you think is wrong with tracking demographics. What is your point?
 
That image doesn't support your claims. You are more than reaching.

Let me guess. That rando guy on reddit is your account and you just linked to yourself anonymously?

What's my claim? I asked why the SPLC was tracking this.
 
It helps explain the recent rise in white nationalist populism and hate groups associated with that ideology, yes. I don't understand what you think is wrong with tracking demographics. What is your point?

I don't think it's wrong. I track these trends all the time. It's interesting. At the same time, I don't have it posted on my wall. Why is the SPLC so concerned about it? And what conclusion would they draw?
 
What's my claim? I asked why the SPLC was tracking this.

Your claim is that the SPLC wrote that. And then are pushing a racial victim-card for yourself and your evidence is some rando guy's post on reddit. Which is probably just yourself linking to your own reddit thing you made up.
 
I don't think it's wrong. I track these trends all the time. It's interesting. At the same time, I don't have it posted on my wall. Why is the SPLC so concerned about it? And what conclusion would they draw?
Maybe he was working on a particular report where those numbers were relevant. Who cares? Changing racial demographics often motivate hate groups, particularly white nationalist populists. The SPLC tracks hate groups. So it makes sense information relevant to the work SPLC does would appear in SPLC offices. You don't work for an organization where that data is relevant, so it makes sense that such information would not be on your wall. I'm sorry, but I really don't see any issue here.
 
Are you suggesting I am defying God by opposing homosexuality and abortion?

Nope. To be fair, the bible supports racism, so I have to give you a pass on that one. But your god is pro abortion. And of course pro killing children.

Hosea 13:16 The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God.
They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.


But you are by supporting a major liar and adulterer. That's two strikes against the Ten Commandments. So in that respect, yeah. Although I'm sure you can find verses that can be interpreted to say that this is fine. Let's face it, the bible can be made to justify anything, just like the Quran. Exactly the way the Pastors and Mullahs like it.
 
Last edited:
Modern Christians do not support slavery in America. All Americans should realize that and let us move on.

A majority of Evangelical/Fundamental Christians support a blatant racist like Trump, so I would not be so sure. You yourself support Trump, don't you?
 
I wouldn't be considered an equal in China, or in any African country. And I'm okay with that. Those people have their homelands. Why can't I have my own?

"Yours" is founded on different principles and a different Constitution.

Plus, a ****load of other Americans DONT want what you want. We like and respect diversity and understand how diversity built this country and continues to benefit it.
 
"Always has been"

Percent+of+US+Population+Neither+White+Nor+Black.jpg

That doesnt reflect the millions of Italians, Irish, and Eastern Europeans that contributed their diversity to the US starting esp. in the late 1800s.

Are you saying you dont care about the different culture, just their color? Because all those immigrants brought their own cultures and traditions to merge with ours.
 
Tough luck...its not the early 1800's either and you weren't born into that America.

So, you can leave, hope you find your white paradise.

giphy.gif

He claimed in another thread that he'd prefer the US be a theocracy. Or at least be happy if it was.
 
I don't think it's wrong. I track these trends all the time. It's interesting. At the same time, I don't have it posted on my wall. Why is the SPLC so concerned about it? And what conclusion would they draw?

I asked you this days and pages ago:

Not sure why it's important?

Why did you find it compelling enough to post?
 
He claimed in another thread that he'd prefer the US be a theocracy. Or at least be happy if it was.

He deserves to live in some all white catholic hell hole full of angry compatriots who believe that masturbation is a sin....:lamo
 
ethnic-food-comic-1.png


And if you like experiencing diversity of cultures, then you have to maintain isolation. Having everyone live together leads to assimilation. We won't (and don't) have many unique cultures. We'll have one culture, and generally get the lowest moral values as a result.

Rubbish; what you're advocating is no less than Hitler's Aryan race purity nonsense. Why do you assume any one culture is more or less moral than any other? Isn't everyone supposed to be equal in the eyes of your 'god', or does that only apply to whitey?
 
We've had an immigration problem for decades, and if we want to develop an authentic culture we need to focus on the local. Globalism is the antithesis of culture.

If it wasn't for immigration your country wouldn't exist. And what the hell is an 'authentic culture'?
 
I'm sure Native Americans are so happy that you call them white.

Their blood is not white and neither is anyone else's. God made of one blood all nations of the earth and God has no issue with skin color. Too bad more people are not in agreement with God about that.
 
Nope. To be fair, the bible supports racism, so I have to give you a pass on that one. But your god is pro abortion. And of course pro killing children.

Hosea 13:16 The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God.
They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open.


But you are by supporting a major liar and adulterer. That's two strikes against the Ten Commandments. So in that respect, yeah. Although I'm sure you can find verses that can be interpreted to say that this is fine. Let's face it, the bible can be made to justify anything, just like the Quran. Exactly the way the Pastors and Mullahs like it.

God does not support abortion but He knows men will and will do wickedly just as He predicted they would in Hosea 13:16.
 
