Roy Moore campaign refuses to substantiate claims about accuser

[Oborosen]

You still can't handle reality, I see.

Actually I live in it, but calling out hypocrisy makes for a hilarious pass time.

 

[upsideguy]

Woah, woah, woah. let's not be so quick to judge Satan.

Wow! Though the article seems somewhat suspect (a vague reference to some type of poll or focus group), the support of Roy Moore and Donald Trump seem to be Exhibits A and B of that argument.

My evangelical brothers and sisters have lost their way.

 

[cpwill]

Wow! Though the article seems somewhat suspect (a vague reference to some type of poll or focus group), the support of Roy Moore and Donald Trump seem to be Exhibits A and B of that argument.

My evangelical brothers and sisters have lost their way.

Babylon Bee is a satire.

 

[upsideguy]

Babylon Bee is a satire.

Thank you. I admit that I have been had. I usually double check websites I had not previously been to, but failed to do so here. I took it seriously, but with a grain of salt in that its "research" did not seem to have any integrity and its conclusion substantially absurd. I should have known better. My excuse: multi-tasking in that I am watching a movie while posting, so I wasn't paying particularly good attention.

Unfortunately, in jest, they hit too close to the truth.

 

[cpwill]

Thank you. I admit that I have been had. I usually double check websites I had not previously been to, but failed to do so here. I took it seriously, but with a grain of salt in that its "research" did not seem to have any integrity and its conclusion substantially absurd. I should have known better. My excuse: multi-tasking in that I am watching a movie while posting, so I wasn't paying particularly good attention.

Unfortunately, in jest, they hit too close to the truth.

It's been a rough two years for the evangelical community. That split was painful, and more than a few were exposed.

 

[Tigerace117]

Actually I live in it, but calling out hypocrisy makes for a hilarious pass time.

Too bad you do nothing of the sort.

 

[Oborosen]

Too bad you do nothing of the sort.

Too bad you have yet to supply an evidence to the contrary of that. Though you are welcome to try.

 

[Tigerace117]

Too bad you have yet to supply an evidence to the contrary of that. Though you are welcome to try.

You haven't "called out hypocrisy".....you've down nothing but spew your own partisan interpretation, and declare anyone who doesn't agree is a "hypocrite".

 

[Oborosen]

You haven't "called out hypocrisy".....you've down nothing but spew your own partisan interpretation, and declare anyone who doesn't agree is a "hypocrite".

Wow, you actually got something right for once.
It is my interpretation, just like how you keep mewling on is your own interpretation of how you want it to work. Yet you keep forgetting how things have progressed this far and that is one of the many kinds of hypocrisy that we like to call it when you poke your head up.

It gives my dull night meaning.

 

[Tigerace117]

Wow, you actually got something right for once.
It is my interpretation, just like how you keep mewling on is your own interpretation of how you want it to work. Yet you keep forgetting how things have progressed this far and that is one of the many kinds of hypocrisy that we like to call it when you poke your head up.

It gives my dull night meaning.

Oh wow, all those words and yet you still have managed nothing except to demonstrate the fact that you have a very loose grasp on reality. Your delusions of grandeur are always amusing though buddy.

You don't call out hypocrisy. You shriek and shake your fist and constantly whine, and its only in the warped corners of your mind that "we"(by which, of course you are referring to you and your tapeworm---because there is no "we" ) are calling anyone out.

but I'm glad you being constantly embarrassed gives your dull night meaning.

 

[Taylor]

Looks like the woman with the yearbook just admitted to some forgery. Tsk tsk.

 

[tres borrachos]

Looks like the woman with the yearbook just admitted to some forgery. Tsk tsk.

Yes, she admitted to writing the name of the restaurant next to his signature. But she insists he wrote the note. He insists he never met her. I still believe her, but she should have said when she came out that she was the one who put the name of the restaurant next to his signature (and the date too, I believe). It looked like it was written by a different hand anyway.

 

[Herkamer63]

I was going to respond to 7 other notifications I got over this and the Trump bank account, but I thought I'd go to this instead and ignore the others altogether because of this story of Beverly Nelson and her forge Moore's inscription:

Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks: Roy Moore accuser forged yearbook inscription, is 'clearly a liar' - CNNPolitics

You can also find it on Fox News, Breitbart, Reddit, Rutgers, and a few other sites. Just came out today. ABC News originally reported she had this yearbook not too long ago claiming Nelson had an inscription written by Moore, and used it as evidence that Moore had a relationship with her. Now the accusers story is proven untrue, when she came out and admitted she forged it. Well, gee, I thought we were suppose to take these women's word for it. Imagine if we just wait and see how many of these stories are even true and which ones are made up. Perfect example, right here. Again, that still doesn't clear Moore because he still could have done something, but if we're just patient and see what else comes out, then we can make our determination.

 

[tres borrachos]

I was going to respond to 7 other notifications I got over this and the Trump bank account, but I thought I'd go to this instead and ignore the others altogether because of this story of Beverly Nelson and her forge Moore's inscription:

Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks: Roy Moore accuser forged yearbook inscription, is 'clearly a liar' - CNNPolitics

You can also find it on Fox News, Breitbart, Reddit, Rutgers, and a few other sites. Just came out today. ABC News originally reported she had this yearbook not too long ago claiming Nelson had an inscription written by Moore, and used it as evidence that Moore had a relationship with her. Now the accusers story is proven untrue, when she came out and admitted she forged it. Well, gee, I thought we were suppose to take these women's word for it. Imagine if we just wait and see how many of these stories are even true and which ones are made up. Perfect example, right here. Again, that still doesn't clear Moore because he still could have done something, but if we're just patient and see what else comes out, then we can make our determination.

