Sexual deviant's flag flown over State Capitol

[johnwk]

OK, so that's different than supporting the unionization of every workplace, but you know that.

Joe Biden detests right-to-work laws. He, like our sexual deviant crowd, does not want people being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.



:roll:


JWK




If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon the federal government for its subsistence, we can then bribe them for their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s productive population enslaved to pay the bills ____ Our Socialist Fifth Column open border democrat leaders’ long term strategy

 

[johnwk]

I explained why... you are free to dislike the reason.

You gave no reason. You gave an opinion.


JWK


The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a democrat leaders nightmare and not the American Dream

 

[CLAX1911]

Well, there you have it! How could I suspect that a majority of our sexual deviant crowd takes offense to being identified as such when they themselves celebrate their various sexual deviant behavior [LGBT], and assert they are proud of it?

People tell you. Just because I'm not offended by being called a deviant by somebody I view as devious doesn't mean others don't. Maybe they don't view you as devious.

As to the minority who are not proud of their behavior, and thus take offense to being accurately identified which upsets them, I can understand their dilemma, but the facts are what they are.

I reject your deviance as immoral. So a deviant such as yourself calling another person a deviant means the other person is not.

 

[CLAX1911]

Not by the terms of our federal Constitution, except with regard to voting which is protected by the Nineteenth Amendment.


:roll:


JWK



Civil rights ought not be based upon the personal desires of sexual deviants who now impinge upon the inalienable right of mankind being free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Yes by the terms in our federal Constitution. They must certainly can be citizens. The Constitution protects citizens. Sorry.

 

[CLAX1911]

You gave no reason. You gave an opinion.


JWK


The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a democrat leaders nightmare and not the American Dream

I have a reason.

 

[Bodi]

You gave no reason. You gave an opinion.


JWK


The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a democrat leaders nightmare and not the American Dream

The reason is a fact...

 

[maxparrish]

Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

It is somewhat offensive, if only because the governor's office is a state office that is being used to convey political messaging to a voting block. For a state that just went through the supporters of Evers broiler of investigating the slightest misuse of government office resources for political ends by the pubs, one has to marvel at the hypocrisy of flying a flag of personal political (and cultural) identity from a state owned flag-pole.

One supposes if this is "okay", so would be any flag of identity. Not only pro-life supporters, but gun owners, chamber of commerce flags, union flags, religious, and non-profit flags (as well as the bars and stars). In principle, I suppose Mexico's flag, Chinese flag, India's flag, NAMBLA, the Hammer and Sycle, the Knight's Templar, and a Swastika would be fine. No doubt we need to make room for a flags of "female pride", "black pride", "latino pride", and a "Muslim Pride" as well. Surely ISIS or the UN has a few spare flags they can send Evers?

On the other hand, as I believe, NOBODY's flag should be on a government flagpole other than the government of the U.S. and (in this case) the government of the State of Wisconsin. Period.

That Evers chose to use the state flagpole for his own political messaging to a voting block is disgusting.

 

[SDET]

Because this is gay pride month and you and other pro-lifers have not successfully lobbied your state to fly a pro-life flag. Also calling gay people "sexual deviants" pretty much shows your utter bigotry.

It reminds me of the old church ladies in my town growing up. They insisted in using the word Sodomite. Over the past 10 years or so, I have developed less angst about homosexuals for these reasons: American women are so repulsive, that it could explain some men being gay. Lesbians make some sense too: They spare men the torment of their toxic personalities. win-win.

From my perspective, American women make third world countries enjoyable by comparison.

 

[OrphanSlug]

Wrong. You haven't been paying attention. The sexual deviant crowd constantly sues those who attempt to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Why are you making stuff up? At least admit the sexual deviant crowd, in general, detests, with a passion, those who find their sexual proclivities objectionable, and dare to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.]

Your thinking is *exactly* the same argument used by racists to put up "no colored allowed" and "whites only" signs in front of stores and restaurants. That is all that happened from then to now, moving away from economically and socially isolating minorities to economically and socially isolating "sexual deviants" as you call them.

And BTW, that term you are using is intentionally derogatory and demeaning... just as yesterday it was the N word.

Pretend otherwise, come up with whatever clever argument you can muster, but everyone knows better.

What you are demonstrating is why we unfortunately need to protect people, to deal with those like you masquerading their prejudicial actions as "inalienable rights."

 

[TheParser]

The people you refer to are illegal entrants. And that is how I address them. I am offended when people use words to hide what is.

And that is your right.

It is not my place to tell you what words to use.

Of course, one must accept the consequences if one uses offensive terms in public.




Have a nice day!

 

[TheParser]

I can't understand how you come to that conclusion when these deviants celebrate their deviant behavior and take great "pride" in it.

Straight people are not ashamed of their sexuality.

So those parades are intended to reassure gay people and their families and friends that gay love is nothing to be ashamed of, either.



Have a nice day!

 

[johnwk]

That Evers chose to use the state flagpole for his own political messaging to a voting block is disgusting.

Exactly!


JWK


The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

 

[johnwk]

What you are demonstrating is why we unfortunately need to protect people, to deal with those like you masquerading their prejudicial actions as "inalienable rights."

Protect people like me? Your kneejerk reaction shows your personal prejudices. My thinking has to do with the rule of law, and the constitutional method to achieve your goal on a federal level is to adopt a constitutional amendment, such as the Equal Rights Amendment which was rejected by the American People, but would have, if adopted, granted by its second section a power to Congress “to enforce, by appropriate legislation” what the Equality Act attempts to do without this authorization in our Constitution.


:roll:

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

 

[johnwk]

Yes by the terms in our federal Constitution. They must certainly can be citizens. The Constitution protects citizens. Sorry.

No one on this end disputes citizenship of our sexual deviant crowd. What is disputed and accurately so is, our federal Constitution does not forbid distinctions being made based upon sex other than the Nineteenth Amendment which is restricted to voting.


:roll:

JWK


The Democrat Party Leadership has been angry, stupid and obnoxious ever since the Republican Party Leadership freed the democrat’s slaves. ___ Author unknown

 

[OrphanSlug]

Protect people like me? Your kneejerk reaction shows your personal prejudices. My thinking has to do with the rule of law, and the constitutional method to achieve your goal on a federal level is to adopt a constitutional amendment, such as the Equal Rights Amendment which was rejected by the American People, but would have, if adopted, granted by its second section a power to Congress “to enforce, by appropriate legislation” what the Equality Act attempts to do without this authorization in our Constitution.


:roll:

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

That is completely false, under your thinking everything I said above (that you conveniently and rather cowardly cut out) comes back to reality.

 

[johnwk]

I can't understand how you come to that conclusion when these deviants celebrate their deviant behavior and take great "pride" in it.

Straight people are not ashamed of their sexuality.

So those parades are intended to reassure gay people . . .

Exactly! But however well intended, those parades only add to the abnormality which is put on public display. The following example is typical:






JWK


The Federal Reserve System of 1913 and the Sixteenth Amendment, also of 1913, have provided the necessary tools to spread the evil tentacles of democratic capitalism into almost every corner of our once free market, free enterprise system.

 

[johnwk]

That is completely false, under your thinking everything I said above (that you conveniently and rather cowardly cut out) comes back to reality.

And the reality is, the Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.


:roll:

JWK

Democrat leaders claim to be advocates for hard working people. If that is so, why do they not promote an end to the unconstitutional “Temporary Victory Tax” of 1943, which began federal confiscation of the bread which working people have earned by the sweat of their labor?

 

[OrphanSlug]

And the reality is, the Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.


:roll:

JWK

Democrat leaders claim to be advocates for hard working people. If that is so, why do they not promote an end to the unconstitutional “Temporary Victory Tax” of 1943, which began federal confiscation of the bread which working people have earned by the sweat of their labor?