A majority of Evangelical/Fundamental Christians support a blatant racist like Trump, so I would not be so sure. You yourself support Trump, don't you?

Just because deluded democrat devotees claim Trump is a racist does not make it so. How they would cringe if they really knew how racist the Clintons and Obamas have been over the years, not to mention scores of others from both parties.
 
Just because deluded democrat devotees claim Trump is a racist does not make it so. How they would cringe if they really knew how racist the Clintons and Obamas have been over the years, not to mention scores of others from both parties.

Evangelical christians are democrats? Seriously? Demonstrate Clinton and Obama's racism please. I can't wait.
 
Evangelical christians are democrats? Seriously? Demonstrate Clinton and Obama's racism please. I can't wait.

I'm not sure you are allowed to view or can even comprehend to clear evidence of the dark sides of democrats, if you are a liberal.
 
Mark Potok, a senior fellow at the SPLC, has a note posted in his office tracking the non-Hispanic white percentage of the US population by year.

lsJhAKK.png


That's a little curious. Does anyone want to comment on this?

Your post is about as important as the one about population growth in the U.S. since 1960

chart_popl_graph_1.gifchart_popl_graph_1.gif
 
Does anyone want to comment on this?





I assume that Mr. Potok wants to remind himself that very soon the SPLC will soon have no more excuse for its existence, so all employees, including Mr. Potok, will have to find gainful employment.
 
I actually have no clue about the point of this thread other than groping for yet another lever to grasp to make another partisan political point (welcome to the current state of DP Forum). I simply have no idea why the fact of demographic change in the US is news to anybody nor why a certain somebody tracks it matters.

There are IMO, three major globally significant phenomenon that lie outside what we would have expected from the human social experience that have literally ruled the period from the 20th Century through today. Everything else that has happened through the period, continued Western Imperialism, angst over access to fossil fuels, technology, globalization were all fairly predictable. IMO, these globally significant phenomenon are as follows:
1) World War 1 which gave us World War 2

2) World War 2 which gave us Hitler's indescribably stupid opening of the Eastern Front thus repeating Napoleon's mistake. The Soviet Union had scale. That is all it ever had. It was never an actual threat to Hitler. A highly defensible position does not automatically yield an offensive platform of merit. Had Hitler dispensed with the Brits he could have had at the Soviets any time he wanted. In fact, using a route through South America and in possession of the English fleet he could have even taken us on directly had he chosen. While having suffered greatly throughout WW2, the Soviets emerged a world power far better positioned than it could ever have achieved otherwise. Losing some population through WW2 actually helped them just as dispensing with 20 million Chinese in WW2 and 20 million more after WW2 actually helped China in the long run. WW2 and the emergence of the Soviet Union on the world stage yielded the cold war, the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union, the emergence of a new system of government in Russia immediately overwhelmed by massive corruption and now a Russia that has virtually nothing, no economy, no nothing and a populace entirely bought in on the idea that Putin will be able to "steal" Russia back to the their post WW2 prominence. That is what makes it such interesting and fertile ground for a grifter. Enter Donald Trump.
The amount of haggling and hand wringing the West does trying to grapple with what the Soviet Union was and what Russia is consumes massive resources and time most of it misguided and misdirected because we refuse to deal with what Russia actually represents.

3) GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE which is easily the issue of pressing concern. Mainly it is of pressing concern because it has already been causing regional famine and dislocation around the globe and the resulting political angst. Yet we remain stubbornly insistent on sowing the seed of our own demise on this planet, utterly insistent on ignoring the human element of Global Climate Change. Some of our wealthiest people content to explore the stars looking for a new planet to send THEIR offspring to once this one is despoiled beyond all hope. Do you actually think YOUR offspring are getting on one of those starships?
 
I'm not sure you are allowed to view or can even comprehend to clear evidence of the dark sides of democrats, if you are a liberal.

Well, in that case you better show me your "clear evidence" so I can make a judgement for myself. Ok with you?
 
But them's the facts. Any "black" in you, and you might just have someone famous people attacking you for a decade, saying you're Unamerican, ...for nothing more than the color of your skin. And a good chunk of the country will join them. Hell, even when you show your birth certificate, that's not good enough. The price of being "black" in America.

From just over a year ago:

Some Republicans Still Think Obama Was Born in Kenya as Trump Resurrects Birther Conspiracy Theory
Survey results released by YouGov Friday show that 51 percent of Republicans said they think former President Barack Obama was born in Kenya,


But Trump's not using racism to energize his base. Nah.

The irony is that I am 39, and for as long as I can remember I have been told I am privileged and should feel guilty. Because of my skin color. I didn’t grow up in the South. I had no connection to historical racism. At all. And yet it’s still my fault black people l didn’t know lived no better than I did. Obama came and pissed all over that fire.

That is mine and millions of other white Christian males experience.

That is how Trump happened.

If you think continuing to try and shame us with all your labels will have any affect then you still haven’t learned from 2016. But we already knew that. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom