• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump[W:895]

Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Who knows what they were trying to hide...or, even, if they were. Why don't you have an investigation to find out?

Oh...wait...we've had one going on for a year. And what has it found? Nothing.

But hey...keep the hope alive, right? There's GOT to be something.

Eleven months and five days and you are whining like a stuck pig. Man up, settle down.:

May 17, 2017: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017–present)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitewater_controversy#The_Kenneth_Starr_investigation
.....
The Kenneth Starr investigation
In August 1994, Kenneth Starr[30] was appointed by a three-judge panel to continue the Whitewater investigation, replacing Robert B. Fiske, who had been specially appointed by the attorney general, prior to the re-enactment of the Independent Counsel law. Fiske was replaced because he had been chosen and appointed by Janet Reno, Clinton's attorney general, creating a conflict of interest...

...State prosecutors issued an arrest warrant for Hale in early July 1996, charging that Hale had misrepresented the solvency of his insurance company, National Savings Life, to the state insurance commission. The prosecutors also alleged in court papers that Hale had made those misrepresentations to conceal the fact that he had looted the insurance company. Hale said that any infraction was a technicality and that no one had lost any money.[35] In March 1999, Hale was convicted of the first charge, with the jury recommending a 21-day jail sentence.[35]

Starr drafted an impeachment referral to the House of Representatives in the fall of 1997, alleging that there was "substantial and credible evidence" that Bill Clinton had committed perjury regarding Hale's allegations.

Theodore B. Olson, who with several associates, launched the plan that later became known as the "Arkansas Project", wrote several essays for The American Spectator, accusing Clinton and many of his associates of wrongdoing. The first of those pieces appeared in February 1994, alleging a wide variety of criminal offenses by the Clintons and others, including Webster Hubbell. These allegations led to the discovery that Hubbell, a friend and former Rose Law Firm partner of Hillary Clinton, had committed multiple frauds, mostly against his own firm. Hillary Clinton, instead of being complicit in Hubbell's crimes, had been among his victims....
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

The Foxnews article alledges the FBI fired Steele in September 2016 for "talking to the press." If that's true, then why did the FBI meet with Steele in Rome in early October 2016 and offer him $50K to cooberate the dossier?

Good question.

And here's some more good questions: If they fired him in Sep, how long was He working for them? Since Jul when the FBI started investigating Trump? Before then? Could that bogus stuff be the unofficial intelligence they used to start the investigation?

As Nunes said...you peel back one layer and you find more questions.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

That official intelligence would have to come from 5 Eyes AND/OR from US intelligence. What he said is that no "official intelligence" started the investigation into Trump.

So...the question is, if there was no official intelligence, what information was given to the FBI that actually started the investigation? Who did it come from? Was it reliable? Was it that bogus info from Fusion GPS? Was it the stuff Blumenthal told the State Department?

As Nunes said, you peel back one layer and it opens up more questions. He's still looking for answers.
Well without researching it, I remember it coming from the Aussie Ambassador that heard it from the drunken Papadopoulis in a London bar.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Who knows what they were trying to hide...or, even, if they were. Why don't you have an investigation to find out?

Oh...wait...we've had one going on for a year. And what has it found? Nothing.

But hey...keep the hope alive, right? There's GOT to be something.

You haven't heard anything because Mueller is running a proper and professional investigation. When he's finished then you will hear from him.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

This letter is nonsense.

1. "Media reports indicate that the Committee's memorandum
contains highly classified material confidentially provided by the Department to the Committee
in a secure facility."

LOL!! Since when does the DOJ rely on "media reports"? Don't tell me you are comfortable with the DOJ accepting "unnamed sources".

2. This letter was written before the Nunes memo was created and sent to the White House for approval. At that point, the DOJ and FBI had ample time to examine the actual memo for classified information. The WH approved the release of the memo to the public.

Nunes took all required and necessary steps to deal with any classified information. Nothing was handles in an irresponsible manner.

