Michael Savage ... huh ?

[Nickyjo]

Absolutely true. Fox came into the market 25 years ago so they have been competitors for quite some time now. CNN was #1 and the closes Fox came was #3. Until the Trump campaign started 3 years ago.

Fox has been #1 now for 63 consecutive months and after the Mueller report dropped, CNN nosedived to #22. That is a pretty dramatic fall. Even other media host (NYT) have refused to allow their reporters to be interviewed by CNN now as they don't want to be associated with the views of the station.

Like a good lefty, I watch MSNBC. But what are “the views of the station”?

 

[Mina]

I did not post that sentence structure.With broken gaps after each sentence.

OK. It was certainly a bizarre structure.

 

[Condor060]

Like a good lefty, I watch MSNBC. But what are “the views of the station”?

Quotes from the NYT banning their reporters from CNN and Rachel Maddow shows: All of the following are direct quotes.

The move is due to what is the New York Times claims is an attempt to prevent the appearance of left-leaning bias.

It all came to a screeching halt when the Mueller report came out, and it appeared that Maddow refused to accept the results of Mueller's findings.

While the Russian probe was a real thing, Maddow approached the story with a conspiratorial mindset. Maddow claimed that Rex Tillerson was appointed by Putin and that Moscow is the "actual head" of the Trump State Dept. This is Rachel Maddow deep delusion.

The Times has blocked reporters from appearing on the MSNBC show hosted by Lawrence O’Donnell as well. Also named is the CNN program hosted by Don Lemon. Lawrence O’Donnell's show, like Maddow's, has pushed many conspiracy theories as well.

O'Donnell has attacked Trump, claiming that both his physical and mental health is in jeopardy. Despite many doctors claiming otherwise, O'Donnell pushed this theory to its breaking point.

 

[foolardi]

So what? When someone quotes you, they are entitled and allowed to correct your grammar, spelling, and punctuation. As long as they do not alter your meaning, there is nothing improper about it. Responsible journalists do that quite frequently.

So that is the Law at this Message Board.That posting or complaining about one's
grammar or spelling,punctuation is part of the rules.
Nice try Hector.
Kinda like the way things are Law when Calling into Michael Savage Talk Radio to comment.
He's totally decides how a caller will be received.He can hang-up or shout or make the caller
repeat himself and answer Savage's question ahead of the Caller's question.
Which is why Savage is not missed or Invited to CPAC or Any TV show.
Cuz he's an ingrate.Uncouth and apparently proud of it.Most of his listeners are
foul mouth loving New Yorkers or schlubs from New Jersey.

 

[Nickyjo]

Quotes from the NYT banning their reporters from CNN and Rachel Maddow shows: All of the following are direct quotes.

The move is due to what is the New York Times claims is an attempt to prevent the appearance of left-leaning bias.

It all came to a screeching halt when the Mueller report came out, and it appeared that Maddow refused to accept the results of Mueller's findings.

While the Russian probe was a real thing, Maddow approached the story with a conspiratorial mindset. Maddow claimed that Rex Tillerson was appointed by Putin and that Moscow is the "actual head" of the Trump State Dept. This is Rachel Maddow deep delusion.

The Times has blocked reporters from appearing on the MSNBC show hosted by Lawrence O’Donnell as well. Also named is the CNN program hosted by Don Lemon. Lawrence O’Donnell's show, like Maddow's, has pushed many conspiracy theories as well.

O'Donnell has attacked Trump, claiming that both his physical and mental health is in jeopardy. Despite many doctors claiming otherwise, O'Donnell pushed this theory to its breaking point.

I don’t watch Maddow, but see Times people on MSNBC a lot, almost nightly. As to Trump’s health, I refer you to the hilarious letter few years ago by a doctor on this subject. It says Donald will be the “healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.” As Rush Limbaugh would say, you can’t make this stuff up. To be fair, the doc used to be Rough Rider Teddy Roosevelt’s and Rail Splitter Abe Lincoln’s personal physician, so he would know. But word is that Trump dictated the letter. Why are we not surprised? In the mental health area, this letter plus other stuff says he pretty obviously has a narcissistic personality disorder. But who can blame him since he is the first president, the only president, etc. to have done whatever. Just ask him. Wait, don’t bother, he’ll probably tell you before you get a chance.

 

[Condor060]

I don’t watch Maddow, but see Times people on MSNBC a lot, almost nightly. As to Trump’s health, I refer you to the hilarious letter few years ago by a doctor on this subject. It says Donald will be the “healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.” As Rush Limbaugh would say, you can’t make this stuff up. To be fair, the doc used to be Rough Rider Teddy Roosevelt’s and Rail Splitter Abe Lincoln’s personal physician, so he would know. But word is that Trump dictated the letter. Why are we not surprised? In the mental health area, this letter plus other stuff says he pretty obviously has a narcissistic personality disorder. But who can blame him since he is the first president, the only president, etc. to have done whatever. Just ask him. Wait, don’t bother, he’ll probably tell you before you get a chance.

Aren't you getting a bit off topic? You asked me

Like a good lefty, I watch MSNBC. But what are “the views of the station”?

I provided you with the exact quotes of the NYT. How did we get to all this other stuff?

 

[Nickyjo]

Aren't you getting a bit off topic? You asked me



I provided you with the exact quotes of the NYT. How did we get to all this other stuff?

Yes I wandered a bit on the mention of Trump's health, pgysical and mental. Ssorry. But I also was responding to the notion that the Times didn't send people to MSNBC.

 

[foolardi]

Aren't you getting a bit off topic? You asked me



I provided you with the exact quotes of the NYT. How did we get to all this other stuff?

MSNBC is now defined by their obviousness.There is arguably Not one inkling of
Objectivity.It's full bore ... Hate on any and all things even remotely Trump related.
I think back to Mickey Rourke's really downbeat and liquor-infused character in - Barfly - { 1987 }.
Playing Charles Bukowski.There's one scene where his arch-nemesis { played nicely by Frank Stallone }
is seen charming the Ladies as bartender at a hole-in-the-wall local bar.Rourke being a regular.
Rourke admits his Hatred of Stallone { Eddie } based entirely on his " Obviousness ".
Eddie is just so patently Obvious.Living to act the Macho Man in the mold of some newer version
of Valentino.Same thing with the cast and crew of MSNBC hosts and regulars.
They are ALL so Obvious.Driven by most likely ... There's a Sucker born every minute !.