• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

NYT updates Kavanaugh 'bombshell' to note accuser doesn't recall alleged assault

BS-the person who was the alleged victim doesn't remember this nonsense.

That's not anywhere in the article. Friends have said it, not her. It's obvious why you and your buddies in this thread have decided to believe these friends, but the funny thing is that the friends aren't even saying she denies it.

So we've got seven people independently corroborating it, including the victim's mother. And we've got a pattern of behavior reported and independently corroborated.

Seems like an allegation against someone sitting in one of the most important positions of power in the US that might be worth investigating.
 
That's not anywhere in the article. Friends have said it, not her. It's obvious why you and your buddies in this thread have decided to believe these friends, but the funny thing is that the friends aren't even saying she denies it.

So we've got seven people independently corroborating it, including the victim's mother. And we've got a pattern of behavior reported and independently corroborated.

Seems like an allegation against someone sitting in one of the most important positions of power in the US that might be worth investigating.

Joe: I heard Kavanaugh assaulted Mary

Dave: Someone told me Kavanaugh whipped out his junk in Mary's face

Guido: I was at a party where someone told me Kavanaugh waved his pecker in Mary's face

Anna: I heard from Guido that someone told him that Kavanaugh exposed his schlong at a party at Yale 15 years ago

Betsy: I heard Anna tell Vickie that someone told her that Kavanaugh exposed himself 18 years ago

Vickie: Anna told me Kavanaugh was a pervert

Greg: I used to date Anna and she told me that she heard about Kavanaugh back when they went to Yale

Mary: I don't recall ever meeting Kavanaugh

Yeah seven confirmations "it happened"
 
Joe: I heard Kavanaugh assaulted Mary

Dave: Someone told me Kavanaugh whipped out his junk in Mary's face

Guido: I was at a party where someone told me Kavanaugh waved his pecker in Mary's face

Anna: I heard from Guido that someone told him that Kavanaugh exposed his schlong at a party at Yale 15 years ago

Betsy: I heard Anna tell Vickie that someone told her that Kavanaugh exposed himself 18 years ago

Vickie: Anna told me Kavanaugh was a pervert

Greg: I used to date Anna and she told me that she heard about Kavanaugh back when they went to Yale

Mary: I don't recall ever meeting Kavanaugh

Yeah seven confirmations "it happened"
WHat is really being said is "I was at a party with Brett Kavanaugh. He had his junk out. While I was gazing at his junk I saw someone use their hand and push Bretts junk into Debbies hand. (Debbie says I'm full of ****...but thats just how I remember it!)"

Hell...I dont even want to begin to think about the logistics of that idiots story.
 
Joe: I heard Kavanaugh assaulted Mary

Dave: Someone told me Kavanaugh whipped out his junk in Mary's face

Guido: I was at a party where someone told me Kavanaugh waved his pecker in Mary's face

Anna: I heard from Guido that someone told him that Kavanaugh exposed his schlong at a party at Yale 15 years ago

Betsy: I heard Anna tell Vickie that someone told her that Kavanaugh exposed himself 18 years ago

Vickie: Anna told me Kavanaugh was a pervert

Greg: I used to date Anna and she told me that she heard about Kavanaugh back when they went to Yale

Mary: I don't recall ever meeting Kavanaugh

Yeah seven confirmations "it happened"

Sounds like something worth investigating. But you don't care about rape victims so you'll arbitrarily side with friends who said the victim doesn't remember the incident to the extent that you would oppose even an investigation. Wonder why one would oppose an investigation that purportedly has absolutely no basis? There's only one reason really, which is that you know there's some credibility here and are worried about the political damage to your buddy Boof. Just like before, he should be calling for an investigation to clear his name, which he could then follow up with a libel suit. But he didn't do it during his confirmation and he's not doing it now.
 
Sounds like something worth investigating. But you don't care about rape victims so you'll arbitrarily side with friends who said the victim doesn't remember the incident to the extent that you would oppose even an investigation. Wonder why one would oppose an investigation that purportedly has absolutely no basis? There's only one reason really, which is that you know there's some credibility here and are worried about the political damage to your buddy Boof. Just like before, he should be calling for an investigation to clear his name, which he could then follow up with a libel suit. But he didn't do it during his confirmation and he's not doing it now.

