- Joined
- Jun 2, 2016
- Messages
- 34,150
- Reaction score
- 15,598
- Location
- No longer Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
It's sad that you're so frightened.
View attachment 67242599
I LOVE how so many of the DP left still think Alinsky bull**** still works!!!
Hard to believe the Mueller report will come back with nothing, considering they've already indicted (and agreed to plea deals with) multiple people associated with the Trump campaign and have referred cases to other law enforcement agencies who have also already indicted multiple people.
I know Trump supporters love to live in a fantasy world of their own creation, but to argue the Mueller report will come back with nothing, when we already know for a fact the Mueller team has already provided many somethings, is just a whole other level of delusion.
No he will be gone because if he knew there was nothing in the investigation then he should have stopped it and didn't.Rosenstein will be gone, but only because Trump is corrupt to his very core. Trump is easily the most corrupt President we've had in modern history.
Uh, no. You're making things up now. You asked for them and I provided them. Why do you continue to post things which are obviously not true?Oh we see that you're now RUNNING FROM YOUR PREVIOUS PROVEN LIE, that there have been CONVICTIONS FOR RUSSIAN COLLUSION.
I'm really starting to think you're just a bot. Let's try it out.Do I need to copy and paste it here...or are you going to suddenly start posting honestly?
This is unequivocally false. Why would you post something which is untrue?Yet none of the charges against them have anything to do with either russian meddling
This is just a lie. The lying to the FBI charges are DIRECTLY related to collusion, based on what they lied about. Why are you telling obvious falsehoods? Do you really not know what you're talking about?The lying to the FBI charges are nothing
:lol:there is 0 evidence that trump has done any of the things that he has been accused of.
THE MUELLER TEAM HAS ALREADY BROUGHT NUMEROUS CHARGES RELATED TO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE!!!No he will be gone because if he knew there was nothing in the investigation then he should have stopped it and didn't.
Amazing how you will believe completely anonymous, unverified and rebutted reports but refuse to so much as consider actual criminal indictments.He will be gone because if what he said in that recording was real he has at max committed sedition against the president and the government.
Again, Trump supporters seem to live in their own alternate reality.You can only say this if you ignore all the bull**** that obama has done.
Uh, no. You're making things up now. You asked for them and I provided them. Why do you continue to post things which are obviously not true?
I'm really starting to think you're just a bot. Let's try it out.
You didn't answer anything I said, just regurgitated propaganda very similar to what the Russian troll farms have been caught pushing.
Are you a bot? Like, will you give me the same answers if I keep asking the same questions?
:lol:There is NOT ONE FOR RUSSIAN COLLUSION...can't read or is it cannot understand what that means ?
Russians buying $45,000 of FB ads =/= "RUSSIAN COLLUSION", neither do FINANCIAL/TAX OFFENSES from YEARS AGO, which have nothing to do with the Trump Campaign.
PLEASE DIRECTLY QUOTE what "COLLUSION" indictments/convictions the Grand Buffon has racked up or give us the POST # where this allegedly happened.
:lol:
You do just repost the same things like a bot! That's hilarious.
I already provided you the indictments/convictions for collusion. The fact you keep asking for what I have already given you only reinforces my bot theory.
No, in this thread. You even quoted it and replied to it.Sure you did...in Fantasy Land.
This is unequivocally false. Why would you post something which is untrue?
Not only did Mueller's team bring two different instances of charges against Russians who actively interfered in our election on Trump's behalf, which automatically renders your statement false, Papadapolous pleaded guilty to lying to Mueller's team ABOUT his collusion. He claimed he met Mifsud before joining Trump's team when in reality he colluded with the Russian agent after joining Trump's team. Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to Mueller's team about discussing sanctions (which is most definitely colluding) with Russia in December 2016.
So your statement is absolutely false in every single way. Are you just ignorant to the facts or are you lying about them? Please let me know.
This is just a lie. The lying to the FBI charges are DIRECTLY related to collusion, based on what they lied about. Why are you telling obvious falsehoods? Do you really not know what you're talking about?
Again, Trump supporters clearly live in an alternate reality. We know for a fact Russia aided Trump against Clinton. We know for a fact Trump Jr., Manafort and Kushner sat with agents of the Russian government in order to get dirt on Clinton, dirt which somehow magically went live the day the meeting was scheduled. We know that Trump asked Russia to get Clinton emails and Russian agents started attacking Clinton servers almost immediately.
None of which involve the trump campaign.The claim there is "0 evidence" is a lie, just like the rest of your post.
THE MUELLER TEAM HAS ALREADY BROUGHT NUMEROUS CHARGES RELATED TO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE!!!
Maybe if I post in all caps you'll stop posting incredibly stupid and obvious lies.
Amazing how you will believe completely anonymous, unverified and rebutted reports but refuse to so much as consider actual criminal indictments.
This post is one of the most dishonest I've seen in a while.
Again, Trump supporters seem to live in their own alternate reality.
:lol:
You do just repost the same things like a bot! That's hilarious.
I already provided you the indictments/convictions for collusion. The fact you keep asking for what I have already given you only reinforces my bot theory.
It should never come down to one unelected guy like this to decide, surely everyone understands this much.
So many of these people that we got told are "Awesome, the best we have!" have turned out to be crap.
no you haven't because collusion is not a crime in this case.
collusion is only a crime in anti-trust laws.
you don't know what you are talking about and are just throwing out buzz words.
no it is called conspiracy.Conspiracy to defraud is a crime. Colluding to commit a crime is called a conspiracy.
no it is called conspiracy.
collusion is a crime in anti-trust laws.
that is it. these are legal terms and they have separate meanings.
LOL Did you know that larceny is not a crime. The term is not mentioned in criminal statutes. So if one commits bank larceny is he breaking the law?
again you prove you don't know what you are talking about. it took me 5 second google search to prove you wrong.
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/robbery-vs-larceny-charges.html
you really should look stuff up before making an argument.
I was wrong I should have used "heist" as the example, sorry. Heist is the example which is not mentioned in statutes. So does that mean that a bank heist is not a crime?
Why can't you just admit you were wrong.
it really is that simple.
Yes, it actually does. It proves charges against them are related to Russian meddling, particularly the indictments against the Russians who meddled.That doesn't prove my statement untrue.
So they lied about colluding with Russia and were convicted for it, but that has nothing to do with collusion with Russia, so obviously Mueller's team won't have anything. :lol:No they lied about meeting with Russian diplomats or having contact with russian people and not telling the FBI about those meetings.
they were not related to collusion which is not a crime by the way.
This coming from the person who said people convicted for lying about their collusion with Russia had nothing to do with collusion with Russia breaks every irony meter I have.Why can't you just admit you were wrong.
No it doesn't i said no one on trumps campaign has been charged with conspiracy with russia, and they haven't.Yes, it actually does. It proves charges against them are related to Russian meddling, particularly the indictments against the Russians who meddled.
If you're going to post an obvious lie right out of the gate, then clearly you're not worth my time. Except for this little gem:
So they lied about colluding with Russia and were convicted for it, but that has nothing to do with collusion with Russia, so obviously Mueller's team won't have anything. :lol:
The sheer idiocy coming from Trump supporters anymore is overwhelming.
This coming from the person who said people convicted for lying about their collusion with Russia had nothing to do with collusion with Russia breaks every irony meter I have.
I did. Now answer my question. Is a bank heist illegal?