Not one technology came out of 'academic science'

[zyzygy]

So? That doesn't mean botany is ONLY an academic subject.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Yes, there is not one technology that came out of 'academic science'. ALL, yes all technologies were invented
before 'academic science' 'had".
An example is the transistor. 'Academic Science' tells us the transistor is here because of quantum mechanics ( qm is bollocks by the way!). Nothing could be further from the truth.
The transistor was invented before quantum mechanics, And so it is with a whole lot of other inventions.
In reality 'academic science' simply can't deliver because the theories are very very wrong.
So, let's face it, people in 'academic science', 'scientists' have only a job to get them off the streets and earn some money to be able to buy some food. That's it. Nothing more.

Hi Palandro.
Please enlighten us as to your background on the subject.
Do you hold any STEM-related degrees or have any significant work experience in these fields?

 

[Evilroddy]

Jack Nicholson is the father of QM.

Zyzygy:

No, no. Jack Nicholson is linked to the Shining, which was an ultra-violent catastrophe which produced the concept of "redrum". But the ultraviolet catastrophe which kicked off the quantum revolution in the late 19th Century was solved by Max Planck and his development of the "quantum" concept of energy.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

 

[zyzygy]

well, maybe you can state ignorance about what?

Science, debating. In another thread, you claim that a certain book is chock full of evidence but you cannot or will not post any evidence. That is the debating equivalent of sky diving with a concrete parachute.

 

[zyzygy]

Zyzygy:

No, no. Jack Nicholson is linked to the Shining, which was an ultra-violent catastrophe which produced the concept of "redrum". But the ultraviolet catastrophe which kicked off the quantum revolution in the late 19th Century was solved by Max Planck and his development of the "quantum" concept of energy.

Cheers.
Evilroddy.

I stand corrected. But he was red hot at clearing up the mess made by Manson's minions. It's true, it says so in a book.

 

[zyzygy]

Hi Palandro.
Please enlighten us as to your background on the subject.
Do you hold any STEM-related degrees or have any significant work experience in these fields?

Let us wait until he proves the theories to be wrong.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

You mean the particle accelarator? Well, that is a development of the old tv tube, which was a development of the original Crookes Tube.
invented by Sir William Crookes, (1832-1919).A chemical and occult researcher and NOT, I repeat NOT an academic physicist.

Tell us how the cathode-ray tube differs from the original Crookes tube specifically in relation to the role of magnetics.
PS: Crookes was a physicist, that is not open for dispute.

Although Crookes revered Hofmann, he did not share his primary interest in organic chemistry.

 

[beancounter]

Yes, there is not one technology that came out of 'academic science'. ALL, yes all technologies were invented
before 'academic science' 'had".
An example is the transistor. 'Academic Science' tells us the transistor is here because of quantum mechanics ( qm is bollocks by the way!). Nothing could be further from the truth.
The transistor was invented before quantum mechanics, And so it is with a whole lot of other inventions.
In reality 'academic science' simply can't deliver because the theories are very very wrong.
So, let's face it, people in 'academic science', 'scientists' have only a job to get them off the streets and earn some money to be able to buy some food. That's it. Nothing more.

Source?

 

[zyzygy]

Everything computer related clearly didn't come out of "Modern Academic Science"

not the early magnetic disks ,not the first program language, not the logical AND circuit element basic to all computers, flip flops (for basics of memory in computers),harddisks(hdd) , hypertext , and on and on it goes.

No scientists or inventors were university educated. Got it.

 

[zyzygy]

Source?

His imagination.

 

[beancounter]

His imagination.

Yep, that's the point I'm trying to make.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Let us wait until he proves the theories to be wrong.

Uh unhhh, I've been in the video field since 1982 and I'll be damned if some yahoo is going to spout nonsense from a position of ignorance and expect to be taken seriously. If this guy can't tell us the role magnetics plays in the Crookes tube, then he's a ranting idiot standing on the streetcorner handing out sweaty conspiracy theory mimeographs about the end of the world.

Twenty-some years ago that is where you found people like that. Now they have internet access.

 

[zyzygy]

You mean the particle accelarator? Well, that is a development of the old tv tube, which was a development of the original Crookes Tube.
invented by Sir William Crookes, (1832-1919).A chemical and occult researcher and NOT, I repeat NOT an academic physicist.

Repeat away!

Sir William Crookes OM PRS (; 17 June 1832 – 4 April 1919) was an English chemist and physicist who attended the Royal College of Chemistry in London, and worked on spectroscopy. He was a pioneer of vacuum tubes, inventing the Crookes tube which was made in 1875.


William Crookes: British chemist and physicist (born: 1832 - died: 1919)

 

[zyzygy]

Uh unhhh, I've been in the video field since 1982 and I'll be damned if some yahoo is going to spout nonsense from a position of ignorance and expect to be taken seriously. If this guy can't tell us the role magnetics plays in the Crookes tube, then he's a ranting idiot standing on the streetcorner handing out sweaty conspiracy theory mimeographs about the end of the world.

Twenty-some years ago that is where you found people like that. Now they have internet access.

He is following the CT fan modus operandi. Make claims, provide no evidence.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Repeat away!

