So did Biden did it?

[MauiMan]

I am still confused did the vice president “Joe Biden” held aid and got his son off? He was on a hot microphone well, I’m not going to give you the money unless you fired the prosecutor. Well, sob they was fired! Or was that his decoy on tape? I would like to know because the big scandal is out of in the public so stop playing like there’s nothing! You can cover it camouflage the Ukraine situation as this president did something wrong by asking information, but wait a minute, wasn’t Ukraine is working on an investigation into Biden also? Which is bogus you just want a walk to the finish line because you people miss the power. Honestly, I would like to get to the bottom of this. You cognize what is hilarious and I really desire to question the crap out of the democratic nominee because she holds a lazy eye toward her own party. She published an article “End of the Washington corruption” but, when it’s a fellow democrat she obviously developed a lazy eye on a corruption typical democrat, But, if it has Trump then she has 20/20 vision. If you people think that impeaching the president to continue this under wraps then we are not a country anymore. We are protecting the actual question that we had in the white house for eight years and in fact I could care less about the imagery of the 44th presidency legacy Because the 44th president chose this grease ball for his vice president. I would honestly like to know.

Yes, Biden did it.

 

[Parrish]

the transcript is a document, and he doesn't feel the need at this point, because Dems don't HAVE anything but hearsay.


there is your answer.

That is not a rational defense from his legal team if they claim "hearsay."

 

[SLC]

So why doesn't POTUS release documents and allow testimony from those who might exculpate him?

And why doesn’t Schiff allow witnesses that might exonerate him?

 

[SLC]

Then let the proper US gov't agencies get involved. If all that is true.

Don't get a private citizen, working exclusively for CANDIDATE tRUMP, be the lead to dig up dirt via extortion.

That is not a gov't function. That is a function of using a political position for political gain. Of the highest office in the country no less.

The POTUS has the right to conduct foreign policy using private citizens if he so chooses it’s not the first time it’s been done.

 

[SLC]

That is not a rational defense from his legal team if they claim "hearsay."

Its working just fine so far. Yesterday was a disaster for the Dems.

 

[CaughtInThe]

I have to give republicans credit for 1 or 2 things. Them looking the other way while Donald Trump extorts other countries to dig up political dirt on his political rival, thus helping himself personally, could get Trump elected again. It's sleazy and slimy but it might work.

Also attacking Biden is politically this way is also sleazy and slimy but also might work. These republicans have no honor or integrity and they aren't like their grandparents.

 

[j brown's body]

And why doesn’t Schiff allow witnesses that might exonerate him?

They refuse to honor subpoenas.

 

[j brown's body]

The POTUS has the right to conduct foreign policy using private citizens if he so chooses it’s not the first time it’s been done.

Right. Nixon did it. Good example

But not to pursue whacky right-wing conspiracy theories.

 

[Luckyone]

So why doesn't POTUS release documents and allow testimony from those who might exculpate him?

Simple answer: "NO".

Joe Biden is a man of integrity and honesty and I can tell you that the chances of him being guilty of anything like that is 1 in a thousand.

 

[SLC]

They refuse to honor subpoenas.

The Republican congressmen that want the witnesses did not defy any subpoenas.

 

[SLC]

Simple answer: "NO".

Joe Biden is a man of integrity and honesty and I can tell you that the chances of him being guilty of anything like that is 1 in a thousand.

Biden came to Washington a poor man and now he is rich on a government salary.

 

[americanwoman]

I am still confused did the vice president “Joe Biden” held aid and got his son off? He was on a hot microphone well, I’m not going to give you the money unless you fired the prosecutor. Well, sob they was fired! Or was that his decoy on tape? I would like to know because the big scandal is out of in the public so stop playing like there’s nothing! You can cover it camouflage the Ukraine situation as this president did something wrong by asking information, but wait a minute, wasn’t Ukraine is working on an investigation into Biden also? Which is bogus you just want a walk to the finish line because you people miss the power. Honestly, I would like to get to the bottom of this. You cognize what is hilarious and I really desire to question the crap out of the democratic nominee because she holds a lazy eye toward her own party. She published an article “End of the Washington corruption” but, when it’s a fellow democrat she obviously developed a lazy eye on a corruption typical democrat, But, if it has Trump then she has 20/20 vision. If you people think that impeaching the president to continue this under wraps then we are not a country anymore. We are protecting the actual question that we had in the white house for eight years and in fact I could care less about the imagery of the 44th presidency legacy Because the 44th president chose this grease ball for his vice president. I would honestly like to know.

