- Joined
- Jan 28, 2013
- Messages
- 94,823
- Reaction score
- 28,342
- Location
- Williamsburg, Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Prove it
Read the link. It's all there.
Prove it
Read the link. It's all there.
Refuted by Shaviv.
Actually supports Shaviv's case.
No it doesnt
[FONT="]. . . The reason behind this behavior is of course the finite heat capacity of the climate system. If you heat the system for a given duration, it takes time for the system to reach equilibrium. If the heating starts to decrease while the temperature is still below equilibrium, then the temperature will continue rising as the forcing starts to decrease. Interestingly, since the late 1990’s (specifically the 1997 el Niño) the temperature has been increasing at a rate much lower than predicted by the models appearing in the IPCC reports (the so called “global warming hiatus”). . . .[/FONT]
[B][URL="http://www.sciencebits.com/bundestag"]My experience at the German Bundestag's Environment Committee in a pre-COP24 discussion[/URL][/B]
NASA -*
Earth's Energy Budget Remained Out of Balance Despite Unusually Low Solar Activity
Yes, as Shaviv said.
Good then we agree NASA is correct
NASA's data supports Shaviv's thesis.
No it doesnt
You are too uninformed to understand why you're making my case.
You are wrong again
Sorry, not good enough. You can't make an argument because you don't understand the data.
Your claim is dismissed for lack of evidence
Already presented, and you supported it because you didn't know what you were talking about.
You do not understand the evidence
Better luck next time.
Read the link. It's all there.