• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Joe Biden: White America 'has to admit there's still a systemic racism'

He couldn't admit that. He was the Vice President in the most overtly racist administration in memory.

How so? Compare him with the current administration if you dare. Obama's message was unity. He backtracked when he insulted a cop. Name a similar incident in Trump's record. Trump's message has been division from the Mexican rapist comments forward, through the Judge Curiel affair, etc.
 
And we all know that for the Left, circumstantial evidence is totally OK when it serves the purposes of the Left.

And we all know for the reason, treason, slavery, and terrorism are no big deal and should be celebrated.

I get you lot aren’t bright enough to grasp information unless a bloated orange loser tells you what to think, but your ignorance is rather funny.
 
I don't doubt that the New Black Racists think that it's really witty to turn back the traditional anti-black insult onto white people, although it's been going on for so long, and in so many venues, that a movie like PANTHER does so more out of knee-jerk politics than out of any special insight.

No, of course it's not my "best evidence;" I gotta million of 'em. But from your previous posts I know you can't tell day from night, so I don't trouble to distinguish between "best" and "not as good" when I'm talking to you.

And you still have failed to show how Black Panther promotes racial supremacy in any way. The fact that it sticks in the craws of you and your whiskey tango hick buddies that one of your insults got thrown back in your faces is irrelevant.

Sounds like the only place it’s been “going on” is in your fevered fantasies.

And yet, you have yet to provide any...... which makes your post sound even more like bull**** than it already did.
 
The times of now and the days that come and go, are exposing many things of the past of the attitudes and mentalities that once influenced a society through the promotion of "white nationalist agenda". No longer are people accepting the premise of white nationalism, of "white male dominance". the learning curve is faster every day... to see who the long past of such was of much damage to women in general, minorities and the aged. It does not mean white men won't have opportunity, it means they now must get in the "equality line" with everyone else. The change is bringing the premise and principles of "equality"... Something that was long fought against by the "white nationalist ideals of white male dominance".

After World War II women were no longer willing to make her life in the kitchen and the laundry room, they came to learn they could work, they enjoyed working and they desired to be seen as a equal person, even those who did stay home and raise the kids, cook and maintain the home. They were no longer willing to accept a status of being "less than", and they were not longer willing to ruled out of accessibility as an independent individual as person. They were no longer willing to accept being judged as being unworthy is they were not married by their early 20's. They were not going to be "bought and paid for possessions", who were once appeased with an allowance for "shopping" and being thought of like a store mannequin dress up doll. They certainly would not submit themselves to continuing to think of sexual intimacy as a duty which did not include or regard her interest, concerns and ideas and motivations within that aspect of relationships.

She was not going to just be an "heir" producer as if she was simply an "heir making machine".... she wanted and today she is driven to raise kids as "individuals", and 'persons of equality".... Not based in measuring themselves by how much money they make, or if they played this sport or that sport, or if they were some clone script that followed a pattern of the past.
They are now teaching their kids... that being a "bully" is to be a brute as in being savage like. They are teaching today, what compassion is, how understanding others works and the damages of treating people as less than, and not to try and treat girls and women as if they are possessions.
They are fighting back against the brutality and beating and killings of their gender, when they refuse to be "owned as if they are some mans possession" and killed if they try and leave, as if he thinks if he can't have and control her, then he will kill her... They are today learning more and more how to spot the signs of such character and mentality types in men who seek and pursue them.

White Nationalism was not just about Race based Dominance, it was also about Gender Dominance and Social Dictations and Policies in the Civil Systems of Discrimination's as if only "white males" could ration out liberty, justice, freedoms, and make political choices based on who they want to deny and discriminate against, in aims to retain the system of white male dominance.

Today, the madness of Fascism as a form of radical authoritarian ultranationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy, in aim to try and preserve and prolong the system of white nationalism and white male dominance, IS NOT something American society of liberal minded white males, women, and minorities of every ethnic group.. "WILL NOT" tolerate and certainly will not submit unto.