You do realize she is still saying that he wrote the inscription and signed his name, and she wrote only the restaurant name next to it? The "inscription by Moore" isn't what she admitted to writing in there herself.

 

[Taylor]

Yes, she admitted to writing the name of the restaurant next to his signature. But she insists he wrote the note. He insists he never met her. I still believe her, but she should have said when she came out that she was the one who put the name of the restaurant next to his signature (and the date too, I believe). It looked like it was written by a different hand anyway.

I'll bet she wrote "DA" as well. Also, the last name in the signature looks completely different than the corresponding letters in the text. She should just submit it to an independent analyst. I'm guessing maybe they can tell if the ink came from the same pen?

 

[tres borrachos]

I'll bet she wrote "DA" as well. Also, the last name in the signature looks completely different than the corresponding letters in the text. She should just submit it to an independent analyst. I'm guessing maybe they can tell if the ink came from the same pen?

Okay, maybe she did, although all she's saying is she added the date and the restaurant name. She should have said that before when this came out. But even if she did add "DA", she's still saying he wrote the inscription, and he's denying he knew her.

 

[Herkamer63]

You do realize she is still saying that he wrote the inscription and signed his name, and she wrote only the restaurant name next to it? The "inscription by Moore" isn't what she admitted to writing in there herself.

She forged a false document. ABC News was coaching her during the interview to say what they wanted her to say, so these so called "notes" that they brought up and the rest of the handwriting that's supposedly Moore's could also turn out to be forged as well. Inserting dates and places when they were never in there to begin with, but presented it as if she put it in there originally is extremely suspicious. So this woman's story already seems to be falling apart, and if it happens to turn out totally false, we could see legal action as a result.

 

[tres borrachos]

She forged a false document. ABC News was coaching her during the interview to say what they wanted her to say, so these so called "notes" that they brought up and the rest of the handwriting that's supposedly Moore's could also turn out to be forged as well. Inserting dates and places when they were never in there to begin with, but presented it as if she put it in there originally is extremely suspicious. So this woman's story already seems to be falling apart, and if it happens to turn out totally false, we could see legal action as a result.

She added a date and a restaurant name.

Your evidence that she forged Moore's inscription is...what?

 

[j-mac]

Okay, maybe she did, although all she's saying is she added the date and the restaurant name. She should have said that before when this came out. But even if she did add "DA", she's still saying he wrote the inscription, and he's denying he knew her.

And I am guessing that is why her legal people wouldn't allow the supposed inscription to be analyzed by forensic handwriting specialists....

This is all BS, dirty tricks put out there by demo operatives....Moore, as I have said, if he did these things then he should have stepped down, but to date, I haven't seen any conclusive proof that any of this is anything more than deplorable BS out of the DNC.

 

[j-mac]

She added a date and a restaurant name.

Your evidence that she forged Moore's inscription is...what?

Why won't she let a handwriting expert analyze it?

 

[Thelion]

She is claiming to have added the date and location.

The inscription and Moore's signature were not altered in any way.

There is no "forgery", there is no "admission". Moore's defenders are grasping at straws.

 

[tres borrachos]

And I am guessing that is why her legal people wouldn't allow the supposed inscription to be analyzed by forensic handwriting specialists....

This is all BS, dirty tricks put out there by demo operatives....Moore, as I have said, if he did these things then he should have stepped down, but to date, I haven't seen any conclusive proof that any of this is anything more than deplorable BS out of the DNC.

The DNC must be the most amazing organization in the history of the world. They not only managed to find these woman, agree to get them to make accusations against Moore, fed them all their stories and talking points (except that little mistake they made letting one of them write the date and name of the restaurant in her yearbook), they also paid off many dozens of people all over Alabama to back them up, even going so far as saying they heard it from the accusers way back in the late 70s and early 80s when it happened. And not a single leak of this gigantic, and presumably very expensive, DNC conspiracy has happened to date. There had to be dozens of people involved, in coordination with the Washington Post, too. Dozens of people, and not even a hint from all of these people in on the conspiracy between the DNC and Wapo.

Sounds like the DNC is pretty damn efficient.

 

[TheGoverness]

The DNC must be the most amazing organization in the history of the world. They not only managed to find these woman, agree to get them to make accusations against Moore, fed them all their stories and talking points (except that little mistake they made letting one of them write the date and name of the restaurant in her yearbook), they also paid off many dozens of people all over Alabama to back them up, even going so far as saying they heard it from the accusers way back in the late 70s and early 80s when it happened. And not a single leak of this gigantic, and presumably very expensive, DNC conspiracy has happened to date. There had to be dozens of people involved, in coordination with the Washington Post, too. Dozens of people, and not even a hint from all of these people in on the conspiracy between the DNC and Wapo.

Sounds like the DNC is pretty damn efficient.

George Soros knows his ****!

 

[Herkamer63]

She added a date and a restaurant name.

Your evidence that she forged Moore's inscription is...what?

She just put it in there more recently. She didn't write this in 40 years ago. Don't you find that suspicious and too convenient to put that stuff in there, in the least bit? For a case like this that, it would be seen as altering evidence. Also, if this was a full blown criminal investigation, she could get into serious legal trouble for doing that. We don't even know what she said about the rest of the writings are actually Moore's. Even for a political campaign, she still could get hit hard with accusations of false testimony.

 

[Herkamer63]

Why won't she let a handwriting expert analyze it?

That's another thing, an investigator who specializes in handwriting forensics can figure this out fairly quickly. If her claims are true, she needs to prove it. Otherwise, why should we believe, because she says so, the rest is legit?