Sir William Crookes OM PRS (; 17 June 1832 – 4 April 1919) was an English chemist and physicist who attended the Royal College of Chemistry in London, and worked on spectroscopy. He was a pioneer of vacuum tubes, inventing the Crookes tube which was made in 1875.


William Crookes: British chemist and physicist (born: 1832 - died: 1919)

By the way, as you are no doubt already aware, comparison of a particle accelerator to a CRT is like comparing a Cougnot steam wagon to an NHRA dragster.

 

[zyzygy]

If Einstein (the half brain :lamo:lamo) was wrong and relativity does not exist then how do cosmic rays mange to get to the surface of the Earth, Palandro?

 

[zyzygy]

Yes, there is not one technology that came out of 'academic science'. ALL, yes all technologies were invented
before 'academic science' 'had".
An example is the transistor. 'Academic Science' tells us the transistor is here because of quantum mechanics ( qm is bollocks by the way!). Nothing could be further from the truth.
The transistor was invented before quantum mechanics, And so it is with a whole lot of other inventions.
In reality 'academic science' simply can't deliver because the theories are very very wrong.
So, let's face it, people in 'academic science', 'scientists' have only a job to get them off the streets and earn some money to be able to buy some food. That's it. Nothing more.

Quantum physics is probably the most precise scientific discipline ever devised by humankind. It can predict certain properties with extreme accuracy, to 10 decimal places, which later experiments confirm exactly.

Seven common myths about quantum physics.


QM is bollocks! That is such an erudite scientific statement! A Nobel Prize is in the offing!

 

[zyzygy]

Yes, there is not one technology that came out of 'academic science'. ALL, yes all technologies were invented
before 'academic science' 'had".
An example is the transistor. 'Academic Science' tells us the transistor is here because of quantum mechanics ( qm is bollocks by the way!). Nothing could be further from the truth.
The transistor was invented before quantum mechanics, And so it is with a whole lot of other inventions.
In reality 'academic science' simply can't deliver because the theories are very very wrong.
So, let's face it, people in 'academic science', 'scientists' have only a job to get them off the streets and earn some money to be able to buy some food. That's it. Nothing more.

If QM is bollocks then please explain the Ultraviolet Catastrophy without using Max Plank's theory of quanta. If you can do that complete with the maths then you will turn the world of physics on its head and a Nobel Prize is yours.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

The Great Expert Palandro seems to have abandoned the thread. :lamo

 

[Palandro]

QM is bollocks! That is such an erudite scientific statement! A Nobel Prize is in the offing!

Yep, of course QM is bollocks. A Nobel Prize? lol, that just accentuates my point!
It if is lied and ridiculous one gets a ..Nobel Prize. Nobel Prizes aren't worth a thing ( well the material it is made of of course.)

But you seem to be religiously attached to the religion called science, eh (scientism?!

How come?

 

[Palandro]

The Great Expert Palandro seems to have abandoned the thread. :lamo

Where did I wrote I am an expert? I just researched some things anybodey can do.

 

[Palandro]

By the way, as you are no doubt already aware, comparison of a particle accelerator to a CRT is like comparing a Cougnot steam wagon to an NHRA dragster.

You have to read better, that is not exaxtly what I wrote!

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

Where did I wrote I am an expert? I just researched some things anybodey can do.

You didn't answer my questions about the Crookes tube, because you can't.
You aren't answering ANY technical questions, because you can't.
You blather and screech about crap you know ZERO about.
My questions to you might as well be written in Sanskrit, that much is obvious.
You're as far from an expert as it is possible to be.
You are "some guy on the internet" who THINKS they know something, when they don't.
You are a walking talking poster child for Duning-Krueger Syndrome.
We have a glut of those and a shortage of trained, educated persons.
You didn't research a goddamn thing, you just "heard something" and now you think you know.
You DON'T.
You're just another "College of Hard Knocks at the University of Life" graduate, also known as Trump University.
Find a different hobby.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

You have to read better, that is not exaxtly what I wrote!

A particle accelerator is not related to a CRT.
Tell us what the negative pressure is in a particle accelerator, then tell us what it is in a CRT.

Everyone else, no helping, this is something Google can't answer, by the way.

 

[Palandro]

You didn't answer my questions about the Crookes tube, because you can't.
You aren't answering ANY technical questions, because you can't.
You blather and screech about crap you know ZERO about.
My questions to you might as well be written in Sanskrit, that much is obvious.
You're as far from an expert as it is possible to be.
You are "some guy on the internet" who THINKS they know something, when they don't.
You are a walking talking poster child for Duning-Krueger Syndrome.
We have a glut of those and a shortage of trained, educated persons.
You didn't research a goddamn thing, you just "heard something" and now you think you know.
You DON'T.
You're just another "College of Hard Knocks at the University of Life" graduate, also known as Trump University.
Find a different hobby.

Oh boy oh boy,was it something I wrote?

Only one big Ad Hominem, which is, as we all know, a very stupid 'argument".
And for this: "You're as far from an expert as it is possible to be."

Well, calmy and in a relax state just read my postings,
I nowhere claim to be an 'expert", what you are saying here is plain stupidity,

Btw being an 'expert' is not a very good place to be in, btw. but I doubnt if you understand this.