Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose***[W:977]***

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

They removed his guns from his possession.

I thought for a day or two that you were a serious person, but I see I was mistaken.

So Reinking was never a "prohibited person"? You just made up that part?

So Reinking's father was never prohibited from returning the guns to him? You just assumed that part?

The legislation that I've recommended in this thread would or would not make people safer?

What a waste of time.

 

[Lursa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

And as I already noted, the Republican Congress and the Republican president could have improved the law rather than handing guns back to the mentally incapable and then lying to their voters that they care about reducing the incidence of gun violence related to mental health.

Maybe they will, but at least they ended an injustice. And that brings us back to not caring...apparently they cared about people's right to own a firearm and due process.

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Yes, and your point? You at no point in your response(s) acknowledged that.

I've acknowledged it several times. But I see what your goal is in this thread. Too bad.

 

[Lursa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

I thought for a day or two that you were a serious person, but I see I was mistaken.

So Reinking was never a "prohibited person"? You just made up that part?

So Reinking's father was never prohibited from returning the guns to him? You just assumed that part?

The legislation that I've recommended in this thread would or would not make people safer?

What a waste of time.

WHy did they take his guns away?

And I'm not sure your proposal would be worthwhile...as I gave details earlier.

 

[Lursa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

I've acknowledged it several times. But I see what your goal is in this thread. Too bad.

Feel free to give me a post number...you do that quite a bit anyway.

Where did you ever acknowledge that the people having their firearms taken away may not be dangerous and may need those firearms and also deserve consideration? (And due process)

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Maybe they will, but at least they ended an injustice. And that brings us back to not caring...apparently they cared about people's right to own a firearm and due process.

Oh, they will? When they had that oppprtunity fourteen months ago, they passed. And since then? Well, I think you know. Your claim of an "injustice" in the face of mass murders is revolting to me. What about you? What have you done to encourage Congress to make a flawed law better and discourage unfit people from murdering people? Your devotion to a firearm and what you think is due process supersedes the right of other people to live. It took me a little bit, but I understand who you are now. Thanks for making it clear.

 

[Lursa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Oh, they will? When they had that oppprtunity fourteen months ago, they passed. And since then? Well, I think you know. Your claim of an "injustice" in the face of mass murders is revolting to me. What about you? What have you done to encourage Congress to make a flawed law better and discourage unfit people from murdering people? Your devotion to a firearm and what you think is due process supersedes the right of other people to live. It took me a little bit, but I understand who you are now. Thanks for making it clear.

So it's completely dishonest to ignore the 'maybe' just to attempt to make a point...which I now give no credibility.

And you made who you are very clear as well. (as well as dismissing other people's rights to protect themselves and forgoing their due process...that's no moral High Ground.)

 

[MAGAnificent]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Thank you for clearly demonstrating that you are UNABLE to state what I supposedly said that requires evidence to verify.

And thank you for being UNABLE to aid the person in question by providing the laws they claim are present and working effectively to prevent mentally ill people from obtaining firearms.

You make a wonderful witness for my position.

Thank you for all of the thanks and not having the foggiest clue what you are talking about.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

[haymarket]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Thank you for all of the thanks and not having the foggiest clue what you are talking about.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Talking to the mirror again it would appear. And still no actual speaking to what my post asked for instead you simply do what you always do - take cheap personal shots at me who you have identified as a political enemy who must be opposed.

 

[VanceMack]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Oh, they will? When they had that oppprtunity fourteen months ago, they passed. And since then? Well, I think you know. Your claim of an "injustice" in the face of mass murders is revolting to me. What about you? What have you done to encourage Congress to make a flawed law better and discourage unfit people from murdering people? Your devotion to a firearm and what you think is due process supersedes the right of other people to live. It took me a little bit, but I understand who you are now. Thanks for making it clear.

In the name of safety and the right of other people to live, are you willing to ban teenagers from driving til they are at least 20?

 

[MAGAnificent]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Talking to the mirror again it would appear. And still no actual speaking to what my post asked for instead you simply do what you always do - take cheap personal shots at me who you have identified as a political enemy who must be opposed.

Just your corny arguments. Otherwise I could care less.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

[Medusa]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Another crazy white guy who had easy access to guns....

Guns dont kill! Only naked guys kill! :roll:

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

In the name of safety and the right of other people to live, are you willing to ban teenagers from driving til they are at least 20?

Oh, VanceMack, if you want a piece of this, you're going to have to do a little bit better than fall into a conversation with your messy pants. We're talking about enforcing existing laws related to gun ownership restrictions for mentally unwell people and about creating new laws where necessary to prevent people from knowingly providing access to guns to people who have been determined to be unfit to handle guns.

Get on topic or go away.

 

[VanceMack]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Oh, VanceMack, if you want a piece of this, you're going to have to do a little bit better than fall into a conversation with your messy pants. We're talking about enforcing existing laws related to gun ownership restrictions for mentally unwell people and about creating new laws where necessary to prevent people from knowingly providing access to guns to people who have been determined to be unfit to handle guns.

Get on topic or go away.