Your dishonesty is hilarious-you talk about someone exposing themselves and then seamlessly shift to RAPE victims. Why should there be an investigation of complete BS that is over 30 years old when the alleged victim doesn't remember it?
 
The Goebbels Media strikes out again.

Trump has exposed and broken the insane Democrats and their Goebbels Media wing.

Yaaay! Now we can go back to talking about real news, like Obama's secret Kenyan birth certificate and how Trump U is better than Harvard!:lamo
 
Do you think Kavanaugh didn't try to have sex with Ford? And isn't it important that people know what Kavanaugh did during the course of his life that might impact how he would decide cases?

I think it's important that Kavanaugh either decided not to force himself on her, or was too drunk to do so, but do you think the incident Ford described didn't happen?

And do you support the tactics that Republicans are engaged in? Remember Garland? Was that okay? And let's talk about Trump. Republicans are willing to back one of the most incompetent and corrupt Presidents ever, for only two reasons: Abortion, and Immigration. Nothing else matters. And every action is justified so long as these two policy goals are being tackled.

imagine you're Kavanaugh...you know its all lies ...and people insist we debate on the "what ifs" of the lies. The left doesn't give one rip about truth.

If Dems had the same opportunity they would have done the same with a Garland pick. Its called being in control. Dems could have elected Hillary and got Garland....country decided otherwise. get over it

let's talk about Trump tactic ....not a good debate tactic imo
 
Sounds like something worth investigating. But you don't care about rape victims so you'll arbitrarily side with friends who said the victim doesn't remember the incident to the extent that you would oppose even an investigation. Wonder why one would oppose an investigation that purportedly has absolutely no basis? There's only one reason really, which is that you know there's some credibility here and are worried about the political damage to your buddy Boof. Just like before, he should be calling for an investigation to clear his name, which he could then follow up with a libel suit. But he didn't do it during his confirmation and he's not doing it now.
Every once in a while I see the **** you post and think...hmmm...can this guy BE more dishonest? And then...boom...just like that...you show you can.

Its ****ing hilarious watching people like YOU try to make Trump out to be a liar or to have zero integrity. You people make Trump look like a piker.
 
There were so many lies and distortions against Kavanaugh's accusers during the confirmation hearings that any attack on one of his accusers must be treated as a boy-who-cries-wolf story. And it's not like the NYT has much credibility any more, either. So I decided to do what anyone should do and look at the text myself.

Trump slams New York Times on new Brett Kavanaugh accusation

The important quote is:



Get that? It is not the alleged victim herself who claims not to recall the incident. It is her "friends" who are supposedly claiming that she doesn't recall it.

This does not mean that the newest allegation is false. With their latest example of poor reporting, the NYT is effectively making an unclear, emerging story even less clear. :doh

Blasey-Ford ****ed herself right in front of everyone, so what are you talking about. She couldn't remember ****, and had almost no supporters for her story. Kavenaugh got accused of drugging up the girls merely because he happen to be seen at the punch bowl. :lol:
 
Every once in a while I see the **** you post and think...hmmm...can this guy BE more dishonest? And then...boom...just like that...you show you can.

Its ****ing hilarious watching people like YOU try to make Trump out to be a liar or to have zero integrity. You people make Trump look like a piker.

the minute they refer to RAPE victims in the context of Kavanaugh, I know they aren't interested in honesty
 
Blasey-Ford ****ed herself right in front of everyone, so what are you talking about. She couldn't remember ****, and had almost no supporters for her story. Kavenaugh got accused of drugging up the girls merely because he happen to be seen at the punch bowl. :lol:

Obviously you didn't read what I said so let me say it for you again. Read slowly this time:

It is not the alleged victim herself who claims not to recall the incident. It is her "friends" who are supposedly claiming that she doesn't recall it.
 
Sounds like something worth investigating. But you don't care about rape victims so you'll arbitrarily side with friends who said the victim doesn't remember the incident to the extent that you would oppose even an investigation. Wonder why one would oppose an investigation that purportedly has absolutely no basis? There's only one reason really, which is that you know there's some credibility here and are worried about the political damage to your buddy Boof. Just like before, he should be calling for an investigation to clear his name, which he could then follow up with a libel suit. But he didn't do it during his confirmation and he's not doing it now.