People are becoming more and more involved in every form of pursuits of learning, and gaining the education and are being made aware .... No Longer are people submitting themselves to the voice of the wealthy.

Time continues its march forward in the works to vanquish the ignorance of racism... it still takes great works and continuing education... as people come to learn more of the damages the ignorance of racism has caused upon society and this nation, and what havoc it has wreaked in the global system. The white nationalist and its white dominance ideals that created imperialist agenda is no longer able to stomp around the world promoting such vile, abusing societies and chasing greed of money.

People the world over are learning what is the principles of Individual as Person and what that means in the Equality of Human Beings right to live their lives, embrace, enjoy and make their contribution as living beings in a world that is always working to make better society.
 
Yes, your hysterical defense is indeed utter drivel. I get that you are desperately clinging at whatever straws drift by to try and defend your fantasy version of history—indeed, desperately trying to spin and twist and suck and dodge in an attempt to try and draw some kind of parallel between your slaver heroes and the Union—-but unfortunately for you we have this neat things called “primary sources” which let us know what people back then thought.

Primary sources, assuming you really have some that you swear by, don't tell you what people thought. They tell you what people wrote.

I'm slightly curious now, to see if you have a specific primary source that gave you this idea that the Northerners ceded control of the South back to white Southerners out of "leniency," or if that's just your own misbegotten conclusion.
 
And we all know for the reason, treason, slavery, and terrorism are no big deal and should be celebrated.

I get you lot aren’t bright enough to grasp information unless a bloated orange loser tells you what to think, but your ignorance is rather funny.

Talk about hysteria; what a revealing way to change the subject from "lack of evidence" to supposed "treason, slavery and terrorism."

With acolytes like you, it's no wonder the Left has run out of ideas.
 
And you still have failed to show how Black Panther promotes racial supremacy in any way. The fact that it sticks in the craws of you and your whiskey tango hick buddies that one of your insults got thrown back in your faces is irrelevant.

Sounds like the only place it’s been “going on” is in your fevered fantasies.

And yet, you have yet to provide any...... which makes your post sound even more like bull**** than it already did.

The most glaring example in recent times-- which I'm sure you overlooked-- was the way one blogger with the dumbcluck name of "OscarSoWhite" managed to panic the Oscars Academy with a whiny, brainless attack on the supposed racism of the Awards, so much so that the entire event was made a monument to white liberals' fear that non-whites might call them racists (which they will anyway, no matter what awards are given out or what concessions are made).

You can kid yourself if you like that this has something to do with the noble goal of diversity, or even some contrived form of reparations. In fact, it's all about the Benjamins, about people willing to stoop to any form of race-baiting for purposes of gain.

Again, I'm sure race-baiting is OK with you, as long as it's done against Caucasians.
 
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/joe-biden...-systemic-210303933--abc-news-topstories.html




What a brave man! Too bad he didnt admit it when he was in office! He just suddenly realized it now! When his black driver was comming to pick him up. (he says)

Racism does exist. But it isn't what he is aiming to get rid of. Black woman Anita Hill cried out sexual harassment. But he never put any effort to get rid of Clarence Thomas, like the effort that he putting into just to get rid of Pres.Trump.
 
White people are the only ones who committed decades of racially-based terrorism.

The simple fact of the matter is that while racism exists in all races, “white folks” are the only ones who seem to think it’s okay to celebrate it.

Case in point? All those conservatives melting down over statues to the Confederacy being removed.
Your lack of knowledge of the real world is rather impressive.
Perhaps you should study up on some of the black power movement. Or go visit Japan or South Korea. Or read up on South Africa.
Talking about things you are clueless on is not a good way to impress people with your ideas or win debates.
 
Your lack of knowledge of the real world is rather impressive.
Perhaps you should study up on some of the black power movement. Or go visit Japan or South Korea. Or read up on South Africa.
Talking about things you are clueless on is not a good way to impress people with your ideas or win debates.

Yep. Case in point......your little temper tantrum here.

Failing miserably to provide any evidence of racially based terrorism in Japan or South Korea.... neither of which are part of the United States regardless......does not support your claims.

