• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New favorite candidate: Pete Buttigieg

Cardinal

Respected On All Sides
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
106,947
Reaction score
99,103
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
For the last two years my favorite candidates have been Elizabeth Warren for her vast policy resumé, Kamala Harris for her steely focus and energy, and Beto O'Rourke for his ability to energize a crowd. All of these are incredibly important traits, but I think what they lack is a philosopher's soul. For that I give you: Pete Buttigieg.



If, like me, you like to listen to podcasts while driving or working, you can listen to the March 1st episode on itunes, or catch it in your podcast app.

Pod Save America by Crooked Media on Apple Podcasts
 
I think he's great, but the right-wing backlash compared to Obama would be several orders of magnitude worse.
 
His CNN town hall and his appearance on "Morning Joe" yesterday were amazing. He is incredible. A veteran, Rhodes scholar and speaks many languages.
 
For the last two years my favorite candidates have been Elizabeth Warren for her vast policy resumé, Kamala Harris for her steely focus and energy, and Beto O'Rourke for his ability to energize a crowd. All of these are incredibly important traits, but I think what they lack is a philosopher's soul. For that I give you: Pete Buttigieg.

He's better than some of the vying nominees, but ultimately uninspiring and leaves much to be desired; nothing about Pete particularly galvanizes or impresses.
 
For the last two years my favorite candidates have been Elizabeth Warren for her vast policy resumé, Kamala Harris for her steely focus and energy, and Beto O'Rourke for his ability to energize a crowd. All of these are incredibly important traits, but I think what they lack is a philosopher's soul. For that I give you: Pete Buttigieg.



If, like me, you like to listen to podcasts while driving or working, you can listen to the March 1st episode on itunes, or catch it in your podcast app.

Pod Save America by Crooked Media on Apple Podcasts


Seconded
 
For the last two years my favorite candidates have been Elizabeth Warren for her vast policy resumé, Kamala Harris for her steely focus and energy, and Beto O'Rourke for his ability to energize a crowd. All of these are incredibly important traits, but I think what they lack is a philosopher's soul. For that I give you: Pete Buttigieg.



If, like me, you like to listen to podcasts while driving or working, you can listen to the March 1st episode on itunes, or catch it in your podcast app.

Pod Save America by Crooked Media on Apple Podcasts


He is a great candidate but, will have a name recognition problem.
 
He's better than some of the vying nominees, but ultimately uninspiring and leaves much to be desired; nothing about Pete particularly galvanizes or impresses.

I think so many figured it will be Sanders or Biden and seeing someone young is exciting. Beto had that too but turned out to be a bit weird and having little substance. Buttigieg has strong ideas at least. Have to wonder as more time goes on if the polls are going to show Biden dropping? He has so much baggage.
 
I think so many figured it will be Sanders or Biden and seeing someone young is exciting. Beto had that too but turned out to be a bit weird and having little substance. Buttigieg has strong ideas at least. Have to wonder as more time goes on if the polls are going to show Biden dropping? He has so much baggage.

Biden will drop like a stone in time as he has historically done per his baggage; I have essentially no doubt about that.

That said, I do indeed like Buttgieg more than Beto.
 
Did a quick search and didn't come up with it... or at least a very readable version. What's his issue profile?
 
He is a great candidate but, will have a name recognition problem.

I’m not so sure; the talking heads used to mangle his last name and now the majority are getting close to correct.
 
I think he's great, but the right-wing backlash compared to Obama would be several orders of magnitude worse.

I get what you’re saying, but honestly, to hell with ‘em. We can’t worry about what the goobers think.
 
I’m not so sure; the talking heads used to mangle his last name and now the majority are getting close to correct.

It's not about confusing multi-syllabic names. It's about the everyday swing voter who thinks guns are sorta bad and taxes are kinda messed up, being able to pick him in a lineup.
 
He is a great candidate but, will have a name recognition problem.

Trump will have a field day with his name. I like him and his positions, but as of now, don't think he'll win the nomination.

Given more time and hopefully more experience having been elected to a higher office, he could be a major force in the Dem party at some point in the near future...
 
I get what you’re saying, but honestly, to hell with ‘em. We can’t worry about what the goobers think.

The Obama years proved the right will attack the Democrats even if they offer olive branches. Obama served up centrist compromises year after year and they still called him a Kenyan Socialist Muslim Brotherhood Dictator.

Some of that could be racism, but, it's mostly partisan hatred, imo.
 
Trump will have a field day with his name. I like him and his positions, but as of now, don't think he'll win the nomination.

Given more time and hopefully more experience having been elected to a higher office, he could be a major force in the Dem party at some point in the near future...

I still think Bernie is the strongest candidate vs. Trump. Anyone who tries to play Trump's game is going to lose. Trump can say indefensible horrible, non-factual things and the ignorant rubes will bend over and obey. People on the left actually care about accuracy and morality. So, if you engage Trump in the mud slinging, my theory is that it's going to energize the Trump base, because they love that ****. But, if you're basically a broken record on policy like Bernie Sanders is, Trump has no defense on that. Trump is 100% ignorant on policy and 100% unable to feel compassion or empathy towards other humans. So, he struggles connecting dots on what bad policy actually does to people. He'll basically have conspiracies, slander, and standard right wing talking points. If Sanders is just a left wing golem animated to speak Medicare-For-All, Climate Change, and Corruption, I think Sanders takes it with a walk off home run.
 
Biden will drop like a stone in time as he has historically done per his baggage; I have essentially no doubt about that.

That said, I do indeed like Buttgieg more than Beto.

Even if he announces he is running with Stacy Abrams as his running mate? I think that could help him a ton. In fact I think that would make all the other 2020 contenders feel like the deck is stacked against them. I think it would be a shame actually.
 