No it was created when he wanted to bring it up for a vote for it's release without first giving the DOJ a proper opportunity to review it. That memo also revealed the identity of FISA warrant and the date that it was approved. If that isn't classified information than what is?
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Good question.

And here's some more good questions: If they fired him in Sep, how long was He working for them? Since Jul when the FBI started investigating Trump? Before then? Could that bogus stuff be the unofficial intelligence they used to start the investigation?

As Nunes said...you peel back one layer and you find more questions.

You can't fire somebody that you never hired.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Good question.

..If they fired him in Sep, how long was He working for them? Since Jul when the FBI started investigating Trump? Before then? Could that bogus stuff be the unofficial intelligence they used to start the investigation?..

The FBI "firing" of Steele="deep state victim Trump" , nonsense.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-fbi-and-the-dossier/?utm_term=.739cca38debf

..about Christopher Steele, the FBI and the Trump 'dossier'
Glenn Kessler Jan. 9, 2018

..“Near the start of July on his own initiative — without the permission of the U.S. company that hired him — he sent a report he had written for that firm to a contact at the FBI,” David Corn of Mother Jones reported in October 2016, before the election, without identifying Steele as his source...
https://www.motherjones.com/politic...ing-russian-operation-cultivate-donald-trump/
..
In June, the former Western intelligence officer—who spent almost two decades on Russian intelligence matters..—was assigned the task of researching Trump’s dealings in Russia and elsewhere, according to the former spy and his associates in this American firm. .. “It started off as a fairly general inquiry,” says the former spook, who asks not to be identified. But when he dug into Trump, he notes, he came across troubling information indicating connections between Trump and the Russian government. ..he says, “there was an established exchange of information between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin of mutual benefit.”

This was, the former spy remarks, “an extraordinary situation.” He regularly consults with US government agencies on Russian matters, and near the start of July on his own initiative—without the permission of the US company that hired him—he sent a report he had written for that firm to a contact at the FBI, according to the former intelligence officer and his American associates, who asked not to be identified. (He declines to identify the FBI contact.) ..

Mother Jones has reviewed that report and other memos this former spy wrote..
A “few weeks” after Steele’s initial approach to the FBI, “the bureau asked him for information on his sources and their reliability and on how he had obtained his reports,” Corn reported in a January 2017 article. “He was also asked to continue to send copies of his subsequent reports to the bureau.”

In other words, by the end of the July, the leadership of the FBI was paying attention. Whether Steele’s initial approach to the FBI was as important as other elements — such as the DNC hack or the Australian communication — is unclear.

Simpson and Peter Fritsch,:. “As we told the Senate Judiciary Committee in August, our sources said the dossier was taken so seriously because it corroborated reports the bureau had received from other sources, including one inside the Trump camp,” apparently ..Papadopoulos.

[Update: In his testimony ..Senate Judiciary Committee, released on Jan. 9.), Simpson said Steele’s memo was received favorably by the FBI because it tracked with their own intelligence. “My understanding was that they believed Chris at this point — that they believed Chris might be credible because they had other intelligence that indicated the same thing and one of those pieces of intelligence was a human source from inside the Trump organization,” Simpson said, apparently also a reference to Papadopoulos.]

..n this summer period, the FBI obtained a secret court order to monitor Page’s communications,.. According to CNN, Steele’s reports were part of the justification used to win approval of the court order, though the FBI apparently corroborated the information as part of its investigation..

..however, did not announce until Sept. 26 that he was taking a leave of absence because of negative news reporting on his Russia connections. Such a late approval of the FISA order does not fit with the timeline, but it conveniently suggests the FBI did not obtain a court order on a Trump adviser when he was active in the campaign.

[Update: The memo on the FISA application written by the majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee, released Feb. 2, 2018, states that the initial application was on Oct. 21, 2016, later than previously disclosed.]..

...The Post reported that the FBI had reached an agreement with Steele... [Update: In his testimony, Simpson revealed ..Steele at one point broke off communications with the FBI after the New York Times published an article saying the agency had found little evidence of ties between Trump and Russia.].
..
Steele was not being paid as an informant when he was in communication with the FBI, but he was certainly informing officials about his reports..
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Unlike Mueller, Congress actually investigated that meeting. They even interviewed the lawyer. She said it was about adoptions.

