MaggieD
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 43,244
- Reaction score
- 44,664
- Location
- Chicago Area
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
You forgot:
You also omitted this:
And, you forgot this:
And, of course - there is the legality issue that you forgot to post as well:
Giving Bush credit for ending the war in Iraq, is a lot like giving Churchill, credit for dropping Fat Man on Hiroshima.
In 1959, according to a Gallup Poll, most Americans believed that Racial Segregation in Public Schools was better than the Supreme Courts decision in 1954, to make such segregation illegal.
Did the report ever talk about the fact that the Surge came AFTER President Bush essentially abandoned the mission that HE began in Afghanistan, allowing the insurgents to regain strength, while the President relegated his duty as Commander In Chief, by illegally invading Iraq, in his question for Iraq Oil fields and the establishment of unlawful PSA Contracts for Foreign Nationals?
The answer is: No.
So, the question that begs to be asked is, what would have happened, if President Bush, had followed through with his commitment to the United States Troops who remained behind in Afghanistan, to essentially fight a war that was unwindable given the support from the Commander In Chief himself, George W. "AWOL From the TANG" Bush?
Offering "report cards" without offering background on the teacher, the school, or the fact that the school was too poor to pay for its own text books - is "hardly much of a rebuttal."
Well, a very detailed post . . . having absolutely nothing to do with what I said. But if you need to keep in Bush-Bash-Practice, be my guest.