I'm sorry, did you think I was defending the far right? You couldn't be further from the truth, which seems to be a recurring theme in most of your posts.I'm surprised you didn't post a meme. lol
If a beer summit is your only excuse for the far right's hate and divisiveness.....then who are the real snowflakes?
The right blames everyone and the kitchen sink for their own behavior....personal responsibility isn't even part of their lexicon anymore. It's always someone else's fault...and never has that been made more clear than with that far right wing trolling idiot residing in the WH.
Of course Neo-Nazi website is back online with Russian help
Our neo-fascists love Russia and hate America
You broke your narrative, comrade.It pays to read:
The Daily Stormer's return via the Russian internet turned out to be short-lived. The site became inaccessible later Wednesday after RU-CENTER also suspended its registration.
It's also an auto-registration, exactly like the Google one. When they saw what it was they shut it down. But by all means, carry on with your narrative.
I'm sorry, did you think I was defending the far right? You couldn't be further from the truth, which seems to be a recurring theme in most of your posts.
Obama stuck his nose in a situation that he shouldn't have and injected racism into a situation where there was none. It was his first swipe at the cops as well.
You're not even discussing the same topic anymore. Try following along and stop going off-topic.
I know what you are...no explanation necessary.
You do know that the Khmer Rouge was fully supported by the Chinese, right? Your proof doesn't hold water.
You broke your narrative, comrade.
And good looking with natural charm.You're funny!
In fact, most genocides are committed by a minority, because most of them are committed by a government.
I'm sorry, did you think I was defending the far right? You couldn't be further from the truth, which seems to be a recurring theme in most of your posts.
Obama stuck his nose in a situation that he shouldn't have and injected racism into a situation where there was none. It was his first swipe at the cops as well.
(. . .)
I did not say that NAFTA, Obamacare and the reason for the "beer summit" (Obama sticking his nose where it didn't belong) was worse than those groups/entities. If that's what you took from my comments, you clearly have an issue with reading comprehension and understanding.But wasn't it you that said that NAFTA, Obamacare and the beer summit was far worse than white supremacy, nationalism and neo-nazi's? And wasn't it you that's been calling people "snowflakes" because they don't agree with you? I think if you dig a little deeper there's a lot more substance to BLM and removing confederate statues than you care to admit. But apparently, empathy is a dirty word among the right wing and explains a lot about them as human beings...or lack thereof.
Sigh..."First swipe at the cops"....but it wasn't the first time that a black man was falsely accused and arrested by the police...and that seems to be the point that you refuse to see. I mean really....how dare Obama try to address racial tensions over a beer. How dare he try to change the status quo of white priviledge. Gosh, no wonder you're still so upset. :roll:
I was responding to another poster when you decided to jump in and embarrass yourself. Instead of reading what was really there, you decided to do what you always do, which is prove that you struggle to comprehend the written word.The topic was pretty much over the minute the Russians stopped hosting the Daily Stormer website...and I haven't seen you mention the topic or anything about that in this entire thread. All I've done is respond to your words....so what was the topic that I'm allegedly not following?
It shows no such thing. Where do you people come up with this stuff? Was there a revised liberal playbook that was published recently?Your opinion on the incident which took place in Cambridge shows us that you hold "far-right" views.
The cop did what he was trained to do and the professor ran to the media with the lies and the half-truths that we continue to see time and time again. Both the cop and the professor could have handled that quite differently and the panel that reviewed that situation came to that very conclusion.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...ssor-arrest-finds-incident-avoidable.amp.htmlRedAkston in post #212 wrote
Red you contradict yourself in just two sentences: The cop did NOT do what he was trained to do as acknowledged in the report and your words, "the cop . . . could have handled that quite differently"
Yes, I personally see far right and racist views in your posts - my opinion, derived from the words I read.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxn...ssor-arrest-finds-incident-avoidable.amp.html
The facts prove otherwise, sorry.
I'm betting that you see racism where it doesn't exist quite frequently. There isn't a racist bone in my body and I've not said a racist thing in my history here at DP and I've been here for almost 10 years now. So do you have any facts to back up your ridiculous claim or was this just an emotional reaction on your part where facts and logic didn't come into play? (Hint: I already know the answer)
That must mean that you support a double standard. Thanks for confirming that.
Ignoring the last paragraph which was nothing but incoherent rambling, what was the professor arrested for?Really? "facts prove otherwise" I have no idea where you are getting your beliefs about the situation, as even in your linked article, I can read the following: "The report suggests that Crowley could have more clearly explained what he was doing and why, especially after being shown Gates' license and university ID. For his part, Gates could have used a more respectful tone to address the officer."
I read that as telling the rational, non-racist person as a clear failure to support your original contention that Sgt Crowley " did what he was trained to do"
Once again, it all falls back upon one's personal beliefs as to whether or not one's own words are racist. Only the most blatant white supremacists openly proclaim their beliefs in the inferiority of People of Colour but many others who keep their mouths shut when the KKK speaks out or who for some reason can always defend a cop who kills or injures a black person or always fall back on "whataboutism" as a diversion when blatant racism is exposed - those persons are racists no matter how loudly and frequently they say otherwise.
Ignoring the last paragraph which was nothing but incoherent rambling, what was the professor arrested for?
Such a non-compelling argument which carries no weight whatsoever. Apparently reading the link could have saved you the embarrassment of, well embarrassing yourself. But that's OK, I get it, facts don't matter to you only feelings do. And this is why your posts are easily dismissed because they lack logic and any sign of a coherent thought process.Uh uh, you are the one who stated that the cop did what he was trained to do. Sgt Crowley DID NOT do what he was trained to do. The End.
Such a non-compelling argument which carries no weight whatsoever. Apparently reading the link could have saved you the embarrassment of, well embarrassing yourself. But that's OK, I get it, facts don't matter to you only feelings do. And this is why your posts are easily dismissed because they lack logic and any sign of a coherent thought process.