Oh well, Trump haters will hate...and nothing will get in their way.

It wasn't Congressional committee that interviewed her. It was the Senate committee and they had to go to Berlin Germany because she claimed she wouldn't be safe in the US. Not sure how she thinks that Germany would be safer than anywhere else. The more likely explanation is that she probably fears that Mueller may have a sealed indictment on her.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Unlike Mueller, Congress actually investigated that meeting. They even interviewed the lawyer. She said it was about adoptions.

Oh well, Trump haters will hate...and nothing will get in their way.

When I presented the background of that very lawyer, you replied.:

Thanks for the offer, but I decline. Your proposed discussion is off-topic.

Start a thread if you want.

The lawyer smells because Don Jr. admitted he not only failed to disclose the Trump Tower meeting, as did Kushner,
who was obligated to disclose if he hoped to be cleared for his WH, ultra secret security level, clearance, but he and
his handler dad POTUS, mishandled actual disclosure of the meeting's purpose to a controversy in which Hope Hicks
was accused by Trump defense attorney team spokesperson Marc Corallo, of prompting his immediate resignation, he
claimed, in an effort to distance himself from exposure to a obstruction charge.

And, the lawyer smells because she is much too close to Trump's Russian circle, when you follow the money, behavior, and
statements.

Everything You Need to Know about Natalia Veselnitskaya ...
https://themoscowproject.org/explainers/everything-need-know-natalia-veselnitskaya-contextualized/
Oct 26, 2017 - In the process, Veselnitskaya developed a relationship with Pyotr Katsyv, at the time the region's minister of transportation, in part through husband, Alexander Mitusov, who served as Katsyv's deputy beginning in 2005. According to The New York Times, Veselnitskaya has represented the Katsyv family for ...

Natalia Veselnitskaya, Lawyer Who Met Trump Jr., Seen as Fearsome ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/...lnitskaya-donald-trump-jr-russian-lawyer.html
Jul 11, 2017 - In one instance, a small nonprofit, Spravedlivost, that tried to expose corruption in the Moscow region, published a series of articles accusing a group that included Ms. Veselnitskaya, her former husband, Aleksandr Mitusov, and Mr. Katsyv of being corporate raiders who used their clout in the regional ...
 
Last edited:
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Well without researching it, I remember it coming from the Aussie Ambassador that heard it from the drunken Papadopoulis in a London bar.

Maybe...
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

You haven't heard anything because Mueller is running a proper and professional investigation. When he's finished then you will hear from him.

Proper...yeah...LOL!!

Mueller is going off in so many useless directions, he won't have anything useful to tell anyone when the plug is finally pulled.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

No it was created when he wanted to bring it up for a vote for it's release without first giving the DOJ a proper opportunity to review it. That memo also revealed the identity of FISA warrant and the date that it was approved. If that isn't classified information than what is?

He never intended to release anything without proper approval. The vote was part of the process, sending it to the WH also. Nunes did all of that. That letter you linked was nonsense. Totally unnecessary.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Unlike Mueller, Congress actually investigated that meeting. They even interviewed the lawyer. She said it was about adoptions.

Oh well, Trump haters will hate...and nothing will get in their way.

It is as if you are sealed inside a compartment in which only the best propaganda team Trump can buy is reaching you, vs real world POV
shaped by journalistic fact checking and reporting sourced information exposure opportunies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/25/us/politics/trump-digenova-toensing.html
Trump Won’t Hire 2 Lawyers Whose
Appointments Were Announced Days Ago
By MAGGIE HABERMAN, MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT and MARK LANDLER MARCH 25, 2018

