- Joined
- Jan 14, 2018
- Messages
- 18,956
- Reaction score
- 12,851
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Private
So, you are a eugenicist.
Consider the country listed as where this poster is from.
So, you are a eugenicist.
That's the other lovely thing about Socialists, eventually they get around to deciding who and what is a burden upon them and how it's all really for the best that only polite, obedient little blonde babies be bred.
Ditto. The only sources I can find are overtly Catholic. Having grown up in the UK I know this would have made mainstream news, however not even a tabloid source. So I doubt this story, if it even exists, is really as it's being presented.
The source quoted is pretty pathetic. In the right hand column you've got a very healthy looking actor pretending to be a priest just died of cancer. WTF? Who can take this seriously?
Assuming this is true, which I doubt, given I can't find any non-ridiculous source for it - this would be awful, and obviously against what most people are okay with, as this removes "choice", a keyword in "pro-choice".
Or it could be viewed as the "choice" being made from the origin of responsibility.
Apparently a British judge is ordering a Nigerian catholic woman to have an abortion because of alleged mental disability. Make no mistake, the baby murder lobby has no limits, and seeing how the United Kingdom has no written constitution and no civil liberties to speak of, this is not surprising
The United States should impose economic sanctions against the UK and cancel trade deals, if I were Trump this is what I would do
UK court orders forced abortion for disabled Catholic, Nigerian woman
Assuming this is true, which I doubt, given I can't find any non-ridiculous source for it - this would be awful, and obviously against what most people are okay with, as this removes "choice", a keyword in "pro-choice".
So you didn't read the article either.This has nothing to do with socialised medicine and a lot to do with courts acting in parentis as a guardian.
There's a setting in Tapatalk to disable the signature.Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk
Apparently a British judge is ordering a Nigerian catholic woman to have an abortion because of alleged mental disability. Make no mistake, the baby murder lobby has no limits, and seeing how the United Kingdom has no written constitution and no civil liberties to speak of, this is not surprising
The United States should impose economic sanctions against the UK and cancel trade deals, if I were Trump this is what I would do
UK court orders forced abortion for disabled Catholic, Nigerian woman
Actually I did.So you didn't read the article either.
There's a setting in Tapatalk to disable the signature.
The most obvious omission is that the person the abortion is "being forced upon" lacks the mental capacity to choose. It follows that to become pregnant she was raped. She's pregnant but is unaware of the implications of that. As the judge said , once she has a tangible baby, then she could be distressed as in someone takes away her favourite new doll. A minor "operation" will soon be forgotten
Is forcing a raped mentally handicapped woman to carry a rapist's baby to term a moral decision?
As stated above, she was probably raped since she apparently lacks the mental faculties to consent to sex. So, it's not really a "forced" abortion.
There's a big chance that the baby will also have some kind of disorder, which means we citizens will likely have to pay for it for the rest of our lives, or do you think that these mentally ill people are a contribution to our society?
She's a ward of the state due to mental disability. This isn't even about a woman's freedom to choose. She literally does not have the mental capacity to make any informed decision in the first place.
Are you an idiot? Do you not know what a ward of the state is.? Or why a court would be acting in loco parentis?No matter how abhorrent, some on the left will take the pro-abortion side regardless of the circumstances. And some of these people are Americans, and thus lack the excuse of having been brainwashed by their totalitarian governments.
Are you an idiot? Do you not know what a ward of the state is.? Or why a court would be acting in loco parentis?
There's a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in.
are you referring to the government as the "origin of responsibility"? because i don't know that i have ever seen someone with that opinion, and i was under the impression that you were more libertarian leaning?
either way, bodily autonomy is generally something that the person themselves make decisions for - although that wasn't really possible in this case due to the mental state of the woman.
My post has nothing at all to do with my leaning, simply recognition of who a large and growing number of people view as being the source of responsibility for their well being.
No matter how abhorrent, some on the left will take the pro-abortion side regardless of the circumstances. And some of these people are Americans, and thus lack the excuse of having been brainwashed by their totalitarian governments.
As I said, some on the left will defend abortion even in its most abhorrent forms.
Hopefully Britain can one day be liberated.
I just checked and it has actually been confirmed by several other sources, so it looks legit after all, but seeing it covered without the blatant Catholic narrative driving it definitely makes a bit less "offensive".
I don't know that I agree with the judges decision, and the woman's mother (presumably her legal guardian) is okay with caring for it - so I would likely lean in the direction of not forcing this, but it's also not my decision. This is a very complicated issue, and will only become even murkier once they confirm she was raped and find the culprit. I'd be interested to see if her mother had any knowledge about that.
I'd be way more upset about the woman's bodily autonomy being neglected here than the fact that there's an abortion involved.
She's a ward of the state due to mental deficiency and it's the doctors who want the abortion, not the court. Way to misrepresent a story.
So it is the socialized medical system doing this?
U.K. Court Says Mentally Disabled Woman Must Have Abortion - The New York TimesAssuming this is true, which I doubt, given I can't find any non-ridiculous source for it - this would be awful, and obviously against what most people are okay with, as this removes "choice", a keyword in "pro-choice".
You brought your soap box w/you.They are not "forcing" her to carry the baby to term. That was her choice and is a choice supported by her mother and social worker. They are not allowing that choice because, as good quality Socialists, they know what's best for everyone and will impose their will as they see fit!
This has nothing to do with socialized medicine
Exactly pro choice allows the woman or her legal guardian to make the decision.
That is one reason I am opposed to allowing the government to ban abortions.
Once you allow a government to ban abortions the government could turn around and force an abortion on a woman.
We saw that in China and now we are seeing it in the United Kingdom.