Oh yeah, you mean the movement which spent most of its time.....bombing the embassies of foreign powers? They definitely shot a number of police officers, but there's no actual evidence that those shootings were racially--- versus politically-- based; ideologically identical "white" groups conducted pretty much the exact same attacks.

So yeah, bud, I agree, you blithering angerly because the real world hurts your feelings is not a good look.
 
Primary sources, assuming you really have some that you swear by, don't tell you what people thought. They tell you what people wrote.

I'm slightly curious now, to see if you have a specific primary source that gave you this idea that the Northerners ceded control of the South back to white Southerners out of "leniency," or if that's just your own misbegotten conclusion.

Yep, people wrote down what they thought.

Your grasping at straws has officially passed "pathetic" and reached "laughable" levels.
 
Talk about hysteria; what a revealing way to change the subject from "lack of evidence" to supposed "treason, slavery and terrorism."

With acolytes like you, it's no wonder the Left has run out of ideas.

Oh, so now you are denying the KKK were terrorists? You are denying the Confederacy practiced--- and fought for--- slavery? You are denying the Confederates committed treason?

Yeah, the "left" has thankfully never had much luck--- or tried to have much luck--with ignorant white surpremacists. The cult of Trump, on the other hand, has wholeheartedly embraced them.
 
The most glaring example in recent times-- which I'm sure you overlooked-- was the way one blogger with the dumbcluck name of "OscarSoWhite" managed to panic the Oscars Academy with a whiny, brainless attack on the supposed racism of the Awards, so much so that the entire event was made a monument to white liberals' fear that non-whites might call them racists (which they will anyway, no matter what awards are given out or what concessions are made).

You can kid yourself if you like that this has something to do with the noble goal of diversity, or even some contrived form of reparations. In fact, it's all about the Benjamins, about people willing to stoop to any form of race-baiting for purposes of gain.

Again, I'm sure race-baiting is OK with you, as long as it's done against Caucasians.

So in other words your poor precious feelings were hurt that the "good old days" when minorities "knew their place" are long gone. Grow up and get over it buddy; despite what your hero claims, they are never coming back.

The biggest "clucks" are the idiots who like to scream about how everything is racist against white people......for example, a movie.....and then fail pathetically to provide any evidence.

Like I said before.......your grasping at straws isn't even pathetic anymore. It's simply laughable.
 
Yep, people wrote down what they thought.

Your grasping at straws has officially passed "pathetic" and reached "laughable" levels.

So anything Donald Trump writes (or has someone else write) about his intentions or his motives MUST be true, because no one is capable of writing down anything that isn't an exact representation of what that person really believes in his heart of hearts.

Yes, and you think I'm the one grasping at straws. :roll:
 
Last edited:
Oh, so now you are denying the KKK were terrorists? You are denying the Confederacy practiced--- and fought for--- slavery? You are denying the Confederates committed treason?

Yeah, the "left" has thankfully never had much luck--- or tried to have much luck--with ignorant white surpremacists. The cult of Trump, on the other hand, has wholeheartedly embraced them.

I'm denying that a movement to separate a group of States from a Union can be deemed terrorism, which is what you have stated through your careless conflation of separate phenomena.

Similarly, while it's broadly correct to call the KKK terrorists-- though even that term applies only to KKK groups in a certain range of years, given that the last terrorist activity I find was in 1981-- it doesn't make any sense to task them with "slavery," since at this point in time literal slavery cannot exist in the US.

But keep tossing your poop-bombs. Monkeys make everything funnier.
 
So in other words your poor precious feelings were hurt that the "good old days" when minorities "knew their place" are long gone. Grow up and get over it buddy; despite what your hero claims, they are never coming back.

The biggest "clucks" are the idiots who like to scream about how everything is racist against white people......for example, a movie.....and then fail pathetically to provide any evidence.

Like I said before.......your grasping at straws isn't even pathetic anymore. It's simply laughable.