..“The president is disappointed that conflicts prevent Joe diGenova and Victoria
Toensing from joining the president’s special counsel legal team,” Mr. Trump’s
personal lawyer, Jay Sekulow, said in a statement on Sunday morning. “However,
those conflicts do not prevent them from assisting the president in other legal
matters. The president looks forward to working with them.”
..But beyond that, Ms. Toensing is representing Mark Corallo, who was the
spokesman for Mr. Trump’s legal team in 2017 before they parted ways.
Mr. Corallo has told investigators that he was concerned that a close aide to Mr.
Trump, Hope Hicks, may have been planning to obstruct justice during the drafting
of a statement about a meeting between a Russian lawyer and Donald Trump Jr.
during the campaign.
Ms. Hicks’s lawyer has strongly denied that suggestion, and White House aides
said Mr. Corallo’s assertion had come up in discussions with the president as he
weighed whether to go ahead with Mr. diGenova and Ms. Toensing..

https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/who...aire-with-ties-to-kushner-and-putin-1.5435007
Who Is Lev Leviev, the Israeli Billionaire With Ties to Jared Kushner and Putin
Leviev is best known for having cracked the world diamond market monopoly of the De Beers cartel in the 1980s, and for real estate holdings and construction deals from Wall Street to the West Bank

David B. Green Jul 25, 2017 11:06 PM
.....
Suffice it to say that Leviev has retained control of Africa-Israel, whose holdings today include energy, steel production, hotels, and a number of fashion designers. Along the way, he has been criticized, and his businesses boycotted, attacked for massive construction projects in several different West Bank settlements; his bid a decade ago to become the operator of Israel’s first privately owned prison was stymied by the Supreme Court; and he has been dogged by accusations of the worst types of abuse at his mines in Angola.

This week’s news stories don’t link Leviev with specific accusations; rather, they indicate a number of business and social relationships that connect him to Vladimir Putin and Kremlin-related businesses, as well as to the Trump Organization. Leviev was a business partner of Prevezon Holdings, the Russian firm that was accused of money-laundering, and that, after it was represented by Natalia Veselnitskaya, got off with a $6 million slap on the wrist. The Prevezon scam had been exposed in 2009 by Russian whistleblower accountant Sergei Magnitsky, who a short time later died in a Moscow prison under suspicious conditions. It was his death that led to the American passage of the sanctions – in the form of the Magnitsky Act – that Veselnitskaya said she was lobbying to have cancelled when she met with Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner and others at Trump Tower last summer. It was to avenge the Magnitsky sanctions that Putin in 2012 abruptly prohibited American citizens from adopting any more children from Russia; readers will remember that Trump has said that “adoptions” was the subject of his off-the-record second conversation with Putin at the G-20 meeting in Hamburg two weeks ago. Now, the Justice Department’s decision to settle with Prevezon last May is likely to come under renewed scrutiny by investigators in the U.S....
 
Last edited:
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

You can't fire somebody that you never hired.

What? They were paying him. He worked for them.

Quit spouting nonsense.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

It wasn't Congressional committee that interviewed her. It was the Senate committee and they had to go to Berlin Germany because she claimed she wouldn't be safe in the US. Not sure how she thinks that Germany would be safer than anywhere else. The more likely explanation is that she probably fears that Mueller may have a sealed indictment on her.

Dude. A "Senate committee" is a Congressional committee. Besides, I said, "Congress actually ...etc."

Stop trying to nitpick and speculate your way out of this. You are acting silly.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

When I presented the background of that very lawyer, you replied.:



The lawyer smells because Don Jr. admitted he not only failed to disclose the Trump Tower meeting, as did Kushner,
who was obligated to disclose if he hoped to be cleared for his WH, ultra secret security level, clearance, but he and
his handler dad POTUS, mishandled actual disclosure of the meeting's purpose to a controversy in which Hope Hicks
was accused by Trump defense attorney team spokesperson Marc Corallo, of prompting his immediate resignation, he
claimed, in an effort to distance himself from exposure to a obstruction charge.

And, the lawyer smells because she is much too close to Trump's Russian circle, when you follow the money, behavior, and
statements.

Yeah...you're right. I let you suck me into this off-topic BS anyway. Thanks for the tip.

