- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
- Messages
- 39,415
- Reaction score
- 10,107
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
None of that stuff...none of it...indicates obstruction of justice.
It's all a nothingburger spun out of nothing by way of spin and innuendo.
In the Lester Holt interview, President Trump confesses to obstruction of justice by declaring that the reason he fired Comey was to obstruct the Russia investigation.
His opinion that the investigation is "political" or "fabricated" is irrelevant, whether he's ultimately guilty in that investigation is also irrelevant. What we have is a slam dunk case for obstruction of justice on the information available to the public, alone. We know his intent was to obstruct the investigation. That is a crime in and of itself.