Its very topical. You are bleating on about saving lives on a topic where on average, 2.7 incidents occur annually, .4 involving schools, with less than 25 victims on average a year. Yet you persist in your emotional appeals for the safety of the children. At the same time, some 4,015 children between the age of 16-19 die EVERY YEAR at the hands of distracted teen drivers. S...do you actually care about children, or are you just full of ****?

 

[haymarket]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Just your corny arguments. Otherwise I could care less.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

When one wishes to pretend to show contempt or indifference, one does not say "I could care less" because if you could care less than you would care less. The proper expression is "I could NOT care less".

https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/could-care-less-versus-couldnt-care-less

and you are welcome.

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Its very topical. You are bleating on about saving lives on a topic where on average, 2.7 incidents occur annually, .4 involving schools, with less than 25 victims on average a year. Yet you persist in your emotional appeals for the safety of the children. At the same time, some 4,015 children between the age of 16-19 die EVERY YEAR at the hands of distracted teen drivers. S...do you actually care about children, or are you just full of ****?

Children, you say. When did I mention "the children"? You have tripped into this conversation with no context and a sloppy attempt to discredit points you don't even understand.

Why don't you tell me what purpose it serves to allow mentally unwell people to handle guns after they have demonstrated to a competent authority that they are unfit to handle guns? I can explain to you the purpose of allowing teenagers to drive, but I will not allow you to hijack this discussion with your rotting trash. Please address the substance of the thread before you offer your failed comparisons or go have your prepackaged conversation with someone who cares what you think.

 

[VanceMack]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Children, you say. When did I mention "the children"? You have tripped into this conversation with no context and a sloppy attempt to discredit points you don't even understand.

Why don't you tell me what purpose it serves to allow mentally unwell people to handle guns after they have demonstrated to a competent authority that they are unfit to handle guns? I can explain to you the purpose of allowing teenagers to drive, but I will not allow you to hijack this discussion with your rotting trash. Please address the substance of the thread before you offer your failed comparisons or go have your prepackaged conversation with someone who cares what you think.

:lamo

So all of your bull**** rhetoric abut saving lives and being a 'serious person'...thats just bull**** rhetoric so you can promote an ideological goal which has been proven to have impacted ONE shooter in the last 6 years.

So you got no clothes.....

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

When one wishes to pretend to show contempt or indifference, one does not say "I could care less" because if you could care less than you would care less. The proper expression is "I could NOT care less".

https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/could-care-less-versus-couldnt-care-less

and you are welcome.

One of the most common grammatical errors among thoughtless people. These are the same people who, in person, say, "a whole nother".

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

:lamo

So all of your bull**** rhetoric abut saving lives and being a 'serious person'...thats just bull**** rhetoric so you can promote an ideological goal which has been proven to have impacted ONE shooter in the last 6 years.

So you got no clothes.....

Nope. You just invented an "ideological goal" that I have never expressed. I told you I would deal with your failed car analogy after you addressed the actual subject of the thread. You made a lying reference about children; and you haven't said a word about mentally unwell people handling guns. I can tell you're having a bad day (again), but that's not my problem. You picked the wrong fight, so just retreat. I won't judge you any more harshly than you deserve.

 

[haymarket]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

One of the most common grammatical errors among thoughtless people. These are the same people who, in person, say, "a whole nother".

My favorite part comes when you try to inform them of their error and they still try and pretend that they did NOT make a mistake but knew what they were doing and its you who are at fault. Talk about casting pearls before swine!!!!

 

[MAGAnificent]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

When one wishes to pretend to show contempt or indifference, one does not say "I could care less" because if you could care less than you would care less. The proper expression is "I could NOT care less".

https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/could-care-less-versus-couldnt-care-less

and you are welcome.

Have a nice day.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

[haymarket]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Have a nice day.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Living the dream my friend ... every day is a nice day!


and right back at ya.

 

[MateoMtnClimber]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Living the dream my friend ... every day is a nice day!


and right back at ya.

I always respond to a one-sided dismissal that's just meant to be the last word. :wink:

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

And as I already noted, the Republican Congress and the Republican president could have improved the law rather than handing guns back to the mentally incapable and then lying to their voters that they care about reducing the incidence of gun violence related to mental health.

Whoa, wait. Exactly when did the Republican Congress hand guns back to mentally incapable people? You're not talking the social security fiasco are you? People can't balance their checkbooks so they can own a gun?

 

[VanceMack]

Re: Naked gunman kills four at Waffle House, still on the loose

Nope. You just invented an "ideological goal" that I have never expressed. I told you I would deal with your failed car analogy after you addressed the actual subject of the thread. You made a lying reference about children; and you haven't said a word about mentally unwell people handling guns. I can tell you're having a bad day (again), but that's not my problem. You picked the wrong fight, so just retreat. I won't judge you any more harshly than you deserve.

:lamo

The only person having a bad day is your integrity. You are bleating on about what should have been done by others about an incident that has a statistical zero impact, yet when you presented with a real world problem that is costing 4015 teenagers between the age of 16-19 their very LIVES, you run and hide behind snark and cowardice.

DONT YOU CARE??? DONT YOU CARE ABOUT DEAD CHILDREN???

Not a pretty picture you paint of yourself.