You are dismissed.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Proper..LOL!!

Mueller is going off in so many useless directions, he won't have anything useful to tell anyone..

Rosenstein supervises Mueller and has found nothing to criticize about Mueller or his investigation when he is pressed repeatedly by our
elected representatives.

Meanwhile, this thuggish element is attacking and obstructing Trump appointed republican Rosenstein and esteemed republican special
counsel, Robert Mueller.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/21/us/politics/rod-rosenstein-justice-department.html
As Rod Rosenstein Battles to Protect Mueller, His Tactics Could Cost the Justice Dept. By KATIE BENNER, ..LaFRANIERE and ..FANDOS APRIL 21, 2018

..Rosenstein, ..staved off his attackers on Capitol Hill largely by appeasing them. .., he allowed key Republican legislators to review an almost completely unredacted F.B.I. memo on the opening of a still active investigation of the Trump campaign, a rare step. He later summoned two other Republicans, Mr. Jordan and .. Meadows of North Carolina, to his office to pledge that the Justice Department would be more responsive to theirrequests.And on Thursday, threatened with a subpoena, he gave a relatively large group of lawmakers access to memos written by the former F.B.I. director ..Comey about his interactions with Mr. Trump. The documents are considered to be important evidence in a potential obstruction of justice case against the presidentbeing weighed by Mr. Mueller.But still other Republican demands remain unmet, and Democrats have warned that ..setting disturbing precedents that chip away at the independencethat the Justice Department has maintained since President ..Nixon triedto thwart the Watergate investigation..

Washington Monthly | The Odd Chabad Connection Between Putin ...

Nov 27, 2017 - Starting in 1999, [Vladimir] Putin enlisted two of his closest confidants, the oligarchs Lev Leviev and Roman Abramovich, who would go on to become Chabad's biggest patrons worldwide, to create the Federation of Jewish Communities of Russia under the leadership of Chabad rabbi Berel Lazar, who would come to be known as “Putin’s rabbi.” ..​


Sholom Rubashkin: Why Trump Commuted His Sentence | Fortune
Why Trump Commuted the Sentence of Sholom Rubashkin, Kosher Meatpacking Executive

By ANDREW NUSCA December 21, 2017

The White House announced on Wednesday that President Donald Trump commuted the 27-year prison sentence of Sholom Rubashkin, the former executive of what was once the United States’ largest kosher meatpacking operation..

Supporters (including the Chabad-Lubavitch ..have long argued Rubashkin’s sentence was considered severe compared to cases such as Enron’s Jeff Skilling ..and WorldCom’s..

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2008/05/highprofile_bris_on_sunday_you.html
May 30, 2008 Zina Sapir, daughter of real estate mogul Tamir Sapir and her husband real estate mogul Rotem Rosen, CEO of Africa Israel USA...
....Rotem Rosen, Lev Leviev’s right hand man, is very grateful as the grave is believed to be a holy site [SUB][SUP]..
...[/SUP][/SUB]
Tamir and Rotem were married at Mar-A-Lago, with performances by the *****cat Dolls. ..The guest list for the bris on Sunday reads like a who’s who in real estate with such names as Donald Trump, Jared Kushner,...

Who are the mystery men photographed sharing cigars ... - ABC News

abcnews.go.com/Politics/mystery-men-photographed-sharing-cigars-michael.../story?...
4 days ago - Among those shown sharing cigars with Cohen outside his Upper East Side hotel on Friday were two men who appeared to be Rotem Rosen and Jerry Rotonda.
 
Last edited:
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Notice how none of these three actually listened to the interview before commenting.
What for? Nunes has a track record for creating baseless conspiracy theories. He has left so much egg on the GOP's face, it's mind boggling that they've allowed him to maintain his status as chairman.

He has no interest in actually investigating Russian espionage, just covering for the WH.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Unlike Mueller, Congress actually investigated that meeting. They even interviewed the lawyer. She said it was about adoptions.

Oh well, Trump haters will hate...and nothing will get in their way.