Your idea of "evidence" is entirely based in whatever floats your boat, as in saying that the KKK are guilty of "slavery," simply because you associate the modern KKK with the Confederacy of the 1800s. Since you can't even get it right when you're talking about obvious matters of jurisprudence, why would anyone believe you capable of judging evidence that doesn't fully agree with your world view?

You might need a new metaphor. "Grasping at straws" is getting as worn out as-- well, straws that someone keeps grasping onto.
 
I'm denying that a movement to separate a group of States from a Union can be deemed terrorism, which is what you have stated through your careless conflation of separate phenomena.

Similarly, while it's broadly correct to call the KKK terrorists-- though even that term applies only to KKK groups in a certain range of years, given that the last terrorist activity I find was in 1981-- it doesn't make any sense to task them with "slavery," since at this point in time literal slavery cannot exist in the US.

But keep tossing your poop-bombs. Monkeys make everything funnier.

Again, the KKK was composed of, led by, and explicitly for former Confederates. That is basic historical fact buddy, no matter how much it hurts your precious feelings. And yes, Confederate actions towards anyone who didn't want to fight for slavery, as well as the South's African American populace, absolutely were terroristic in nature.

Yes, your ignorance is extremely amusing......as is your Lost Cause fantasizing.
 
Your idea of "evidence" is entirely based in whatever floats your boat, as in saying that the KKK are guilty of "slavery," simply because you associate the modern KKK with the Confederacy of the 1800s. Since you can't even get it right when you're talking about obvious matters of jurisprudence, why would anyone believe you capable of judging evidence that doesn't fully agree with your world view?

You might need a new metaphor. "Grasping at straws" is getting as worn out as-- well, straws that someone keeps grasping onto.

The KKK, yet again, was literally formed by and consisted of former Confederates. Their leader Nathan Bedford Forrest, in addition to being a Confederate officer, was a slave trader.

I see you have abandoned your rather sad attempt at fantasizing that Black Panther is racist......without providing any evidence of that being the case whatsoever.
 
So anything Donald Trump writes (or has someone else write) about his intentions or his motives MUST be true, because no one is capable of writing down anything that isn't an exact representation of what that person really believes in his heart of hearts.

Yes, and you think I'm the one grasping at straws. :roll:

Ah yes, and here we have yet another pathetically sad attempt at defending your fantasies.

Shrieking "lies all lies" ain't evidence bud.
 
Again, the KKK was composed of, led by, and explicitly for former Confederates. That is basic historical fact buddy, no matter how much it hurts your precious feelings. And yes, Confederate actions towards anyone who didn't want to fight for slavery, as well as the South's African American populace, absolutely were terroristic in nature.

Yes, your ignorance is extremely amusing......as is your Lost Cause fantasizing.

Not that it matters to your fantasies, but I don't support "the Lost Cause." I' m correcting you on points of the history that you're getting wrong all the time, conflating groups with separate agendas because it gives you some illusion of superiority.

Yes, some former slaveholders joined the KKK, but some KKK members never owned slaves; they just wanted to keep black people down. Neither that abstract goal nor the criminal means used for that purpose are in any way admirable to me. But I don't have to be a Lost Cause supporter to point out that you're garbling an important historical subject with your scattershot readings.
 
The KKK, yet again, was literally formed by and consisted of former Confederates. Their leader Nathan Bedford Forrest, in addition to being a Confederate officer, was a slave trader.

I see you have abandoned your rather sad attempt at fantasizing that Black Panther is racist......without providing any evidence of that being the case whatsoever.

I haven't abandoned the Black Panther case in the least. I gave you one example from the film and you replied, in essence, that reverse racism was OK with you. Why would I waste further arguments on your closed mind?
 
Ah yes, and here we have yet another pathetically sad attempt at defending your fantasies.

Shrieking "lies all lies" ain't evidence bud.

Good way to dodge the point. Your funniest yet, I'd say.

I'll poke the beat by asking the same question another way: does anything Donald Trump writes about his motivations bear the same instant level of honesty you find in whatever Union Congressmen you think told you the absolute truth in their writings?
 
Back
Top Bottom