• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sex With More That One Person in Your Lifetime? More Likely to Get Cancer. God's Consequences

thats nice

lets begin

make women drafted into war

normalize women going into coal mines or tough jobs

make women pay the same alimony as men

I'm good with all that. In fact, there have been women who have tried to get into such jobs and not allowed.

make women expected to pay half of expenses in the relationship

cool?

That can already happen. I stand against it as a mandated thing though. The individuals within the relationship decide how things get divided up, not those external to the relationship. I know of relationships where the woman handles more of the expenses than the man does, counting only the M/F relationships.
 
I'm good with all that. In fact, there have been women who have tried to get into such jobs and not allowed.



That can already happen. I stand against it as a mandated thing though. The individuals within the relationship decide how things get divided up, not those external to the relationship. I know of relationships where the woman handles more of the expenses than the man does, counting only the M/F relationships.

im happy we can come to terms with this

the left is anti-man where as the right argues for the 1950's to come back when it is long dead

this is the modern centrist solution

good.
 
lol. functional and natural? are you on the right wing?

well actually no-I believe in egalitarianism instead of traditional conservatism like the right but im also pro man unlike the left
 
Powered exoskeletons could help work harder and do more than even John Henry.

That has nothing to do with equality. If owners of such things don't allow women to use them, or even allow women who own them to work for them because, well, women, then the machine didn't make a difference in equality. Equality is about looking at the person and ignoring things like sex, gender, age, number of limbs, whatever, and looking at whether or not the person can do what is needed, or is treated the same as someone who isn't like they are.
 
That has nothing to do with equality. If owners of such things don't allow women to use them, or even allow women who own them to work for them because, well, women, then the machine didn't make a difference in equality. Equality is about looking at the person and ignoring things like sex, gender, age, number of limbs, whatever, and looking at whether or not the person can do what is needed, or is treated the same as someone who isn't like they are.

The strength of the exoskeleton would be a known quantity easily maneuvered by any person.
 
So when did we deviate from sex and cancer to exoskeletons?
 
Let us get back on topic. There are two points here.
1. Prove that this god exists.

Then

2. Explain why he gives cancer who have only had sex in marriage and why does he inflict cancer on innocent children who know sod all about sex?
 
We understand evolution more, now and we subscribe to capitalism for the market based conveniences.

You appear to be groping toward making an off-topic point. What is it?
 
If women believed more in equality they may harass us for sex with their sexual superiority until we cannot handle it anymore and start us clamoring to get serious.

ill admit that women control the sex but most women arent feminists and want to be feminine(nurturing life)
 
Back
Top Bottom