I'm not getting into all that, but Mycroft keeps proclaiming, falsely, that the meeting had to do with adoptions, which this explicitly show it wasn't.

Par for the course for a Trump supporter and a birther to make such false claims.

It likely was about "adoptions"... surely that was discussed.

After all, Russia wanted something in return. Of course, "adoptions" is the code for relief from the Magnitsky Act. When Congress passed sanctions against Russia and Obama signed it into law, Russia responded by ending its adoption program with the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitsky_Act

So, we have this benign sounding issue of "adoptions" that is really a code for relief from sanctions. Some of our more gullible conservative friends likely think that the leadership team at the Trump campaign would actually take valuable time to discuss adoptions with Russians. Yes, that seems like a really good use of their time when their campaign was struggling. Of course that is not the main conversation. It was a multi-faceted meeting that Trump & Co had with the Russians in June 2016, that had something of incredible interest to Paul Manafort and Jr. I'm sure we will be learning of the details real soon.

So if a campaign is offered proof of a crime, they should ignore it? The "dirt" on the Clinton campaign was knowingly accepting foreign campaign contributions, a clear FEC violation. What do you propose they should have done?

Cite for this please....

How about one of you liberals actually listen to the clip and offer a critique of what he said.

You aren't getting it. Nunes has no credibility. It really doesn't matter what he says, no one cares. You should no better than to expect people to waste their time on someone with no cred.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...tside_trump_world_paul_ryan_is_complicit.html

If you want to make a point, post someone with credibility. If there is a point to be made, then there will be someone besides Nunes making that point otherwise we get to assume there is no point.
 
Last edited:
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Good question.

And here's some more good questions: If they fired him in Sep, how long was He working for them? Since Jul when the FBI started investigating Trump? Before then? Could that bogus stuff be the unofficial intelligence they used to start the investigation?

As Nunes said...you peel back one layer and you find more questions.

Well, if the FBI offered Steele $50K in early October 2016 to continue his investigation and he stopped cooperating with the FBI in late October...then he worked for them less than a month...and was never paid.

Nunes isn't peeling an onion...he's planting fake news in the media.
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

It likely was about "adoptions"... surely that was discussed.

After all, Russia wanted something in return. Of course, "adoptions" is the code for relief from the Magnitsky Act. When Congress passed sanctions against Russia and Obama signed it into law, Russia responded by ending its adoption program with the US.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnitsky_Act

So, we have this benign sounding issue of "adoptions" that is really a code for relief from sanctions. Some of our more gullible conservative friends likely think that the leadership team at the Trump campaign would actually take valuable time to discuss adoptions with Russians. Yes, that seems like a really good use of their time when their campaign was struggling. Of course that is not the main conversation. It was a multi-faceted meeting that Trump & Co had with the Russians in June 2016, that had something of incredible interest to Paul Manafort and Jr. I'm sure we will be learning of the details real soon.



Cite for this please...

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789839522140166?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=about:srcdoc

"would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia..."

So asking, what should they have done?
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

Rosenstein supervises Mueller and has found nothing to criticize about Mueller or his investigation when he is pressed repeatedly by our
elected representatives.

Meanwhile, this thuggish element is attacking and obstructing Trump appointed republican Rosenstein and esteemed republican special
counsel, Robert Mueller.

Except when supporting demoting/removing/firing Strozk, Page, and Ohr.

"esteemed"...pander more?
 
Re: Nunes: There Was NO OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USED to Start DOJ Spying on Trump

https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789839522140166?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=about:srcdoc

"would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia..."

So asking, what should they have done?

So your cite is a Donald Jr. tweet? Interesting.

So, to answer your question, if they really believed that, they should have turned the matter over to the FBI.... that would be normal protocol. In no case do you take the meeting.

If there were matters that would "incriminate Hillary" neither Don Jr nor Manafort were qualified nor appropriate for the meeting.

Taking that meeting was at least foolish/reckless and at most criminal, but in no case noble or appropriate. We will soon find out where on the spectrum it is.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom