• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is it Racist for White Countries to Remain White?

Is it Racist for White Countries to Remain White?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 38.3%
  • No

    Votes: 37 61.7%

  • Total voters
    60
“Race” is not an arbitrary social construction and the fuzziness of racial definitions does not negate their reality in several contexts. The most concrete of these differences, based on genetics, is where most of a persons ancestors originate. Blacks (African Negroids) are those who have most of their ancestors from sub-Saharan Africa; Whites (European Caucasoids) have most of their ancestors from Europe; and East Asians (Orientals, Mongoloids) have most of their ancestors from Pacific Rim countries. Although he dodged the term race, Cavalli-Sforza’s (2000, p. 70) showed a maximum likelihood tree made on the basis of molecular genetic markers substantially supports the traditional racial groups classification (Indeed, in 2018 all the gene testing services can provide an approximate breakdown of the regional-racial ancestry of person). Of course, in referring to population or racial group differences we are discussing averages.

Research can fine tune people's ancestries even further than just a general region. Like I said before, in some instances they can even trace which particular neighborhood of London your ancestors may may have been from. The science is that good. But that doesn't make people from that neighborhood a different race or subspecies.

Based on research models used in behavioral genetics and cognitive abilities a substantial part (say 50%) of both individual and group differences is genetic. It therefore it follows that even if all individuals in both groups were treated identically, average group differences would not disappear - those group differences closely aligned to racial group classification (ancestry origin and physical traits).

LOL. It's funny to read how confident you sound on this. The research is not at all clear on this. The fact that you are so eager to believe this just betrays your will to believe.

So yes race exists "scientifically" based on facts, in spite of the post-modernist delusions to the contrary.

So yes, there is no question "race" exists. But only because we create it.
 
no they can actually identify what race you are by your skull and other parts of the body

Some families are short AND bald. You can even identify people from that family by such characteristics. Doesn't make them a different race. Not, at least, unless you choose to socially DEFINE them that way.
 
Last edited:
Rome fell apart, it couldn't sustain its diverse empire like it could sustain its homogeneous republic. China has been probably the most warring country in human history. These aren't good examples.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

Rome was all white. And they only started falling apart when they stopped tolerating all the massively diverse religions in their empire and adapted Christianity as the official state religion. Is that what you are envisioning for us here?
 
Rome fell apart, it couldn't sustain its diverse empire like it could sustain its homogeneous republic.
Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

Rome fell apart because it couldn't establish clear lines of succession for it's supreme leader, not because it was too diverse or not homogeneous enough.
 
Rome fell apart, it couldn't sustain its diverse empire like it could sustain its homogeneous republic. China has been probably the most warring country in human history. These aren't good examples.

Sent from my HTC6545LVW using Tapatalk

Rome had a diverse empire for centuries. They could and very well did sustain a multi ethnic empire for far longer than your precious homogenous countries have even been a coherent entity.
 
I asked this question in another thread and got what I found to be a very interesting answer.



So what do you think? Is it racist for a white country to remain white?


I'd say no it's not racist, but then I have to ask, is it racist for African nations to want to remain black?
 
It's not racist for a white majority country to remain white so long as the government isn't deliberately trying to keep out other ethnicities.
 
There Is No Such Thing as Race

Science does not recognize race, only racists do.

That's utterly bogus. Using PCA, it's straightforward to separate humans based on race using only genetic markers.

indo1.png
 
Oh really?

You don't think that Chinese Americans consider themselves Americans?

Given how they colonize small towns in the San Gabriel Valley, dominate the school board, and introduce their own businesses, retaining their own language, no.

I'm not saying that Asians inherently cannot assimilate. Far from it. I went to high school with plenty of Asians who were fully assimilated. What I take issue with is large groups of them forming enclaves and not assimilating. That can be dealt with by limiting immigration. Further, with home prices at record highs relative to incomes, what in the world are we doing letting foreigners buy any property here? We should be taking care of Americans first.
 
So you think we are a failure as a society? Fine with me if you want to halt immigration, so long as we keep to our legal responsibility to accept qualifying refugees. When we slowed immigration at the earlier part of the 20th, that almost affected my people, who came in under the wire from Sicily.

But your thoughts represent the swings in US history. Open doors/resent immigrants/close doors/immigrants become solid citizens/open doors/resent immigrants. Wash, rinse, repeat.

And now is the time when we should be limiting immigration, and there's nothing wrong with that.
 
According to the following chart, which was prepared by the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Citizenship, 91.4 percent of the Middle Eastern refugees accepted by the U.S. between 2008 and 2013, received food stamps and almost 68.3 percent received cash welfare.

usa-muslim-refugees-91-4-on-food-stamps-68-3-on-cash-welfare.png


https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...rian-refugees-but_us_580bf50ae4b0b1bd89fdb3c6

Not only that, but refugees get access to assistance programs that most Americans have never even heard of.

https://www.dshs.wa.gov/esa/community-services-offices/refugee-cash-assistance

Yes, refugees get better treatment from the government than you do. And they get access to home assistance, along with other programs. Think about that next time you see an article about millennials not being able to afford a home.


They send much of their earned income out of the US, back to their countries of origin. I'm not saying I don't understand the desire to help their families, in fact I respect them for that. But for the sake of this discussion it's worthy to note that illegal immigrants working in America are more of a monetary asset to the countries they came from, than to the USA. That's the real reason Mexico is dead set against building a wall or doing anything that would cause illegal migration into the USA to cease.

We are being fleeced, and it's time that we stand up to this dirty scheme that is impoverishing many working Americans.

gr1.gif
 
If a country is deliberately trying to keep a country white by not allowing other intelligent hard working "non whites" into the country because they aren't white, yes it's racist. If a country happens to be majority white, then no it's not racist.
 
How about this? I speak up when I see someone voicing an opinion I strongly disagree with?

Is that not what we're both doing on this forum?
 
Yep, your ideology caused Germany and Japan to commit horrific atrocities far worse than anything that's ever happened in Detroit, and as a result caused them to be rightfully leveled by the Allies. Japan had a "common identity"--all it got them was death and destruction. As usual, that is all your ideology is good for.

Lol, you don't think that Britain was motivated by nationalism in WWII?
 
Whatta crock. What the hell is 'common identity'? Are you saying white people have a 'common identity'?
Want some examples of cities destroyed by white 'common identity'? The white homeland is pockmarked by examples.

Ask all the Mexicans who cheered on their World Cup victory over Germany yesterday whether they have a common identity.
 
Detroit fall apart because of lack of economic diversification. Their entire economy was based on the car industry.

detroit-bankruptcy-property-values-3.gif


Detroit fell apart far before the rise of foreign automakers and the 2008 crash.
 
Rome was all white. And they only started falling apart when they stopped tolerating all the massively diverse religions in their empire and adapted Christianity as the official state religion. Is that what you are envisioning for us here?

Weird, because that Eastern Roman Empire did quite well for itself despite also having adopted Christianity as the official state religion.
 
Rome fell apart because it couldn't establish clear lines of succession for it's supreme leader, not because it was too diverse or not homogeneous enough.

Rome survived for hundreds of years as a republic before it became a grand empire. Of course governmental instability contributed, but being a large empire spanning diverse cultures contributes to that governmental instability.
 
Ask all the Mexicans who cheered on their World Cup victory over Germany yesterday whether they have a common identity.

Mexican is not a race, nor is German.
 
That's utterly bogus. Using PCA, it's straightforward to separate humans based on race using only genetic markers.

We are a single species.

Try to make a big deal out of minor differences like pigmentation has no basis in science.

There is something real obvious going on outside science.
 
Back
Top Bottom