You can keep going with all this nonsense all you would like, but 50+ years ago there was the same opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 under the same argument.

Which was all a front, these arguments including yours are all about prejudices.

All you are arguing for is today's version of 1950's and 1960's thinking, asking for "No Gays Allowed" signs in storefronts since the aged "No Colored Allowed" signs back then are no more.

Pretend all you want that this is about something else, all you are doing is showing here and advocating for today's version of 1950's and 1960's thinking.

 

[blarg]

Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

well being unusual is nto the same as being bad

and the pro life crowed puts the well being of a fetus something with less thought and feeling in its mind (if its developed to the point of having one ) then some of are food livestock over the wishes of other people just like themselves that seems ****ed up

 

[johnwk]

You can keep going with all this nonsense all you would like, but 50+ years ago there was the same opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 under the same argument.

Which was all a front, these arguments including yours are all about prejudices.

All you are arguing for is today's version of 1950's and 1960's thinking, asking for "No Gays Allowed" signs in storefronts since the aged "No Colored Allowed" signs back then are no more.

Pretend all you want that this is about something else, all you are doing is showing here and advocating for today's version of 1950's and 1960's thinking.

Oh, give it a freaken break. My arguments have to do with abiding by our Constitution, and protecting the inalienable rights of all, including a sexual deviants' primary right to be free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.


JWK

In every communist dictatorial oppressive country, like Cuba, China, and Venezuela, the people are disarmed. Forewarned is forearmed.

 

[OrphanSlug]

Oh, give it a freaken break. My arguments have to do with abiding by our Constitution, and protecting the inalienable rights of all, including a sexual deviants' primary right to be free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.


JWK

In every communist dictatorial oppressive country, like Cuba, China, and Venezuela, the people are disarmed. Forewarned is forearmed.

No, they have to do with hiding behind a Constitutional argument to isolate "sexual deviants" in the same manner racists did 50+ years ago. You are not arguing for their freedom or yours, all you are doing is advocating for today's evolution of prejudices.

The very reason we needed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in the first place.

 

[calamity]

Why on earth is a flag representing sexual deviants being flown over a state capitol and pro-life banners not being flown on government property?

See: Evers orders gay pride flag to fly over Wisconsin Capitol

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Tony Evers has ordered a rainbow flag symbolizing gay pride to be flown over the Wisconsin state Capitol for the first time.

JWK

The Equality Act attempts to pass legislation authorized under the “Equal Rights Amendment” which was rejected by the American people, and thus, to this degree, is a usurpation of power not granted.

What's wrong with boys kissing boys?

 

[TheParser]

Exactly! But however well intended, those parades only add to the abnormality which is put on public display. The following example is typical:

I believe you to be very sincere.

So I think that you may want to reconsider the word "typical."

I agree with you that it would better (for many reasons) to have only adult parade participants.

Just as you and your supporters should refrain from using unkind language about gays, gays also have the responsibility not to do things that may outrage opponents.




Have a nice day!

 

[Phys251]

Wrong. You haven't been paying attention. The sexual deviant crowd constantly sues those who attempt to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.


Why are you making stuff up? At least admit the sexual deviant crowd, in general, detests, with a passion, those who find their sexual proclivities objectionable, and dare to exercise their inalienable right to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.



JWK


Without a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalism [our MSM], the crisis at our southern border would never have grown to what now amounts to an outright invasion and threatens the general welfare of the United states.

Having been completely demolished in your own thread, you are now trying to divert the discussion elsewhere.

 

[bearpoker]

Stop trying to co-opt the civil rights fight for Black Americans.


JWK


Socialist democrats running for office will promise food on the table, free public housing, health care for all, guaranteed income, free college tuition, and other niceties by taxing the so called rich; and if by chance they ever do gain political power because of such promises made, their socialist iron-fisted dependency will enslave the very fools who elected them.

Are you under the impression that large, bolded fonts add credibility to your arguments?