I get what you’re saying, but honestly, to hell with ‘em. We can’t worry about what the goobers think.

Quite honestly thats been the democrats problem for some time now. They worry too much about what the GOPers might think or how this or that appears. So they go with the safe bet...like Hillary.
 
Buttigieg is a very impressive guy. No doubt about that.

Could be a little before his time, though...not because he's gay, but because he's only mayor of a small midwest town. But you gotta love his future.

I don't have a favorite yet. Biden, Warren, Harris and Jay Inslee are all appealing. I, for one, believe John Kerry would still be a terrific POTUS.

People are quick to draw comparisons between Beto and Obama, but Obama was a policy wonk who presented massive, detailed policy papers for every aspect of his campaign. Beto is certainly inspirational, but he seems to be a little light in the britches, imo. Unlike with the GOP'ers, a campaign based upon personality, and lacking in policies and plans, etc....has a limited shelf-life in the Democratic Party. Democrats and Liberals love policy, because they respect and appreciate the role of government in our society. Beto, so far, offers a lot of great ideals, but doesn't seem to offer much substance.

I think Sanders and Castro will be, at the very least, extremely valuable to the dialogue and agenda/platfrom that ultimately is adopted by the party during the convention.

The others (Gilibrand, Klobuchar, Booker, Gabbard, Hickenlooper, etc.) don't seem to have found a singular issue upon which to gain a strong foothold in the campaign. At least, not yet.
 
...Some of that could be racism, but, it's mostly partisan hatred, imo.

I think it's not a question of could, only a question of percentages...

I still think Bernie is the strongest candidate vs. Trump. Anyone who tries to play Trump's game is going to lose. Trump can say indefensible horrible, non-factual things and the ignorant rubes will bend over and obey. People on the left actually care about accuracy and morality. So, if you engage Trump in the mud slinging, my theory is that it's going to energize the Trump base, because they love that ****. But, if you're basically a broken record on policy like Bernie Sanders is, Trump has no defense on that. Trump is 100% ignorant on policy and 100% unable to feel compassion or empathy towards other humans. So, he struggles connecting dots on what bad policy actually does to people. He'll basically have conspiracies, slander, and standard right wing talking points. If Sanders is just a left wing golem animated to speak Medicare-For-All, Climate Change, and Corruption, I think Sanders takes it with a walk off home run.

I agree with your low opinion of Don and his mud slinging. It's never a good idea to compete with someone who acts like a child and enjoys making mud pies. As much as I like Saunders and love his proposals, I think Sander's would be the weakest candidate vs Trump. I think he's doing a great disservice to the Dem party.

Regardless of what the Dems, do, say, or nominate, they couldn't possibly energize The Cult more. Don has wound the stem of The Cult's watch until it won't move. They've never had someone who expresses their fear and hatred so often and crudely and it makes their hearts soar like an eagle.

Both sides are as energized as they can get. Dem nominees don't need to inspire or motivate their base with far left proposals. They're going to vote for anyone but Don regardless of whoever's on the ballot. If both sides are spoken for, it's all a question of how the majority of moderate conservatives and independents vote.

Pander to them, tell them what they want to hear, whatever it takes. We need them, the fate of our country is literally in their hands. Thankfully after watching the clown show for two years, we have most of them sewn up. Let's try not to piss them off with radical proposals, this isn't the time. We have to get our foot in the door before we can start moving the country in a better direction.

We won't know who'll have the best shot against Don until four to six months before the Dems choose their nominee. Let's wait until then before we make our decision. And for God's sake, I hope it's a practical, not inspirational choice.

Btw, why are only Dem candidates referred to by their first names? For Dems it might be an endearment thing, for The Cult, I think it's more of a unconscious or intended lack of respect thing, like calling a black man a boy...
 
Last edited:
Trump will have a field day with his name. I like him and his positions, but as of now, don't think he'll win the nomination.

Given more time and hopefully more experience having been elected to a higher office, he could be a major force in the Dem party at some point in the near future...

Good luck finding a candidate that trump isn't going to insult based on their name, gender or any other such pre-pubescent rationale.

Here, I'll demonstrate:

"SoCal? More like Sosucks! Amiright?"

I do that with anything if I really try, and Trump can...and will...come up with those all day long because he has nothing better to do.
 
Good luck finding a candidate that trump isn't going to insult based on their name, gender or any other such pre-pubescent rationale.

Here, I'll demonstrate:

"SoCal? More like Sosucks! Amiright?"

I do that with anything if I really try, and Trump can...and will...come up with those all day long because he has nothing better to do.

Agreed, although his name in particular is like throwing an underhanded slowball across the plate...
 
Agreed, although his name in particular is like throwing an underhanded slowball across the plate...

You're not applying thirteen year old logic with enough energy. You actually believe that anybody can go into 2020 with a name impervious to Trump's immaturity.

Give me a name. Any name. I can do that with anyone.
 
Even if he announces he is running with Stacy Abrams as his running mate? I think that could help him a ton.

Old Guy/Loser 2020!

Joe better axe that decision or he'll fall flat on his face before the first primary debate.
 
For the last two years my favorite candidates have been Elizabeth Warren for her vast policy resumé, Kamala Harris for her steely focus and energy, and Beto O'Rourke for his ability to energize a crowd. All of these are incredibly important traits, but I think what they lack is a philosopher's soul. For that I give you: Pete Buttigieg.



If, like me, you like to listen to podcasts while driving or working, you can listen to the March 1st episode on itunes, or catch it in your podcast app.

Pod Save America by Crooked Media on Apple Podcasts


I heard he is gay, and I actually think that that is going to hold him back especially if he has boyfriend or husband campaigning with him. I expect really terrible comments and reactions.
 
Back
Top Bottom