"We are not a country"

There is no way you are American, so what exactly is your stake in "our" country? A paycheck, no doubt.

 

[tres borrachos]

I am still confused did the vice president “Joe Biden” held aid and got his son off? He was on a hot microphone well, I’m not going to give you the money unless you fired the prosecutor. Well, sob they was fired! Or was that his decoy on tape? I would like to know because the big scandal is out of in the public so stop playing like there’s nothing! You can cover it camouflage the Ukraine situation as this president did something wrong by asking information, but wait a minute, wasn’t Ukraine is working on an investigation into Biden also? Which is bogus you just want a walk to the finish line because you people miss the power. Honestly, I would like to get to the bottom of this. You cognize what is hilarious and I really desire to question the crap out of the democratic nominee because she holds a lazy eye toward her own party. She published an article “End of the Washington corruption” but, when it’s a fellow democrat she obviously developed a lazy eye on a corruption typical democrat, But, if it has Trump then she has 20/20 vision. If you people think that impeaching the president to continue this under wraps then we are not a country anymore. We are protecting the actual question that we had in the white house for eight years and in fact I could care less about the imagery of the 44th presidency legacy Because the 44th president chose this grease ball for his vice president. I would honestly like to know.

Got his "son off" from what?

 

[Luckyone]

Biden came to Washington a poor man and now he is rich on a government salary.

Trump was broke in 1998 and owing $1.17 billion dollars and with the help of the Russians he is now rich. What do you think he did for them so that they helped him get out of a financial abyss?

 

[SLC]

Got his "son off" from what?

Well actually he kept his son's gravy train of a "job" going by stopping the investigation of his son's corrupt oligarch boss. And that is EXACTLY why the Russian oligarch paid Hunter Biden ... for insurance. So Joe Biden helped continue corruption in Ukraine for the sake of his son's wallet.

 

[MrWonka]

I am still confused did the vice president “Joe Biden” held aid and got his son off?

No, Biden's son was never on. He was never in any danger in the first place. The prosecutor wasn't fired for investigating corruption he was fired for NOT investigating corruption.

He was on a hot microphone well, I’m not going to give you the money unless you fired the prosecutor. Well, sob they was fired!

Right, he was fired because he was NOT investigating corruption. You see America was about to give Ukraine a lot of money. We wanted to make sure that the money was used for what it was actually intended. We wanted to make sure a bunch of corrupt assholes didn't just have the money funneled to them. In order to insure the money went to what it was supposed to go towards we needed to make sure the Ukrainian prosecutors would investigate and do something about corruption. Biden wanted this guy fired because he was NOT doing his job. So by getting this guy fired and replaced by a new prosecutor if anything, he might have been putting his son into MORE danger. If the company Hunter Biden worked for was doing anything shady, the prosecutor would have been MORE likely to do something about it, not less.

but wait a minute, wasn’t Ukraine is working on an investigation into Biden also?

No, they were not. That's why they didn't have any information to give Trump.

Which is bogus you just want a walk to the finish line because you people miss the power. Honestly, I would like to get to the bottom of this.

The bottom was already gotten to. Biden did not in fact get the persecutor fired to protect his son. His son was never in danger in the first place, and if anything firing the prosecutor would have put his son into more danger not less. What Biden did he did in the best interest of the United States of America not in the best interest of his son.

 

[SLC]

Trump was broke in 1998 and owing $1.17 billion dollars and with the help of the Russians he is now rich. What do you think he did for them so that they helped him get out of a financial abyss?

Proof?

 

[SLC]

No, Biden's son was never on. He was never in any danger in the first place. The prosecutor wasn't fired for investigating corruption he was fired for NOT investigating corruption.


Right, he was fired because he was NOT investigating corruption. You see America was about to give Ukraine a lot of money. We wanted to make sure that the money was used for what it was actually intended. We wanted to make sure a bunch of corrupt assholes didn't just have the money funneled to them. In order to insure the money went to what it was supposed to go towards we needed to make sure the Ukrainian prosecutors would investigate and do something about corruption. Biden wanted this guy fired because he was NOT doing his job. So by getting this guy fired and replaced by a new prosecutor if anything, he might have been putting his son into MORE danger. If the company Hunter Biden worked for was doing anything shady, the prosecutor would have been MORE likely to do something about it, not less.


