- Joined
- Dec 8, 2005
- Messages
- 9,525
- Reaction score
- 3,487
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump
So, first of all, why does any of that make any kind of difference? The point is that Bartiromo, and you by starting this thread, have spun Nunes' claims--and rather obviously so. That's the case regardless of which investigation is under discussion.
Second of all, are you saying that the Carter Page FISA warrant is not part of the counterintelligence investigation by the FBI? Seems pretty obvious that it is. So unless that's what you're saying, it's difficult to see your point. My point is that Nunes' memo of February 2018 alleges that the FISA warrant was made on grounds of the Steele Dossier. If he (and you) are now claiming there was something further, something that goes back from before the Dossier, that memo, which had achieved the status of political canon (and cannon) in Trumpworld, is misleading--as Nunes' own words and behavior now show.
Dismiss that all you want; it's obviously correct.
Other parts you don't address. Your post is an obvious attempt at further spin. Anyone not already in the grip of some twisted ideology who watches the video will see what I'm talking about.
So, first of all, why does any of that make any kind of difference? The point is that Bartiromo, and you by starting this thread, have spun Nunes' claims--and rather obviously so. That's the case regardless of which investigation is under discussion.
Second of all, are you saying that the Carter Page FISA warrant is not part of the counterintelligence investigation by the FBI? Seems pretty obvious that it is. So unless that's what you're saying, it's difficult to see your point. My point is that Nunes' memo of February 2018 alleges that the FISA warrant was made on grounds of the Steele Dossier. If he (and you) are now claiming there was something further, something that goes back from before the Dossier, that memo, which had achieved the status of political canon (and cannon) in Trumpworld, is misleading--as Nunes' own words and behavior now show.
Dismiss that all you want; it's obviously correct.
Other parts you don't address. Your post is an obvious attempt at further spin. Anyone not already in the grip of some twisted ideology who watches the video will see what I'm talking about.
