Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose***[W:977]***

[vegas giants]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

The libruls seem to be confused about enforcement matters. They seem to be attempting to blame a republican president and congress for the failure of a few local judges, mental health professionals, and police not enforcing laws on the books.

That plan does not work anywhere

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Right back atcha, big guy.

Oh, thanks!

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Deflection. That does seem to be your go to response when you paint yourself into a corner.

:lamo

My go to response? Is that so? Why don't you and Lursa show me where I've ever claimed deflection before you deflected? I'll fold my hands and wait. Go ahead.

 

[Lursa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Maybe they will, but at least they ended an injustice. And that brings us back to not caring...apparently they cared about people's right to own a firearm and due process.

So it's completely dishonest to ignore the 'maybe' just to attempt to make a point...which I now give no credibility.

And you made who you are very clear as well. (as well as dismissing other people's rights to protect themselves and forgoing their due process...that's no moral High Ground.)

I've acknowledged it several times. But I see what your goal is in this thread. Too bad.

Feel free to give me a post number...you do that quite a bit anyway.

Where did you ever acknowledge that the people having their firearms taken away may not be dangerous and may need those firearms and also deserve consideration? (And due process)

.....

 

[Lursa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

My go to response? Is that so? Why don't you and Lursa show me where I've ever claimed deflection before you deflected? I'll fold my hands and wait. Go ahead.

Shoulda let that sleeping dog lie....

 

[VanceMack]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

My go to response? Is that so? Why don't you and Lursa show me where I've ever claimed deflection before you deflected? I'll fold my hands and wait. Go ahead.

Show where you have used snarky comments to avoid answering questions or dealing with your own foolish comments??? Gosh...that would be hard. Hell...you almost couldnt find examples of that in this thread alone. Dood...thats pretty much how EVERY interaction with you has ended up.

:lamo

 

[MAGAnificent]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Ah...Those Assholes at the NRA are big contributor....Believe it

Perhaps someday you will learn that the NRA is not a judge, police department of mental health professional. It's not up to the NRA to enforce existing laws. They have no power or position to do so. They exist simply to protect the 2nd amendment. They are not in any way contributing to gun violence or gun deaths. Anyone who suggests that they do contribute to such is simply thinking emotionally rather then logically.

 

[Saladin4]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Perhaps someday you will learn that the NRA is not a judge, police department of mental health professional. It's not up to the NRA to enforce existing laws. They have no power or position to do so. They exist simply to protect the 2nd amendment. They are not in any way contributing to gun violence or gun deaths. Anyone who suggests that they do contribute to such is simply thinking emotionally rather then logically.

The NRA is leading the charge for the gun nuts..Spending millions in donations and super pac's to bully politicians into supporting their insane views on guns...They spread their paranoia and conspiracy theory's to gin up their base of angry white men...Who worship their guns above all else

 

[MAGAnificent]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

The NRA is leading the charge for the gun nuts..Spending millions in donations and super pac's to bully politicians into supporting their insane views on guns...They spread their paranoia and conspiracy theory's to gin up their base of angry white men...Who worship their guns above all else

Define gun nuts. And what insane views on guns? Be specific. If you think everyone who supports the right to bear arms is a nut, then it is you that needs to see a shrink. And the only paranoia is on the anti-gun side. You fear an inanimate object rather then the criminal who is firing the inanimate object. Your anti-gun ilk is screaming at the top of its lungs to ban guns for the sake of gun crimes committed by tiny fraction of 1% of gun owners. As for the NRA, they simply speak for millions of Americans who support the second amendment. They are not bullying anyone. They are simply lobbying congress in the name of their members, of which I am one. That's how our system of government works. If you want to get rid of NRA lobbyists, what say?, Shall we get rid of lobbyists for planned parenthood? How about we stop giving taxpayer money to Planned parenthood?

 

[TU Curmudgeon]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

So do people need guns to protect them the angry young terrorists that the alt right is breeding ( many of them like Dlyann Roof was obessed with guns)?

You guys sill want to make those "van control" jokes when the Toronto attacker was an alt right terrorist?

That loser in Toronto killed people because he couldn't get laid.

He wasn't "alt.right", "alt.left", or even "ideologically motivated" what he wanted (but couldn't get) was sex.

However, now that he has received a lot of free publicity, I have absolutely no doubt that some female, some place, will come forward and give him what he killed those people to get.

That loser had a "mission" and he succeeded - he's going to get laid.

 

[Saladin4]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Define gun nuts. And what insane views on guns? Be specific. If you think everyone who supports the right to bear arms is a nut, then it is you that needs to see a shrink. And the only paranoia is on the anti-gun side. You fear an inanimate object rather then the criminal who is firing the inanimate object. Your anti-gun ilk is screaming at the top of its lungs to ban guns for the sake of gun crimes committed by tiny fraction of 1% of gun owners. As for the NRA, they simply speak for millions of Americans who support the second amendment. They are not bullying anyone. They are simply lobbying congress in the name of their members, of which I am one. That's how our system of government works. If you want to get rid of NRA lobbyists, what say?, Shall we get rid of lobbyists for planned parenthood? How about we stop giving taxpayer money to Planned parenthood?

Gun Nut=NRA members who think any new regulation equals....Banning ALL GUNS!

 

[Maccabee]

The NRA is leading the charge for the gun nuts..Spending millions in donations and super pac's to bully politicians into supporting their insane views on guns...They spread their paranoia and conspiracy theory's to gin up their base of angry white men...Who worship their guns above all else

Evidence? Also gun control gruops spend way more than the NRA. Bloomberg alone donated 65 million to the cause.

 

[MAGAnificent]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Gun Nut=NRA members who think any new regulation equals....Banning ALL GUNS!

You fail.