No, they were not. That's why they didn't have any information to give Trump.


The bottom was already gotten to. Biden did not in fact get the persecutor fired to protect his son. His son was never in danger in the first place, and if anything firing the prosecutor would have put his son into more danger not less. What Biden did he did in the best interest of the United States of America not in the best interest of his son.

The prosecutor was fired for investigating corruption ...of the wrong person. Hunter Biden's corrupt Russian oligarch boss. THAT is what got the prosecutor fired.

 

[SLC]

Right. Nixon did it. Good example

But not to pursue whacky right-wing conspiracy theories.

You see the Amecian people elected the POTUS and he has the right to pursue foreign policy as he see fit. Whether or not you personally think his policy is "wacky" is irrelevant. If the American people don't like his foreign policy he will be a one term POTUS. BTW Nixon was considered strong in foreign policy and it wasn't what got him in trouble.

 

[Simon W. Moon]

The prosecutor was fired for investigating corruption ...of the wrong person. Hunter Biden's corrupt Russian oligarch boss. THAT is what got the prosecutor fired.

Do you have a source for this assertion you can share?

I have only heard that Shokin was *NOT* investigating the owner of Burisma despite having a case open regarding the owner of Burisma.

Did you hear that Shokin was actively investigating the owner of Bruisma?
Or did you only hear that there was a case open against the owner of Burisma?

Also did you happen to notice the time period which were a part of that case?
I have heard that the actions which were the subject of tat case all happened before H. Biden came on board.
Do you have a source which says that these actions the owner of Burisma took happened while H. Biden was on board Burisma?

 

[Luckyone]

Biden came to Washington a poor man and now he is rich on a government salary.

By the way, if it is truth (not dirt) that you seek, it is very simple to go to Google and find out information.

Biden did not get rich while Vice President, which would happen if in effect he had sold himself to other countries. Biden is worth only $9 million (compared to Trump and his billions, it is a drop of water in a bucket) and that amount he has made "after" leaving office and mostly from making speeches.

Biden points out on the presidential campaign trail that he was often the poorest member of the U.S. Senate and, for at least a decade, has referred to himself as “Middle Class Joe.” But since leaving office he has enjoyed an explosion of wealth, making millions of dollars largely from book deals and speaking fees for as much as $200,000 per speech, public documents show.

If you are going to debase someone, at least be informed about what you are talking about. Panning someone without reason is evil.

 

[Airyaman]

The Republican congressmen that want the witnesses did not defy any subpoenas.

What will the witnesses be able to share in regards to Trump's phone call and the events surrounding it?

 

[Luckyone]

Proof?

Glad to supply it.

Trump turns to the Bayrock Group for cash. The company—founded by the Kazakh-born real-estate developer Tevfik Arif and headquartered in Trump Tower, New York — begins a partnership with The Trump Organization that goes on to develop properties in Florida, Arizona, and New York, including Trump SoHo.

As Trump spent the late 1990s and early 2000s struggling financially he turned to the Bayrock Group for much-needed funding. The company—which was run by Russian immigrants with ties to the Russian mafia and was headquartered in Trump Tower, New York — began a partnership with The Trump Organization, and helped develop properties in Florida, Arizona, and New York, including Trump SoHo.

Here are more links to more information":

Trump, Russia and a Shadowy Business Partnership
An insider describes the Bayrock Group, its links to the Trump family and its mysterious access to funds. It isn't pretty.

and more;

How Russian Money Helped Save Trump’s Business

Knowledge is power. Ignorance is a never ending abyss.

 

[MrWonka]

The prosecutor was fired for investigating corruption ...of the wrong person. Hunter Biden's corrupt Russian oligarch boss. THAT is what got the prosecutor fired.

Yet you have nothing even remotely close to evidence of such a thing. By your own admission Hunter Biden himself was not under investigation. The best you can claim is that is boss was.

So long as Joe Biden genuinely believed the prosecutor was doing a bad job, then he should have worked to get him fired. That was his job as Vice President.

 

[dairyair]

The POTUS has the right to conduct foreign policy using private citizens if he so chooses it’s not the first time it’s been done.

Extortion has been done before?
Perhaps, but then those that did extort, haven't been caught.