Why have you become so emotionally attached to cherished lies you've learned from your favorite MSM outlet.
Your willingness to show an entire forum how bias you are in every post on every day is hilarious.
 
Every once in a while I see the **** you post and think...hmmm...can this guy BE more dishonest? And then...boom...just like that...you show you can.

Its ****ing hilarious watching people like YOU try to make Trump out to be a liar or to have zero integrity. You people make Trump look like a piker.

Trump is a liar. Another instance just today. Google "Iran preconditions" and look at the Trump Twitter. He was busted lying again. That doesn't bother you at all though, because your crush on him won't allow you to be shocked that he's lying now pretty much on a daily basis.
 
the minute they refer to RAPE victims in the context of Kavanaugh, I know they aren't interested in honesty
You think that you have ANY standing to properly discuss honesty and Kavanaugh at the same time?! :lamo
 
They corrected it within 24 hours. When has Trump ever corrected anything?
Trump isn't the news.

CNN and the NYT should have checked their stories before printing them not after. Has CNN corrected the spy story the went with last week?
 
You think that you have ANY standing to properly discuss honesty and Kavanaugh at the same time?! :lamo

of course I do, I did a wonderful job in schooling the ignorant a year ago, and it appears my job is not finished.
 
Should have stopped typing after first 3 words.

Deflection is not a defense
Don't blame him. He is afflicted with a severe case of TDS. He can't post anything without deflecting to Trump. Its sad really. :lol:
 
Is it true that Morning Joe did not support the NYT story?
 
Trump is a liar. Another instance just today. Google "Iran preconditions" and look at the Trump Twitter. He was busted lying again. That doesn't bother you at all though, because your crush on him won't allow you to be shocked that he's lying now pretty much on a daily basis.
And you make Trump look like a piker.
 
And you make Trump look like a piker.

Huh? What does that have to do with you approving of the President's constantly and inexplicable lies? Have you lost all morality while worshipping at the altar of Trump? If Obama uttered one lie, you would wet your undies all over the board. Trump tells one at least once a day, and you look the other way. This isn't about me. I'm not the POTUS. And I don't lie. The POTUS does, aided and abetted by people like you who have no instinct for the right thing to do.
 
People do lots of favors for people they're in romantic relationships with. Powerful people sometimes give powerful favors. Maybe Harris became involved with Brown just to advance her career and influence. Because that's unsubstantiated, and because Brown is just one man, I think this particular criticism against Harris is partisan crap.

ROTFLOL... we know she spread her legs and got ahead. There is no question about it. It’s not partisan, it’s fact.

There is zero evidence of Kavanaugh doing anything they’ve accused him of, yet the Goebbels Media ran with it... the miscreants were exposed as liars. We have the NYT sequel... Kavanaugh... The Miscreants Strike Again. That is partisan hackery coming from a vile rag that is poisoning the Left to new levels of dementia.

This poisoning is a regular occurrence... 2-years of Russian Collusion bull****, coupled with at least 85 significant lies from the Goebbels Media aimed at Trump. That’s one every 11.5 days.

Is it any wonder the Left is seriously brain ****ed?

Talk about people who have a difficult time losing an election. Amazing ****.
 
Last edited:
Huh? What does that have to do with you approving of the President's constantly and inexplicable lies? Have you lost all morality while worshipping at the altar of Trump? If Obama uttered one lie, you would wet your undies all over the board. Trump tells one at least once a day, and you look the other way. This isn't about me. I'm not the POTUS. And I don't lie. The POTUS does, aided and abetted by people like you who have no instinct for the right thing to do.
:lamo

YOU talking **** abut people that used to talk **** about Obama is ****ing hilarious. You sold your entire soul in the name of your ridiculous hatred.

on the other hand, I defy to to find even ONE TIME where I have defended Trumps character.

You wont. you cant. I suspect you know it which is why your lie about me defending his character just makes you look that much worse than Trump. Which is why no matter how bad Trump is....

You are worse.

You want to keep doubling down?
 
Back
Top Bottom